[arch-dev-public] license for sqlite3

[Travis Willard]

On Nov 29, 2007 3:51 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:

> My tongue-in-cheek response was a bit too cryptic. I meant to stress
> the "standard text" part which is non-existent. I know that we cannot
> and will not include a "license" for something like this, because
> public domain is not a license at all. Thus I figured my suggestion
> for the 'none' license was acceptable, but that got shot down
> quickly...
>

It wasn't shot down - I said that it's "assuming sqlite is released with no
license whatsoever".  I don't understand this public domain stuff, so when I
looked on their website, I saw something that seemed to be license-ish in
nature, and so I also added "I don't think this is the case"

If public-domain == no license whatsoever, then license=('none') is probably
the way to go, and the "none" license should be recognized as syntactically
correct.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20071129/e6ae9faa/attachment.htm>