From mikhail.vorozhtsov at gmail.com Mon Feb 1 01:59:37 2010 From: mikhail.vorozhtsov at gmail.com (Mikhail Vorozhtsov) Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:59:37 +0600 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request for lib32-kernel-headers Message-ID: <1265007577.6783.6.camel@pppoe196.net137-8.omkc.ru> lib32-kernel-headers[1] is obsoleted by lib32-linux-api-headers[2] to reflect changes in the core. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31544 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34216 From schivmeister at gmail.com Mon Feb 1 02:09:56 2010 From: schivmeister at gmail.com (Ray Rashif) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:09:56 +0800 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request for lib32-kernel-headers In-Reply-To: <1265007577.6783.6.camel@pppoe196.net137-8.omkc.ru> References: <1265007577.6783.6.camel@pppoe196.net137-8.omkc.ru> Message-ID: <291cdeab1001312309o664c87e0o4d8a57180ce72b0b@mail.gmail.com> Done. On 01/02/2010, Mikhail Vorozhtsov wrote: > lib32-kernel-headers[1] is obsoleted by lib32-linux-api-headers[2] to > reflect changes in the core. > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31544 > [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34216 > > -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD From catwell at archlinux.us Mon Feb 1 04:08:22 2010 From: catwell at archlinux.us (Pierre Chapuis) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:08:22 +0000 Subject: [aur-general] TU Resignation In-Reply-To: <20100131234134.GH32398@vaio.jimpryor.net> References: <20100131234134.GH32398@vaio.jimpryor.net> Message-ID: <20100201090822.4e8557cb@archlinux.us> Le Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:41:34 -0500, Jim Pryor a ?crit : > I'm closely following Lua, and can help out with the luadoc, luafilesystem, and > lualogging. luajit doesn't yet work on x86_64, which my machines are, > and I haven't played with it at all, so I won't say I can help with > that. > > Now I'm not a TU, and don't really have the time to take > on TU responsibilities even if you trusted me! I'm just offering to > help out, in case some TU is willing to adopt them but hesitates on account of > lack of experience with Lua. Or if these were to go to AUR, then I could > take them. > > The four Lua packages in AUR are graphics/plotting packages I don't use. > Hopefully there's someone else who does. But if not, I could be a foster > parent until someone comes along. I am also a Lua user, and as I was reading posts by the Arch Haskell team I thought maybe a project like that should be created for Lua. I would love to see a better support for it in Arch, and especially to see all of Kepler packaged (including Xavante). If other users on this list are interrested, please email me and maybe we could set up a user repository for lua modules... -- catwell From cmbrannon79 at gmail.com Mon Feb 1 05:13:55 2010 From: cmbrannon79 at gmail.com (Chris Brannon) Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:13:55 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] TU Resignation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4b66aa02.9653f10a.0a61.ffffc7fb@mx.google.com> Paulo Matias wrote: > Besides loving Arch, a few reasons made me leave it as my main > distribution. I could surely adapt Arch to my new personal needs, due > to its simplicity and flexibility, but due to lack of time and real > life pressure, it would not be possible anytime soon. So I'm resigning > as a Trusted User. Good luck, wherever life takes you. > I will list below my community and unsupported packages to ease adoption. *SNIP* I adopted your lua packages in [community]. -- Chris From andrea at archlinux.org Mon Feb 1 05:23:26 2010 From: andrea at archlinux.org (Andrea Scarpino) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:23:26 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU Resignation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 31 January 2010 19:12, Paulo Matias wrote: > Hi all, > > Besides loving Arch, a few reasons made me leave it as my main > distribution. I could surely adapt Arch to my new personal needs, due > to its simplicity and flexibility, but due to lack of time and real > life pressure, it would not be possible anytime soon. So I'm resigning > as a Trusted User. Sorry to hear that. Good luck dude! -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer From pressh at gmail.com Mon Feb 1 06:06:34 2010 From: pressh at gmail.com (Ronald van Haren) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 12:06:34 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU Resignation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9fcf70361002010306p530e6fd8v74013994fcf0a36f@mail.gmail.com> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Paulo Matias wrote: [snip] So I'm resigning as a Trusted User. Thanks for your contributions and good luck in the future. [snip] > - lua-related (luadoc, luafilesystem, luajit, lualogging) please don't! :-p I bet most of them are makedepends of my awesome package. So unless someone with more time also needs them as makedepends I suppose I take them next week or so. Ronald From pierre at archlinux.de Mon Feb 1 07:04:00 2010 From: pierre at archlinux.de (Pierre Schmitz) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 13:04:00 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Warning 2/2: removing kde-unstable; KDE 4.4 in testing Message-ID: <201002011304.01252.pierre@archlinux.de> Hi DEVs and TUs, I am about to move the first wave of KDE 4.4 RC3 packages into testing. These will be x86_64 at first; i686 packages might follow later this evening. There won't be any l10n packages. (they are not needed for testing and rebuild and we'll save disk space and bandwidth this way) The same Information about kde-unstable now apply to testing: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:KDE#Users Note that the kde- unstable repository will be removed soon. If you update you have to use the following commands as pacman is not able to resolve the dependencies otherwise: % pacman -Sy --asdeps qt % pacman -Su All developers and TUs should check their Qt or KDE related packages. Even if they still work you might want to adjust the dependencies. There are some like phonon etc. which are no longer covered by Qt. In general you want at least depend on kdebase-runtime for most apps. (use namcap but don't trust it ;-)) Greetings, Pierre PS: I have problems with akonadi and mysql 5.1.43. Downgrading to mysql 5.1.42 solves the problem. Can anybody confirm this issue? (test with "akonadictl start") -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre From allan at archlinux.org Mon Feb 1 08:32:49 2010 From: allan at archlinux.org (Allan McRae) Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:32:49 +1000 Subject: [aur-general] Orphans in [community] In-Reply-To: <4B5BB102.1090405@archlinux.us> References: <4B5BA396.6020807@yahoo.com.ar> <4B5BB102.1090405@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <4B66D801.8080307@archlinux.org> On 24/01/10 12:31, Daniel J Griffiths wrote: > For quite a while now we have been asking for people to adopt the > orphans in the [community] repo. Some of us have readopted packages that > belonged to us prior to the server move, and a few have even picked up > some of the leftovers. However, as of now there are 634 orphaned > packages