[aur-general] About PKGBUILD of the automatic nightly builds

[郑文辉(Techlive Zheng)]

That is all right,probably I was not explained my self well as I am a
Chinese needed more english expression practicing.
在 2011-12-20 上午1:36，"Dave Reisner" <d at falconindy.com>写道：

> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 01:02:00AM +0800, 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) wrote:
> > 2011/12/20 Dave Reisner <d at falconindy.com>:
> > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:40:57AM +0800, 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) wrote:
> > >> Recently,I was attracted by the songbird and nightingage media player
> > >> based on Mozilla Tech.And I noticed these to nightly build PKGBUILD in
> > >> AUR whose pkgver is part of a shell command string,and I want to do
> > >> something to make that pkgver recognised by the AUR interface.
> > >>
> > >> Anyone who can tell me how to write a automatic nightly build
> > >> PKGBUILD?Or,is there any standard on nightly build PKGBUILD?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks!
> > >>
> > >> bin32-songbird-nightly:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44366
> > >> songbird-nightly-bin:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32932
> > >
> > > Short answer: Please don't do this sort of magical garbage. As an AUR
> > > helper author, I send apples full of razor blades to people who do
> this.
> > >
> > > Long answer: If you insist, you can probably fool the AUR with a
> > > redefinition, in the same way that split packages are done, e.g.
> > >
> > > pkgver=2011.12.19
> > > : && pkgver=$(<<<cat sed statement)
> > >
> > > The first definition of the pkgver will still be the one that remains
> as
> > > the AUR's recognized version, though.
> > >
> > > dave
> > I under stand what you saying,I found these orphaned PKGBIULDs in AUR
> > with what your said magical garbage and made the AUR looks aweful.So I
> > adopted them and trying to correct that,but I didn't know what exaclty
> > should be done to these nightly build kind of PKGBUILD whith automatic
> > detecting pkgver tricks,that why this mail came to the list?
> >
> > I will update them with the removing of all that tricks.
>
> Got it -- I misunderstood your intentions. Your efforts are much
> appreciated!
>
> d
>