[aur-general] trusted users business

[Ng Oon-Ee]

On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 00:12 +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> On 16.07.2010 00:08, Ranguvar wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:40, Isaac Dupree
> > <ml at isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> wrote:
> >> On 07/15/10 12:57, Angel Velásquez wrote:
> >>> Quoting the TU Bylaws Quote section:
> >>>
> >>> "This section deals with quorums, and the consequences for those that
> >>> repeatedly keep the group from meeting them.
> >>>
> >>> Quorums were established to make sure that all TUs are having a say in
> >>> the matters that they vote on, and to ensure that TUs remain active in
> >>> the job that they have taken on. All active TUs should be
> >>> participating in discussions and voting procedures in order to
> >>> continue meeting the quorums.
> >>> **For this reason, active TUs that keep quorum from being established
> >>> on a voting procedure for three consecutive voting procedures (they
> >>> need not be on the same motion) are automatically brought up for
> >>> removal procedure, by reason of unwarranted inactivity. **"
> >>>
> >>> ...So IMO we should start a removalprocedure...
> >> AFAICT, no vote-quorums have actually failed to be established in recent
> >> history, so the above automatic-removal (**For this reason...**) clause does
> >> not apply.  (The general activity-guidelines found above it might, though.)
> >>
> >> -Isaac
> >>
> > I apologize for not voting in the past several TU elections.
> > I've been a little distracted from Arch TU duties, but resolve to pay
> > more attention to the mailing list in the future.
> > Currently I'm on vacation in California, but I'll be back in New York
> > in about a week.
> > At that time I'll also be looking at the possibility of moving one of
> > my AUR packages into [community], as I still don't have any on the
> > repo (mostly because the majority of them are repackages, unsuitable
> > for binary distribution, etc.).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ranguvar
> > [Devin Cofer]
> >
> I would be very delighted to see bin32-wine moving into community. If
> you can package all the lib32 packages it depends on you will a) be able
> to do that b) have some packages that make good community candidates
> anyway (lib32 stuff). Also, why can't you do it while on vacation?
> Surely you have your SSH tunnel, right? :)
> 
> -- Lord Sven-Hendrik "Svenstaro" Haase

I second the bin32-wine thing =). For it to be useful though I think
lib32-all-graphic-drivers need to be available?