in [community]. Therefore... any packages not adopted within > the next week that are not explicitly required by another package in > [community] will be dropped to AUR. > > If you intend to adopt a package, please be sure that you adopt for both > architectures, if applicable. Additionally, please ensure you have > adopted both architectures for any packages you already maintain. There > are a handful of orphaned packages that only have one architecture. > > Next Saturday (01/30/2010), I will go through the leftovers, adopt > anything that is required by another package in [community] myself, and > drop whatever is left to AUR. > So now that the big rebuild is out of the way, it might be a good time to do this. Want to generate a potential removal list and post it? Allan From lists+aur-general at jimpryor.net Mon Feb 1 09:35:05 2010 From: lists+aur-general at jimpryor.net (Jim Pryor) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:35:05 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Lua packages (Was: TU Resignation) In-Reply-To: <9fcf70361002010306p530e6fd8v74013994fcf0a36f@mail.gmail.com> References: <9fcf70361002010306p530e6fd8v74013994fcf0a36f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100201143505.GA768@vaio.jimpryor.net> On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 12:06:34PM +0100, Ronald van Haren wrote: > > - lua-related (luadoc, luafilesystem, luajit, lualogging) > > please don't! :-p I bet most of them are makedepends of my awesome > package. So unless someone with more time also needs them as > makedepends I suppose I take them next week or so. I'm glad these packages will have good homes. I think luadoc is the only (make)dependency for awesome, right? On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:08:22AM +0000, Pierre Chapuis wrote: > I am also a Lua user, and as I was reading posts by the Arch Haskell > team I thought maybe a project like that should be created for Lua. I > would love to see a better support for it in Arch, and especially to > see all of Kepler packaged (including Xavante). > > If other users on this list are interrested, please email me and maybe > we could set up a user repository for lua modules... Yeah, I was thinking of setting up an automated luarocks2arch system, like Haskell's cabal2arch. I did something like this for most of the Chicken Scheme modules (they're all in AUR, the automatic PKGBUILD-generater works but it's fragile and I haven't distributed it). I just haven't had time to make any progress on this for lua. But I'm willing to participate when I can. -- Jim Pryor profjim at jimpryor.net From pressh at gmail.com Mon Feb 1 09:58:02 2010 From: pressh at gmail.com (Ronald van Haren) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:58:02 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Lua packages (Was: TU Resignation) In-Reply-To: <20100201143505.GA768@vaio.jimpryor.net> References: <9fcf70361002010306p530e6fd8v74013994fcf0a36f@mail.gmail.com> <20100201143505.GA768@vaio.jimpryor.net> Message-ID: <9fcf70361002010658l57b6aa2bk9a34019e631128ed@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Jim Pryor wrote: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 12:06:34PM +0100, Ronald van Haren wrote: >> > - lua-related (luadoc, luafilesystem, luajit, lualogging) >> >> please don't! :-p I bet most of them are makedepends of my awesome >> package. So unless someone with more time also needs them as >> makedepends I suppose I take them next week or so. > > I'm glad these packages will have good homes. > > I think luadoc is the only (make)dependency for awesome, right? > > no, luadoc in itself depends on lualogging and luafilesystem so the only package which is not covered yet is luajit. Anybody needs that for a package (according to the package it is some lua code compiler?) ? From abhidg at gmail.com Mon Feb 1 11:15:32 2010 From: abhidg at gmail.com (Abhishek Dasgupta) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 21:45:32 +0530 Subject: [aur-general] TU Resignation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <16ba84961002010815k49cfd487sb27a16f552d4a2a4@mail.gmail.com> On 31 January 2010 23:42, Paulo Matias wrote: > Hi all, > > Besides loving Arch, a few reasons made me leave it as my main > distribution. I could surely adapt Arch to my new personal needs, due > to its simplicity and flexibility, but due to lack of time and real > life pressure, it would not be possible anytime soon. So I'm resigning > as a Trusted User. > Best of luck with the future! Abhishek From luis at wrongboolean.org Mon Feb 1 12:45:43 2010 From: luis at wrongboolean.org (=?UTF-8?B?THXDrXM=?= Moreira) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:45:43 +0000 Subject: [aur-general] Orphans in [community] In-Reply-To: <4B66D801.8080307@archlinux.org> References: <4B5BA396.6020807@yahoo.com.ar> <4B5BB102.1090405@archlinux.us> <4B66D801.8080307@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <20100201174543.0dad085d@wrongboolean.org> On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:32:49 +1000 Allan McRae wrote: > On 24/01/10 12:31, Daniel J Griffiths wrote: > > For quite a while now we have been asking for people to adopt the > > orphans in the [community] repo. Some of us have readopted packages > > that belonged to us prior to the server move, and a few have even > > picked up some of the leftovers. However, as of now there are 634 > > orphaned packages in [community]. Therefore... any packages not > > adopted within the next week that are not explicitly required by > > another package in [community] will be dropped to AUR. > > > > If you intend to adopt a package, please be sure that you adopt for > > both architectures, if applicable. Additionally, please ensure you > > have adopted both architectures for any packages you already > > maintain. There are a handful of orphaned packages that only have > > one architecture. > > > > Next Saturday (01/30/2010), I will go through the leftovers, adopt > > anything that is required by another package in [community] myself, > > and drop whatever is left to AUR. > > > > So now that the big rebuild is out of the way, it might be a good > time to do this. Want to generate a potential removal list and post > it? > > Allan Hello. Can I help with some of these? Or do I have to work my way through AUR? (I'm not a TU) Best regards, Lu?s Moreira. From vmlinuz386 at yahoo.com.ar Mon Feb 1 17:34:33 2010 From: vmlinuz386 at yahoo.com.ar (Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi) Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:34:33 -0300 Subject: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] exim maintainer wanted In-Reply-To: <4B664598.5040107@archlinux.org> References: <4B664598.5040107@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <4B6756F9.8000400@yahoo.com.ar> On 02/01/2010 12:08 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > exim has no maintainer and I have been assigned a bug for it as the > last person to rebuild it (db-4.8 rebuild). I do not use it and have > no intentions of fixing the bug. Does anybody want to be the maintainer? > > Allan > > If not dev take it, I guess, should be moved to [community] if there is some TU interested on it. Or drop it directly to AUR. Current exim version in [extra] is 3.69 (2007/12/20) and latest is 4.71 (2009/11/23). There are two open bug/feature reports with fixes attached [#1] [#1] http://bugs.archlinux.org/?project=1&string=exim -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D From xyne at archlinux.ca Mon Feb 1 17:43:30 2010 From: xyne at archlinux.ca (Xyne) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 23:43:30 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] [UPDATE] Perl packing guidelines discussion In-Reply-To: <4B637494.60308@gmail.com> References: <20100128122415.3a5ce4f2@archlinux.ca> <4B637494.60308@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100201234330.192883f7@archlinux.ca> > I'm still fairly new to Arch and various package building strategies but > the perl stuff looks interesting. I would like to build some perl > packages in the near future so hope to keep up with the pacpan > developments. I like what CPAN does but one thing I don't like about > using the CPAN module to build/install modules is there seems to be no > way to quickly uninstall or remove a package that is no longer needed. > That's where the Arch packager comes in really handy. > > I'm not much a forum man so hopefuly some of the traffic may find its > way to over here. > I've released the new version of pacpan which provides what I think are some powerfull tools for CPAN packagers on Arch. Please see the following: Pacpan info page: http://xyne.archlinux.ca/info/pacpan Perl Packaging Guidelines discussion thread http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=89752 Perl Packaging Guidelines ticket on the bug tracker http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18113 You may also want to take a look at bauerbill, which has taken over and improved on pacpan's old ability to install packages from CPAN with full dependency resolution: http://xyne.archlinux.ca/info/bauerbill From lists+aur-general at jimpryor.net Mon Feb 1 21:33:56 2010 From: lists+aur-general at jimpryor.net (Jim Pryor) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 21:33:56 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Lua packages (Was: TU Resignation) In-Reply-To: <9fcf70361002010658l57b6aa2bk9a34019e631128ed@mail.gmail.com> References: <9fcf70361002010306p530e6fd8v74013994fcf0a36f@mail.gmail.com> <20100201143505.GA768@vaio.jimpryor.net> <9fcf70361002010658l57b6aa2bk9a34019e631128ed@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100202023356.GH4389@vaio.jimpryor.net> On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:58:02PM +0100, Ronald van Haren wrote: > > I think luadoc is the only (make)dependency for awesome, right? > no, luadoc in itself depends on lualogging and luafilesystem so the > only package which is not covered yet is luajit. Anybody needs that > for a package (according to the package it is some lua code compiler?) Oh yeah, of course. LuaJIT is an alternative, just-in-time compiler for Lua. The package is going through some radical growth right now, from different directions. I don't expect to see a stable LuaJIT 2.0 release, or a release for x86_64, or a release that tracks Lua 5.2 (now in development releases) anytime very soon. It looks from http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/luajit/ like nothing in the repos depends on it. -- Jim Pryor profjim at jimpryor.net From angvp at archlinux.com.ve Mon Feb 1 21:55:38 2010 From: angvp at archlinux.com.ve (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Angel_Vel=E1squez?=) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 23:55:38 -0300 Subject: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] exim maintainer wanted In-Reply-To: <4B6756F9.8000400@yahoo.com.ar> References: <4B664598.5040107@archlinux.org> <4B6756F9.8000400@yahoo.com.ar> Message-ID: <330e48781002011855j6ca8bfc7i8c0154abb25790a4@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > On 02/01/2010 12:08 AM, Allan McRae wrote: >> >> exim has no maintainer and I have been assigned a bug for it as the last >> person to rebuild it (db-4.8 rebuild). ?I do not use it and have no >> intentions of fixing the bug. ?Does anybody want to be the maintainer? >> >> Allan >> >> > If not dev take it, I guess, should be moved to [community] if there is some > TU interested on it. Or drop it directly to AUR. > Current exim version in [extra] is 3.69 (2007/12/20) and latest is 4.71 > (2009/11/23). There are two open bug/feature reports with fixes attached > [#1] > > [#1] http://bugs.archlinux.org/?project=1&string=exim > Allan, I would like to maintain it if nobody of the devs wanna maintain it, so you can move it to [community], -- Angel Vel?squez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com From ghost1227 at archlinux.us Tue Feb 2 04:36:00 2010 From: ghost1227 at archlinux.us (Daniel Griffiths) Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:36:00 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] Orphans in [community]-any In-Reply-To: <20100201174543.0dad085d@wrongboolean.org> References: <4B5BA396.6020807@yahoo.com.ar> <4B5BB102.1090405@archlinux.us> <4B66D801.8080307@archlinux.org> <20100201174543.0dad085d@wrongboolean.org> Message-ID: <4B67F200.1010609@archlinux.us> Here's the first batch of orphans in [community]. These are all in arch=('any'). They are listed by last maintainer where possible, last updater if no maintainer is listed. If no one wants to adopt them they will be dropped to AUR. Last Maintainer: Alexander Fehr sportstracker (out of date) Depends: java-runtime Required By: none Last Maintainer: Andrea Scarpino shorewall (out of date) Depends: iproute2, iptables Required By: shorewall6 shorewall6 Depends: shorewall Required By: none Last Maintainer: Corrado Primier eclipse-gef Depends: eclipse Required By: eclipse-ve eclipse-mylyn Depends: eclipse Required By: none eclipse-ve Depends: eclipse-emf, eclipse-gef Required By: none Last Maintainer: Douglas Soares de Andrade eclipse-pydev Depends: eclipse, python Required By: none your-freedom Depends: java-runtime Required By: none Last Maintainer: Fran?ois Charette perl-cpanplus-pacman Depends: perl-yaml, perl Required By: none Last Maintainer: Ronald van Haren ccsm Depends: compiz-core, compizconfig-python, pygtk Required By: none compiz-manager Depends: compiz-core, xorg-utils Required By: none fusion-icon Depends: compiz-core, compizconfig-python, hicolor-icon-theme, libtool, pygtk, xorg-utils Required By: none Last Maintainer: Sergej Pupykin kbd-ru-keymaps Depends: kbd Required By: none From pressh at gmail.com Tue Feb 2 04:40:28 2010 From: pressh at gmail.com (Ronald van Haren) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:40:28 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Orphans in [community]-any In-Reply-To: <4B67F200.1010609@archlinux.us> References: <4B5BA396.6020807@yahoo.com.ar> <4B5BB102.1090405@archlinux.us> <4B66D801.8080307@archlinux.org> <20100201174543.0dad085d@wrongboolean.org> <4B67F200.1010609@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <9fcf70361002020140m23dc043dl962b27148426e1da@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Daniel Griffiths wrote: > Last Maintainer: ? ?Ronald van Haren > ? ?ccsm > ? ? ? ?Depends: ? ? ? ?compiz-core, compizconfig-python, pygtk > ? ? ? ?Required By: ? ?none > ? ?compiz-manager > ? ? ? ?Depends: ? ? ? ?compiz-core, xorg-utils > ? ? ? ?Required By: ? ?none > ? ?fusion-icon > ? ? ? ?Depends: ? ? ? ?compiz-core, compizconfig-python, hicolor-icon-theme, > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?libtool, pygtk, xorg-utils > ? ? ? ?Required By: ? ?none > adopted