[arch-general] Change Arch's default crond

Thomas S Hatch thatch45 at gmail.com
Fri Apr 8 10:59:29 EDT 2011


On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Dieter Plaetinck <dieter at plaetinck.be>wrote:

> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 23:16:46 +0200
> Heiko Baums <lists at baums-on-web.de> wrote:
>
> > On the other hand this issue could be solved in a different way
> > without any further discussions. There's a need for installing one
> > cron daemon, but no need for a default cron daemon. It's pretty the
> > same issue as with the bootloaders. There's no default bootloader
> > anymore and currently it doesn't make sense anymore to define one
> > bootloader as the default, because they all have different features
> > and it depends on the system configuration which bootloader is the
> > best. In the development isos AIF asks the user to choose one of
> > currently two bootloaders (grub and syslinux), more (grub2 and lilo)
> > could or should be added. And this bootloader is automatically chosen
> > by AIF in the package selection. The same could be made for the cron
> > daemons. Put every cron daemon into [core] and let the user choose
> > his preferred cron daemon during installation.
>
> Can we do the same thing for cron daemons? Don't other packages contain
> crontab files, or something like that?  I.e. is it possible to just
> swap crons and keep a (stock) Arch system working?
> If so, it *could* be possible to do what you suggest, but don't forget,
> Arch primary objective is simplicity, not choice.
>
>
> If there is a cron daemon that does what we need, we should just make
> it the default, period.
>
> Dieter
>

Yes, If we start making the user pick all of these things in the installer
than we end up with a bit of a can of worms, we would end up with making
more installer level choices, like system logger, systemd and many other
cumbersome questions that I don't think belong in the installer.

My vote on this concept is simplicity. Just provide a default.


More information about the arch-general mailing list