[arch-dev-public] ISO 2008.03-2 release status update
Roman Kyrylych
roman.kyrylych at gmail.com
Fri Mar 14 17:34:21 EDT 2008
2008/3/14, Eric Belanger <belanger at astro.umontreal.ca>:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
>
> > 2008/3/14, K. Piche <kpiche at rogers.com>:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 18:50 +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> >> > Hey guys keep cool,
> >> > following packages i would like to see in core:
> >> >
> >> > pending signoffs and move to base:
> >> > pmciautils?
> >> > just a small udev.rules fix waiting for signoff.
> >> >
> >> > initscripts?
> >> > bump to 2008.03 with the last changes from git
> >> > aaron and roman will add the final changes and then release a new version.
> >> >
> >> > pending signoffs and move to support:
> >> > wpasupplicant?
> >> > waiting for signoff
> >> >
> >> > fuse?
> >> > Thomas is there an issue atm?
> >> > waiting for signoff
> >> >
> >> > kbd?
> >> > Roman wanted to add some changes and additions to it,
> >> > this is not critical we could live with the old version too.
> >> > Roman until the other things are fixed/done you have time to get kbd working.
> >> >
> >> > madwifi/madwifi-utils?
> >> > switched back to trunk version, waiting for new responses, signoff
> >> >
> >> > delayed package moves due to rebuilds and issues:
> >> > gcc
> >> > build-toolchain
> >> > libtool
> >> > perl
> >>
> >>
> >> I consider the latest perl 5.10.0-3 pretty much complete. Except for
> >> zim and mod_perl there are no other complaints with the other official
> >> packages. I don't know the status of the community packages.
> >
> > Could you please notify Firmicus about the need of rebuilds so he
> > could package updated versions locally and then upload them to
> > community soon after you move perl out of testing.
> > This will help to avoid breakage of community perl packages
> >
> >
>
>
> I was about to suggest the same thing. A quick search for 'perl' on the
> AUR interface gave me over 200 results. As most of them are perl modules
> that will definitely needs to be rebuilt, we can expect that over 200
> community package will need to be rebuilt. That is certainly a lot. IMO,
> it would be a good idea to keep perl in testing until community packages
> are locally ready.
Firmicus already did local rebuilds, sergej was notified today.
--
Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
More information about the arch-dev-public
mailing list