again. Ronald From ilbardo at gmail.com Tue Feb 2 04:40:11 2010 From: ilbardo at gmail.com (bardo) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:40:11 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Orphans in [community]-any In-Reply-To: <4B67F200.1010609@archlinux.us> References: <4B5BA396.6020807@yahoo.com.ar> <4B5BB102.1090405@archlinux.us> <4B66D801.8080307@archlinux.org> <20100201174543.0dad085d@wrongboolean.org> <4B67F200.1010609@archlinux.us> Message-ID: 2010/2/2 Daniel Griffiths : > Here's the first batch of orphans in [community]. These are all in > arch=('any'). They are listed by last maintainer where possible, last > updater if no maintainer is listed. If no one wants to adopt them they will > be dropped to AUR. I have taken mine, thanks. From pressh at gmail.com Tue Feb 2 08:35:36 2010 From: pressh at gmail.com (Ronald van Haren) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:35:36 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] partially inactive In-Reply-To: <9fcf70360912180331j1250b984n12ab56ea2660155@mail.gmail.com> References: <9fcf70360912180331j1250b984n12ab56ea2660155@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <9fcf70361002020535v58851b49pe32df3d47197a737@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Ronald van Haren wrote: > Hey guys, > > Coming Monday I'll get the key of my new apartment where I'll be > living together with my girlfriend. That's all fine and such but > before I can move our stuff I have to do quite a bit of work in the > new apartment. > > This all means that I'll still be around and try to keep up with > package releases (I'll make sure everything is up to date before > Monday) during that period, but I won't be able to quickly respond to > urgent matters or quickly fix bugs. I'll be checking my e-mail > regularly though so I'll be able to ask for help if needed. > Sometime I also have to arrange an internet connection there but I > hope to have this arranged before I move. > > I'm not too sure how long this will take but I hope to be living there > in ~1 month. Feel free to fix any of my packages during that period if > you see necessary. > > Ronald > so a little update on this. It took a bit longer than expected and I'm still not completely done with painting and stuff (yikes I really hate painting), but tomorrow I'll move my stuff over. If I'm not mistaken internet connection should be delivered sometime during this week. Either way I need a few afternoons and evenings unpacking stuff so I may not get around in doing much Arch related stuff the rest of this week. I will check my mail regularly though. I'll post an update when it's all done. Ronald From kosmici-atakuja at wp.pl Tue Feb 2 11:08:47 2010 From: kosmici-atakuja at wp.pl (kosmici-atakuja at wp.pl) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 17:08:47 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Please remove my package from AUR Message-ID: <201002021708.47627.kosmici-atakuja@wp.pl> I need somebody to help me and erase my package. I mistakenly shared my PKGBUILD file for ktorrent-3.3.3 because it wasn't available in the repos for some time, I thought people might want to use it. Turns out it was a mistake and besides ktorrent-3.3.3 is now available in the repos. I did all this because I thought that I can remove my package from AUR just by myself but I was wrong again :) I guess I'm new to this. Please remove the package. It's here: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34031 I promise I'll follow the rules next time and wait for the official repos! Thank you From biru.ionut at gmail.com Tue Feb 2 11:13:32 2010 From: biru.ionut at gmail.com (Ionut Biru) Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:13:32 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Please remove my package from AUR In-Reply-To: <201002021708.47627.kosmici-atakuja@wp.pl> References: <201002021708.47627.kosmici-atakuja@wp.pl> Message-ID: <4B684F2C.6070705@gmail.com> On 02/02/2010 06:08 PM, kosmici-atakuja at wp.pl wrote: > I need somebody to help me and erase my package. > > I mistakenly shared my PKGBUILD file for ktorrent-3.3.3 because it wasn't > available in the repos for some time, I thought people might want to use it. > Turns out it was a mistake and besides ktorrent-3.3.3 is now available in the > repos. > > I did all this because I thought that I can remove my package from AUR just by > myself but I was wrong again :) > I guess I'm new to this. > Please remove the package. > > It's here: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34031 > > I promise I'll follow the rules next time and wait for the official repos! > > Thank you > deleted. don't do that again! :D -- Ionut From sh at lutzhaase.com Tue Feb 2 11:34:56 2010 From: sh at lutzhaase.com (Sven-Hendrik Haase) Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:34:56 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Please remove my AUR package "box2d-groundzero-svn" Message-ID: <4B685430.9050701@lutzhaase.com> My AUR package "box2d-groundzero-svn" (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30593) was a temporary solution which is now obsolete due to upstream changes. Please remove it :). -- Sven-Hendrik From biru.ionut at gmail.com Tue Feb 2 11:37:43 2010 From: biru.ionut at gmail.com (Ionut Biru) Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:37:43 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Please remove my AUR package "box2d-groundzero-svn" In-Reply-To: <4B685430.9050701@lutzhaase.com> References: <4B685430.9050701@lutzhaase.com> Message-ID: <4B6854D7.7060605@gmail.com> On 02/02/2010 06:34 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > My AUR package "box2d-groundzero-svn" > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30593) was a temporary > solution which is now obsolete due to upstream changes. Please remove it :). > > -- Sven-Hendrik done -- Ionut From daenyth+arch at gmail.com Tue Feb 2 16:31:49 2010 From: daenyth+arch at gmail.com (Daenyth Blank) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:31:49 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Please remove my package from AUR In-Reply-To: <4B684F2C.6070705@gmail.com> References: <201002021708.47627.kosmici-atakuja@wp.pl> <4B684F2C.6070705@gmail.com> Message-ID: On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:13, Ionut Biru wrote: > On 02/02/2010 06:08 PM, kosmici-atakuja at wp.pl wrote: >> >> I need somebody to help me and erase my package. >> >> I mistakenly shared my PKGBUILD file for ktorrent-3.3.3 because it wasn't >> available in the repos for some time, I thought people might want to use >> it. >> Turns out it was a mistake and besides ktorrent-3.3.3 is now available in >> the >> repos. >> >> I did all this because I thought that I can remove my package from AUR >> just by >> myself but I was wrong again :) >> I guess I'm new to this. >> Please remove the package. >> >> It's here: >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34031 >> >> I promise I'll follow the rules next time and wait for the official repos! >> >> Thank you >> > deleted. don't do that again! :D > > -- > Ionut > Yes, please don't upload duplicate packages. If a similar situation comes up again, make sure that you use the "flag out of date" button on the arch website, and you can also send a working PKGBUILD to the maintainer to get it update faster. If it's orphan, send it to