[arch-dev-public] [signoff] filesystem-2008.06-1

Eric Belanger belanger at ASTRO.UMontreal.CA
Wed Jun 18 12:27:52 EDT 2008


On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Dan McGee wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Eric Belanger
> <belanger at astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 03:26:44PM +0200, Andreas Radke wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, this got lost in the dust. 2008.06-2 adds a symlink, please
>>>>> signoff. Eric, if you could rebuild for x86_64, that would be great.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Dan
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> rebuild done for x86_64. no problems so far. i signoff for x86_64.
>>>
>>> Another signoff for x86_64
>>>
>>> Greg
>>
>> The sysmlink didn't work here (x86_64). /usr/local/man/ is still a
>> directory.
>>
>> $ pacman -Q filesystem
>> filesystem 2008.06-2
>>
>> $ ls -l /usr/local/
>> total 32K
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K 2008-06-17 09:23 bin/
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K 2008-06-17 09:23 games/
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K 2008-06-17 09:23 include/
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K 2008-06-17 09:23 lib/
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K 2008-01-10 00:05 man/
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K 2008-06-17 09:23 sbin/
>> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4.0K 2008-06-17 12:15 share/
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K 2008-06-17 09:23 src/
>
> That is the behavior I described my patch would introduce,
> /usr/local/share/man is the symlink:
>
> dmcgee at dublin ~
> $ ll /usr/local/
> total 32K
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K 2008-06-17 06:35 bin
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K 2008-06-17 06:35 games
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K 2008-06-17 06:35 include
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K 2008-06-17 06:35 lib
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K 2007-12-10 00:03 man
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K 2008-06-17 06:35 sbin
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K 2008-06-17 06:35 share
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K 2008-06-17 06:35 src
>
> dmcgee at dublin ~
> $ ll /usr/local/share/
> total 0
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 2008-06-17 06:35 man -> ../man
>
>
>

Oops. I forgot about that. Everything's fine then. signoff x86_64.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.





More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list