[arch-general] Package versioning

João Miguel jmcf125 at openmailbox.org
Thu Sep 1 22:39:59 UTC 2016


A 2016-09-01T23:57:07 +0200, Magnus Therning escreveu:
> 
> When packaging Haskell packages there's a bit of a twist to the version
> numbers that I'm looking for a solution to.
> 
> Upstream versions have two numbers, a version number (set by the
> upstream developer) and an "xrev" that's bumped when minor changes are
> made to packages on Hackage (Haskell's CPAN/PyPi/RubyGems/...).
> 
> Then the packaging has a release.
> 
> So far I've been using versions of the form
> 
>    <upstream version>_<xrev>-<pkgrel>
> 
> But that isn't good enough, `pacman` has for instance reported that's
> 
> ~~~
> warning: haskell-vector-algorithms: local (0.7_1-2) is newer than haskell-core (0.7.0.1_0-1)
> warning: haskell-monadrandom: local (0.4_2-1) is newer than haskell-core (0.4.1_0-1)
> ~~~
> 
> which isn't correct since
> 
>    0.7 < 0.7.0.1
>    0.4 < 0.4.1
> 
> It seems `pacman` treats underbar like a period, which isn't at all what
> I was hoping for.
> 
> I'm hoping for some help to find something better. Any suggestions on
> how I should do this properly?
What do you think about making that xrev part of the pkgrel? Instead of
0.7_1-2 you'd have 0.7-1.2 < 0.7.0.1-0.1. And even if haskell-core
continues using that underscore, 0.7-1.2 < 0.7.0.1_0-1.

It's not very common to have a decimal Pkgrel, and I'm not sure if it is
good practice, but I've used it, in fact for Haskell packages in
particular.

Regards,
João Miguel


More information about the arch-general mailing list