[arch-dev-public] [signoff] bash 3.2.048

Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Sat Dec 13 17:25:08 EST 2008


On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Allan McRae <allan at archlinux.org> wrote:
>> Eric Bélanger wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Dan McGee wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Eric Bélanger
>>>> <belanger at astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Aaron Griffin
>>>>>>> <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Package in testing for x86_64. An i686 build would be appreciated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bug fixes:
>>>>>>>>  FS#10073: /etc/skel/.bashrc addition for non-interactive shells
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Patch level bump to 048. Mostly minor changes, see here for patches:
>>>>>>>> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.2-patches/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please signoff
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think the x86_64 build is still in your staging dir.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whoops. FIxed now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> signoff both arches
>>>>
>>>> I just upgraded to this package now- did anyone else see this on
>>>> upgrading?
>>>>
>>>> checking package integrity...
>>>> (1/1) checking for file conflicts
>>>> [#####################] 100%
>>>> (1/1) upgrading bash
>>>>  [#####################] 100%
>>>> error: scriptlet failed to execute correctly
>>>>
>>>> -Dan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't think I got that error.
>>>
>>> Eric
>>
>> I definitely did not get that error.
>
> So I dug a bit deeper and tried to run the post_install() function
> manually without the /dev/null redirection:
>
> $ post_install
> install-info: No such file or directory for /usr/share/info/bash.info.gz
>
> $ ls /usr/share/info/bash.info
> /usr/share/info/bash.info
>
> Note the missing gz extension. If I list the contents of the package,
> the info file also doesn't have a gzip extension.

Is this an upgrade/merging issue? Doesn't zipman or whatever compress
info files too?


More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list