arch-general. Thanks From biru.ionut at gmail.com Tue Feb 2 16:41:21 2010 From: biru.ionut at gmail.com (Ionut Biru) Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:41:21 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] PKGBUILD for python-numpy, orphaned and out-of-date In-Reply-To: <604ca1b21001290352t28ea139fh2c296a04e4de8209@mail.gmail.com> References: <604ca1b21001290352t28ea139fh2c296a04e4de8209@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B689C01.6040606@gmail.com> On 01/29/2010 01:52 PM, Puneeth Chaganti wrote: > Hello, > > The python-numpy package [extra/python-numpy 1.3.0-2] is an orphaned > package and out-of-date too. > > I have edited the old PKGBUILD to work with the new release of numpy. > > After some search, I found the best way to deal with it is, to mail it > on this list. Doing the same. > > Thanks. > ~punchagan the new version is breaking compatibility? i'm willing to update it if everything is fine as i'm not sure if i want to patch all applications that depend of it. -- Ionut From ape at ape3000.com Wed Feb 3 01:56:18 2010 From: ape at ape3000.com (Lauri Niskanen) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:56:18 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Please orphan hamachi Message-ID: <4B691E12.9000108@ape3000.com> Hamachi package in AUR [1] has been marked out-of-date for a very long time. It needs a little fix on the PKGBUILD. The maintainer yack [2] has two thirds of his packages out-of-date and he doesn't reply to email. Please orphan the package 'hamachi'. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26119 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/account.php?Action=AccountInfo&ID=13750 -- Ape From foutrelis at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 02:22:10 2010 From: foutrelis at gmail.com (Evangelos Foutras) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:22:10 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Please orphan hamachi In-Reply-To: <4B691E12.9000108@ape3000.com> References: <4B691E12.9000108@ape3000.com> Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Lauri Niskanen wrote: > Hamachi package in AUR [1] has been marked out-of-date for a very long > time. It needs a little fix on the PKGBUILD. The maintainer yack [2] has > two thirds of his packages out-of-date and he doesn't reply to email. > > Please orphan the package 'hamachi'. > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26119 > [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/account.php?Action=AccountInfo&ID=13750 > > -- Ape Orphaned. :) From stefan-husmann at t-online.de Wed Feb 3 03:07:58 2010 From: stefan-husmann at t-online.de (stefan-husmann at t-online.de) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:07:58 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] =?iso-8859-15?q?Please_orphan_hamachi?= In-Reply-To: <4B691E12.9000108@ape3000.com> References: <4B691E12.9000108@ape3000.com> Message-ID: <1NcaHG-1GmVk00@fwd01.aul.t-online.de> -----Original Message----- > Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:56:18 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Please orphan hamachi > From: Lauri Niskanen > To: aur-general at archlinux.org > Hamachi package in AUR [1] has been marked out-of-date for a very long > time. It needs a little fix on the PKGBUILD. The maintainer yack [2] > has two thirds of his packages out-of-date and he doesn't reply to > email. > > Please orphan the package 'hamachi'. > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26119 > [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/account.php?Action=AccountInfo&ID=13750 > -- Ape > > Hello, I orphaned the other packages of Yack , too. Last changes were in May 2009, so he might be inactive since then. Regards Stefan From punchagan at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 03:07:55 2010 From: punchagan at gmail.com (Puneeth Chaganti) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:37:55 +0530 Subject: [aur-general] PKGBUILD for python-numpy, orphaned and out-of-date In-Reply-To: <4B689C01.6040606@gmail.com> References: <604ca1b21001290352t28ea139fh2c296a04e4de8209@mail.gmail.com> <4B689C01.6040606@gmail.com> Message-ID: <604ca1b21002030007p38b5000cl6deb3763e330d2d4@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Ionut Biru wrote: > the new version is breaking compatibility? i'm willing to update it if > everything is fine as i'm not sure if i want to patch all applications that > depend of it. The new version is compatible with the older version of numpy. The Release Notes [1] says: This minor includes numerous bug fixes, as well as a few new features. It is backward compatible with 1.3.0 release. [1] http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/milestone/1.4.0 Thanks, ~punchagan From emanuel.amaral.couto at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 08:30:00 2010 From: emanuel.amaral.couto at gmail.com (Emanuel Couto) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:30:00 +0000 Subject: [aur-general] brother-mfc210c-fixed-version 1.0.0-3 - outdated Message-ID: <9109fbf61002030530h573e275ft682bacb79ecf0872@mail.gmail.com> Hi, I have declared the brother-mfc210c-fixed-version 1.0.0-3 as outdated as there were two orphan packages that were essentially the same, but with a correction in the licenses. The new packages are now managed by a user that wanted to fix some bugs in the old package. He tried to contact the old package manager (tomekk228) via email with no success. I believe tomek228 does not manage his packages for some reason and his manager title should be removed. Cheers -- Emanuel Couto n? 25816 From x-demon at x-demon.org Wed Feb 3 09:32:43 2010 From: x-demon at x-demon.org (Lex Rivera) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:32:43 +0300 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? Message-ID: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> Hi all. I wanna ask is it possible to become TU without [community] maintaining, just as AUR moderator? From daenyth+arch at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 09:37:51 2010 From: daenyth+arch at gmail.com (Daenyth Blank) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:37:51 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 09:32, Lex Rivera wrote: > Hi all. I wanna ask is it possible to become TU without [community] > maintaining, just as AUR moderator? > That's not currently possible. From thomas at archlinux.org Wed Feb 3 09:41:38 2010 From: thomas at archlinux.org (=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Thomas_B=E4chler?=) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:41:38 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> Message-ID: <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> Am 03.02.2010 15:32, schrieb Lex Rivera: > Hi all. I wanna ask is it possible to become TU without [community] > maintaining, just as AUR moderator? I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position instead of calling it "Semi-TU". When I was a TU, I didn't care at all about moderating the AUR, and maybe other TUs feel the same and rather do packaging. Conversely, you don't seem to care about packaging but about AUR moderation. I am forwarding this to arch-dev-public for reference, but I guess ultimately the TUs have to decide. