[arch-dev-public] what about "ed" now?

[Xavier]

On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Andreas Radke <a.radke at arcor.de> wrote:
> I have made a change to the patch package that "ed" is now an optional
> dependency. I've searched through our svn and all I've found is that no
> other package depends on ed. I think "ed" is still a widely used *nix
> editor and you would expect it to be there.
>

Just out of curiosity, does anyone here actually use ed? I never used
it, not even once :)

Anyway, it's a 100kb package with no deps, and according to you, well
maintained upstream, so I don't think it's much important where it
sits.