[arch-multilib] Multilib access?

[Thomas Bächler]

Am 17.02.2011 16:41, schrieb Peter Lewis:
>> Okay. More specifically, according to the AUR deps, lib32-libmikmod is
>> required for:
>>
>> lib32-sdl_sound
>> In the AUR, low votes.
>> Doesn't appear to have anything requiring it.
>>
>> lib32-sdl_mixer
>> In the AUR, 93 votes.
>> Required by two games: bin32-srb2 and tecnoballz - both have low votes.
>>
>> tecnoballz
>> In the AUR, low votes - actually source is also available for this, so I
>> don't know why it requires multilib at all... will investigate.
>>
>> It seems odd to me that the lib32-sdl_mixer and lib32-libmikmod have so
>> many votes, when they aren't required by anything particularly popular.
>> Perhaps 32- bit only games without PKGBUILDS require them to be installed
>> on the system?
>>
>> What do you think?
> 
> Any thoughts on this? Should we just forget it? (Though it seems to me that 
> 100 odd votes each should count for something).
> 
> Pete.

I have no idea, and it seems reasonable to add these packages. What do
the others think? I don't object to adding them, but I also have no
strong argument in favor.

In any case, I have added you to the group.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-multilib/attachments/20110217/849e5309/attachment.asc>