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From andfagiani at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 10:58:37 2010 From: andfagiani at gmail.com (Andrea Fagiani) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:58:37 +0000 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? Message-ID: <4B699D2D.8030908@gmail.com> On 02/03/2010 02:41 PM, Thomas B?chler wrote: > Am 03.02.2010 15:32, schrieb Lex Rivera: > >> Hi all. I wanna ask is it possible to become TU without [community] >> maintaining, just as AUR moderator? >> > I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position > instead of calling it "Semi-TU". > > When I was a TU, I didn't care at all about moderating the AUR, and > maybe other TUs feel the same and rather do packaging. Conversely, you > don't seem to care about packaging but about AUR moderation. > > I am forwarding this to arch-dev-public for reference, but I guess > ultimately the TUs have to decide. > > I also think there is a lot of work to be done "polishing" the AUR, and that could be a good start. From cmbrannon79 at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 10:22:48 2010 From: cmbrannon79 at gmail.com (Chris Brannon) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:22:48 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> Thomas B?chler wrote: > I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position > instead of calling it "Semi-TU". This is a fine idea, and I see no harm in it. -- Chris From angvp at archlinux.com.ve Wed Feb 3 10:31:37 2010 From: angvp at archlinux.com.ve (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Angel_Vel=E1squez?=) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:31:37 -0300 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon wrote: > Thomas B?chler wrote: >> I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position >> instead of calling it "Semi-TU". > > This is a fine idea, and I see no harm in it. Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be creating another level of permission in the AUR, and some rules about, if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?). Let's see what happens! -- Angel Vel?squez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com From flo at chaoflow.net Wed Feb 3 10:37:00 2010 From: flo at chaoflow.net (Florian Friesdorf) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:37:00 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100203153700.GA19429@eve.local.syslab.com> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:31:37PM -0300, Angel Vel?squez wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon wrote: > > Thomas B?chler wrote: > >> I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position > >> instead of calling it "Semi-TU". > > > > This is a fine idea, and I see no harm in it. > > Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be > creating another level of permission in the AUR, and some rules about, > if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that > part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start > writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if > it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?). I'd give an AUR moderator all permissions to mess around in the AUR, be it packages of TUs or not. If somebody messes up, he/she can be punished later. -- Florian Friesdorf GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367 Jabber/XMPP: flo at chaoflow.net OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700 IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From angvp at archlinux.com.ve Wed Feb 3 10:44:19 2010 From: angvp at archlinux.com.ve (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Angel_Vel=E1squez?=) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:44:19 -0300 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <20100203153700.GA19429@eve.local.syslab.com> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> <20100203153700.GA19429@eve.local.syslab.com> Message-ID: <330e48781002030744w55149717q28f0f380dfa80674@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:31:37PM -0300, Angel Vel?squez wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon wrote: >> > Thomas B?chler wrote: >> >> I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position >> >> instead of calling it "Semi-TU". >> > >> > This is a fine idea, and I see no harm in it. >> >> Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be >> creating another level of permission in the AUR, and some rules about, >> if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that >> part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start >> writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if >> it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?). > > I'd give an AUR moderator all permissions to mess around in the AUR, be > it packages of TUs or not. If somebody messes up, he/she can be punished > later. > Lol no punishment! I don't wanna hit anybody!; Well, other question how will be the process of selection of these semi-tu ? how will be called the group semi-tu ? trusted but not at all? there are many many questions until we can make this idea possible. Just that. > -- > Florian Friesdorf > ?GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD ?E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367 > Jabber/XMPP: flo at chaoflow.net > ?OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700 > IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC > -- Angel Vel?squez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com From djszapi at archlinux.us Wed Feb 3 10:53:53 2010 From: djszapi at archlinux.us (Laszlo Papp) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:53:53 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: 2010/2/3 Angel Vel?squez : > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon wrote: >> Thomas B?chler wrote: >>> I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position >>> instead of calling it "Semi-TU". >> >> This is a fine idea, and I see no harm in it. > > Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be > creating another level of permission in the AUR, It's not so long so obviously ... > and some rules about, > if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that > part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start > writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if > it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?). Uhm.. what.. really ? 2 monthes for you ? Best Regards, Laszlo Papp From angvp at archlinux.com.ve Wed Feb 3 11:02:20 2010 From: angvp at archlinux.com.ve (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Angel_Vel=E1squez?=) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:02:20 -0300 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <330e48781002030802k2bac11ddif6c6331906533202@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote: > 2010/2/3 Angel Vel?squez : >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon wrote: >>> Thomas B?chler wrote: >>>> I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position >>>> instead of calling it "Semi-TU". >>> >>> This is a fine idea, and I see no harm in it. >> >> Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be >> creating another level of permission in the AUR, > > It's not so long so obviously ... It depends how time you consider "long-time" > >> and some rules about, >> if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that >> part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start >> writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if >> it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?). > > Uhm.. what.. really ? 