[aur-general] Discussion about removing ibus-table-wubi from [community]

Thomas Dziedzic gostrc at gmail.com
Sun Dec 19 15:02:17 EST 2010


On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Thomas Dziedzic <gostrc at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Laurent Carlier <lordheavym at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Le dimanche 19 décembre 2010 19:28:58, Thomas Dziedzic a écrit :
>>> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Xyne <xyne at archlinux.ca> wrote:
>>> > On 2010-12-19 12:04 -0600 (50:7)
>>> >
>>> > Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
>>> >> I would like to move ibus-table-wubi [1][2] from community because it
>>> >> hasn't been updated since 27/12/2009 and it has been marked as
>>> >> deprecated upstream when you go to download it. I was just wanting
>>> >> feedback before I remove it.
>>> >>
>>> >> [1] - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/ibus-table-wubi/
>>> >> [2] -
>>> >> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/ibus-table-wubi/
>>> >
>>> > If it's marked as deprecated upstream then I think it should be removed.
>>>
>>> I would also like to remove
>>> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/ibus-sogoupycc/
>>> since it has been deprecated in favor of a new package
>>> ibus-cloud-pinyin-svn which is in the AUR but I have no intentions of
>>> bringing the newer package into community.
>>
>> I agree about the two removals. There is also the case of emerald(-themes?)
>> that is replaced for a long date by compiz afaik.
>>
>> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/emerald/
>> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/emerald-themes/
>>
>> ++
>>
>
> I think those 2 need a seperate discussion, and I wont remove them
> myself since I don't maintain them, so I don't know the story behind
> those 2.
>

Removed both ibus-sogoupycc and ibus-table-wubi


More information about the aur-general mailing list