[aur-general] TU Meeting

[Loui Chang]

On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 07:03:10PM -0700, w9ya wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Loui Chang <louipc.ist at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 01:44:30PM -0700, w9ya wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Loui Chang <louipc.ist at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > My apologies. The list [1] is a survey of packages with under four
> > votes
> > > > done a couple of weeks ago.
> > > >
> > > > This is the data represented, in order:
> > > > number of votes
> > > > size in KB
> > > > package name
> > > >
> > > > Remove: [0] 2888.58 jump-project
> > > >
> > > > At the end are some totals.
> > > >
> > > > [1] http://omploader.org/veDEy
> > > >
> >
> > > ANALYSIS of your data as presented: The data you have generated merely
> > shows
> > > some low single digit reduced server space reductions gained from removal
> > of
> > > these pacakges. It does NOT show any other impact in and of itself. I
> > again
> > > ask for a declared meaning to the numbers.
> >
> > Please look at the totals Bob. These are not low single digit
> > reductions.
> 
> Yes, as a percentage they would be. And when looking at statistics, that
> would be the most important numbers; i.e. How big a percentage difference
> will this make.

I'm not going to look up exact numbers right now, but 
[community] takes up about 11G. This would reduce
space usage by about 1G, so that would make about 9% reduction in
disk space. The proposal that will currently be tabled will not
effect packages currently in [community] though.

Cheers.