2 monthes for you ? 2 months as a minimun, I said, could be more, after an aprovation (maybe this idea will be dissaproved), for me don't know how many long will be? it's long time .. so, are we in position of start a proposal? (defining it at least?) > > Best Regards, > Laszlo Papp > -- Angel Vel?squez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com From flo at chaoflow.net Wed Feb 3 11:06:53 2010 From: flo at chaoflow.net (Florian Friesdorf) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:06:53 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <330e48781002030744w55149717q28f0f380dfa80674@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> <20100203153700.GA19429@eve.local.syslab.com> <330e48781002030744w55149717q28f0f380dfa80674@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100203160653.GA23542@eve.local.syslab.com> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:44:19PM -0300, Angel Vel?squez wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:31:37PM -0300, Angel Vel?squez wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon wrote: > >> > Thomas B?chler wrote: > >> Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be > >> creating another level of permission in the AUR, and some rules about, > >> if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that > >> part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start > >> writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if > >> it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?). > > > > I'd give an AUR moderator all permissions to mess around in the AUR, be > > it packages of TUs or not. If somebody messes up, he/she can be punished > > later. > > > > Lol no punishment! I don't wanna hit anybody!; ;) still - I don't see the advantages of too restrictive rules. Let's start answering the questions - her my suggestions: > Well, other question how will be the process of selection of these > semi-tu? - (self-)proposal on this list with short personal description. - 10 people in favour: et voila - one opposing: AUR-TUs vote about it - less than ten AUR-TUs: TU's vote along the AUR-TUs > how will be called the group semi-tu ? trusted but not at all? AUR-TUs - trusted user of the AUR > there are many many questions until we can make this idea possible. > Just that. Let's get going :) -- Florian Friesdorf GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367 Jabber/XMPP: flo at chaoflow.net OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700 IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ghost1227 at archlinux.us Wed Feb 3 11:27:06 2010 From: ghost1227 at archlinux.us (Daniel Griffiths) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:27:06 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] Orphans in [community] In-Reply-To: References: <4B5BA396.6020807@yahoo.com.ar> <4B5BB102.1090405@archlinux.us> <4B66D801.8080307@archlinux.org> <20100201174543.0dad085d@wrongboolean.org> <4B67F200.1010609@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <4B69A3DA.4010805@archlinux.us> Here's the second batch... if you (re)adopt any of these, please ensure you take both architectures. Last Maintainer: Andrea Scarpino ruby-libart Depends: libart-lgpl, libjpeg, libpng, ruby Required By: ruby-gnomecanvas Last Maintainer: dibblethewrecker dibblethewrecker.at.jiwe.dot.org gdal (out of date) Depends: geos, libgeotiff, libjpeg, libpng, libtiff, mysql, netcdf, postgresql, python, python-numpy, sqlite3 Required By: gdal-grass, grass, thuban, thuban-svn grass (out of date) Depends: gdal, libjpeg, libpng, libtiff, mesa, proj, python, sqlite3, swig, tk, xorg-server Required By: gdal-grass, qgis libgeotiff Depends: libjpeg, libtiff, proj Required By: gdal libscigraphica Depends: gtk2+extra, libxml2, perlxml, python-numarray Required By: scigraphica Last Maintainer: Geoffroy Carrier gimp-mathmap (out of date) Depends: giflib, gimp, gsl, gtksourceview Required By: none Last Maintainer: Roman Kyrylych libgtksourceviewmm Depends: gtkmm, gtksourceview Required By: none network-ups-tools Depends: hal, openssl Required By: none Last Maintainer: Ronald van Haren libopenraw Depends: gtk2 Required By: raw-thumbnailer Last Maintainer: Stefan Husmann yaz Depends: icu, libxslt, openssl Required By: tellico From andrea at archlinux.org Wed Feb 3 11:45:25 2010 From: andrea at archlinux.org (Andrea Scarpino) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:45:25 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Orphans in [community] In-Reply-To: <4B69A3DA.4010805@archlinux.us> References: <4B5BA396.6020807@yahoo.com.ar> <4B69A3DA.4010805@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <201002031745.26894.andrea@archlinux.org> On Wednesday 03 February 2010 17:27:06 Daniel Griffiths wrote: > Last Maintainer: Stefan Husmann > yaz > Depends: icu, libxslt, openssl > Required By: tellico adopted. I vote to move ruby-* that are needed by none to AUR; alexandria needed they but now it is in AUR. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer From x-demon at x-demon.org Wed Feb 3 12:16:34 2010 From: x-demon at x-demon.org (Lex Rivera) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 20:16:34 +0300 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <4B699D2D.8030908@gmail.com> References: <4B699D2D.8030908@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100203171631.GA8597@lex-laptop> That's the main reason why i asked for it. I have my own repo, maybe that's why i'm not interested in [community]. But AUR have huge list of orphaned, outdated, obsolette packages. Most of them can be deleted, since they have no use now. I see them nearly everyday, and... Well, i think you catch that. AUR needs moderators. AUR must be clean. Sorry for my bad english =( On 03/02/10 15:58, Andrea Fagiani wrote: > On 02/03/2010 02:41 PM, Thomas B?chler wrote: > >Am 03.02.2010 15:32, schrieb Lex Rivera: > >>Hi all. I wanna ask is it possible to become TU without [community] > >>maintaining, just as AUR moderator? > >I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position > >instead of calling it "Semi-TU". > > > >When I was a TU, I didn't care at all about moderating the AUR, and > >maybe other TUs feel the same and rather do packaging. Conversely, you > >don't seem to care about packaging but about AUR moderation. > > > >I am forwarding this to arch-dev-public for reference, but I guess > >ultimately the TUs have to decide. > > > > I also think there is a lot of work to be done "polishing" the AUR, > and that could be a good start. From stefan-husmann at t-online.de Wed Feb 3 12:34:41 2010 From: stefan-husmann at t-online.de (Stefan Husmann) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:34:41 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Orphans in [community] In-Reply-To: <201002031745.26894.andrea@archlinux.org> References: <4B5BA396.6020807@yahoo.com.ar> <4B69A3DA.4010805@archlinux.us> <201002031745.26894.andrea@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <4B69B3B1.9040507@t-online.de> Am 03.02.2010 17:45, schrieb Andrea Scarpino: > On Wednesday 03 February 2010 17:27:06 Daniel Griffiths wrote: > > I vote to move ruby-* that are needed by none to AUR; alexandria needed they > but now it is in AUR. > 1+ from me. I could