[arch-dev-public] filesystem 2008.03 bump with small change?
Tobias Powalowski
t.powa at gmx.de
Wed Mar 5 15:54:56 EST 2008
Am Mittwoch, 5. März 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa at gmx.de> wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 5. März 2008 schrieb Dan McGee:
> > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Travis Willard
> > > > <travis at archlinux.org>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Aaron Griffin
> > > > > <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Tobias Powalowski
> > > > > > <t.powa at gmx.de>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9697
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > can i change fstab to:
> > > > > > > /dev/cdrom /media/cd auto
> > > > > > > ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/dvd
> > > > > > > /media/dvd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0
> > > > > > > /dev/fd0 /media/fl auto user,noauto 0
> > > > > > > 0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Looks good to me - just curious: what was it originally? Are
> > > > > > we adding unhide?
> > > > >
> > > > > Pulling from /etc/fstab on gerolde, I'd say it used to look
> > > > > like:
> > > > >
> > > > > /dev/cdrom /mnt/cd iso9660 ro,user,noauto,unhide
> > > > > 0 0 /dev/dvd /mnt/dvd udf
> > > > > ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/fd0 /mnt/fl
> > > > > vfat user,noauto 0 0
> > > > >
> > > > > Changed the filesystem types to 'auto', as the FS report asks.
> > > >
> > > > Wait wait.... removable media to auto means it will be mounted on
> > > > boot.... that seems downright wrong. If you need ability to mount
> > > > as a user, you probably want "users" in there
> > >
> > > auto FS TYPE, not auto mount. look at the noauto still in there in the
> > > mount options.
> > >
> > > -Dan
> >
> > so what to do now?
> > changing user to users too? and adding iocharset=utf8?
> > or should this be left to the user to decide which options to use?
>
> Ah, ignore me - Dan found my confusion - apparently I can't read that
> well. Yes, I am fine with the changes. Regarding the other iocharset
> and whatnot changes... I think we're getting way too specific here.
> The fstab should have sane defaults but not try to cover all bases. If
> our users don't know how to edit a file, then we got bigger problems.
ok i'll checkin then, with the auto fs type only :)
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tpowa at archlinux.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20080305/782a4939/attachment.pgp>
More information about the arch-dev-public
mailing list