[arch-dev-public] [signoff] bison 2.4-1
Allan McRae
allan at archlinux.org
Tue Dec 16 02:17:02 EST 2008
Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 23 Nov 2008, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Andreas Radke wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Am Sun, 9 Nov 2008 22:47:56 -0500 (EST)
>>>>>> schrieb Eric Bélanger <belanger at ASTRO.UMontreal.CA>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> bison 2.4-1 is in testing for both arches. Please signoff.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Changes: minor upstream update, Added info file support.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Eric
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> please first make sure it doesn't cause this compile issue:
>>>>>> http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=58782
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have this build issue as well. I'll need to fix that before
>>>>> pushing bison to core. I did tried to build bmpx that has bison
>>>>> as makedepends before adding it to testing. It looks like it
>>>>> didn't triggered this problem. I'll guess I'll use gcc for future
>>>>> tests.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's already a known issue upstream:
>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-bison@gnu.org/msg01218.html
>>>>
>>>> There are plans to release a 2.4.1 soon to fix this problem. I'll
>>>> probably just wait for 2.4.1 then.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Update: In case you haven't noticed, the gcc in testing has been
>>> patched to build with bison 2.4. I've also fix libwebkit in svn to
>>> build with bison 2.4. Let me know if other packages fail to build
>>> with bison 2.4 as patching them is rather easy.
>>>
>>
>> I've just updated the bison in testing to 2.4.1. It's a minor
>> upstream update. The most important change is that the trailing
>> semicolon problem that was causing build issues is now fixed. The
>> patches that were added for gcc and libwebkit are no longer necessary
>> but there's no hurry in removing them as the packages will still
>> build with bison 2.4.1. Please signoff so we can finally move this to
>> core.
>>
>>
>
> Anyone?
Signoff - both arches
More information about the arch-dev-public
mailing list