[arch-general] A good time to switch to dash as /bin/sh?

Florian Pelz pelzflorian at googlemail.com
Sat Sep 27 08:02:41 UTC 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/27/2014 09:30 AM, Benjamin A. Shelton wrote:
> On 09/27/2014 01:28 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Sat, 2014-09-27 at 01:21 -0600, Benjamin A. Shelton wrote:
>>> I assumed NoExtract should have been enough
>> Correct! Or are we missing something?
> 
> Oddly, using only NoExtract caused pacman to remove the usr/bin/sh 
> symlink, replacing it with nothing. (Using both NoUpgrade and
> NoExtract seems to work fine.)
> 
> Perhaps it's a local oddity on my installation, but I admit I
> didn't fiddle with it for more than 5 minutes. I very likely
> overlooked something.
> 
> ...when all you have is a hammer...
> 
> Benjamin

Same here. With only NoExtract, I linked /bin/sh to dash, reinstalled
bash, and /bin/sh was gone. With both NoExtract and NoUpgrade, I did
the same and /bin/sh was still a link to dash.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=C31o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the arch-general mailing list