have done so whe I dropped alexandria, but I was not sure if other TUs wanted to maintain them. Regards Stefan From x-demon at x-demon.org Wed Feb 3 12:48:34 2010 From: x-demon at x-demon.org (Lex Rivera) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 20:48:34 +0300 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100203174834.GB12350@lex-laptop> The main reason why a asked for it is amount of crap in AUR. I have my own repo, maybe that's why i'm not interested in [community]. But AUR have huge list of orphaned, outdated, obsolette packages. Most of them can be deleted, since they have no use now. I see them nearly everyday, and... Well, i think you catch that. AUR needs moderators. AUR must be clean. Sorry for my bad english =( On 03/02/10 12:31, Angel Vel?squez wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon wrote: > > Thomas B?chler wrote: > >> I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position > >> instead of calling it "Semi-TU". > > > > This is a fine idea, and I see no harm in it. > > Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be > creating another level of permission in the AUR, and some rules about, > if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that > part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start > writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if > it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?). > > Let's see what happens! > > > > -- > Angel Vel?squez > angvp @ irc.freenode.net > Arch Linux Trusted User > Linux Counter: #359909 > http://www.angvp.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From ape at ape3000.com Wed Feb 3 12:55:36 2010 From: ape at ape3000.com (Lauri Niskanen) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:55:36 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <20100203174834.GB12350@lex-laptop> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> <20100203174834.GB12350@lex-laptop> Message-ID: <4B69B898.2060205@ape3000.com> On 02/03/2010 07:48 PM, Lex Rivera wrote: > The main reason why a asked for it is amount of crap in AUR. I have my own repo, maybe > that's why i'm not interested in [community]. But AUR have huge list of > orphaned, outdated, obsolette packages. Most of them can be deleted, > since they have no use now. I see them nearly everyday, and... Well, i > think you catch that. AUR needs moderators. AUR must be clean. > Sorry for my bad english =( > > On 03/02/10 12:31, Angel Vel?squez wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon wrote: >>> Thomas B?chler wrote: >>>> I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position >>>> instead of calling it "Semi-TU". >>> >>> This is a fine idea, and I see no harm in it. >> >> Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be >> creating another level of permission in the AUR, and some rules about, >> if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that >> part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start >> writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if >> it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?). >> >> Let's see what happens! >> >> >> >> -- >> Angel Vel?squez >> angvp @ irc.freenode.net >> Arch Linux Trusted User >> Linux Counter: #359909 >> http://www.angvp.com Let's start the cleaning here: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0&do_Orphans=Orphans&detail=0&C=0&SeB=nd&SB=v&SO=a&PP=25&outdated=on Maybe we should just delete all packages with no votes and that have been orphaned. -- Ape From daenyth+arch at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 12:58:40 2010 From: daenyth+arch at gmail.com (Daenyth Blank) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:58:40 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <4B69B898.2060205@ape3000.com> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> <20100203174834.GB12350@lex-laptop> <4B69B898.2060205@ape3000.com> Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:55, Lauri Niskanen wrote: > Maybe we should just delete all packages with no votes and that have > been orphaned. > > -- Ape > That seems like a terrible idea. We should only delete packages that no longer exist upstream or have been merged into another package. From flo at chaoflow.net Wed Feb 3 12:57:37 2010 From: flo at chaoflow.net (Florian Friesdorf) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:57:37 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <4B69B898.2060205@ape3000.com> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> <20100203174834.GB12350@lex-laptop> <4B69B898.2060205@ape3000.com> Message-ID: <20100203175737.GA25630@eve.local.syslab.com> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:55:36PM +0200, Lauri Niskanen wrote: > Let's start the cleaning here: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0&do_Orphans=Orphans&detail=0&C=0&SeB=nd&SB=v&SO=a&PP=25&outdated=on > > Maybe we should just delete all packages with no votes and that have > been orphaned. +1 -- Florian Friesdorf GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367 Jabber/XMPP: flo at chaoflow.net OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700 IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From flo at chaoflow.net Wed Feb 3 12:58:28 2010 From: flo at chaoflow.net (Florian Friesdorf) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:58:28 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> <20100203174834.GB12350@lex-laptop> <4B69B898.2060205@ape3000.com> Message-ID: <20100203175828.GB25630@eve.local.syslab.com> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:58:40PM -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:55, Lauri Niskanen wrote: > > Maybe we should just delete all packages with no votes and that have > > been orphaned. > > > > -- Ape > > > > That seems like a terrible idea. We should only delete packages that > no longer exist upstream or have been merged into another package. +2 ;) -- Florian Friesdorf GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367 Jabber/XMPP: flo at chaoflow.net OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700 IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From catwell at archlinux.us Wed Feb 3 13:04:52 2010 From: catwell at archlinux.us (Pierre Chapuis) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:04:52 +0000 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <20100203180452.418b8f01@archlinux.us> Le Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:41:38 +0100, Thomas B?chler a ?crit : > I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position > instead of calling it "Semi-TU". > > When I was a TU, I didn't care at all about moderating the AUR, and > maybe other TUs feel the same and rather do packaging. Conversely, you > don't seem to care about packaging but about AUR moderation. > > I am forwarding this to arch-dev-public for reference, but I guess > ultimately the TUs have to decide. I even think it could be a good idea to have "real" Trusted Users in the sense that they can be trusted as to which packages they publish on the AUR, not necessarily in binary form. They would be approved by some process, and then added to a list which could be used by software like yaourt / pakthan / bauerbill to let the users install their packages without checking the PKGBUILDs. The fact that a package on the AUR is maintained by one of these users (they would include current TUs and devs) would be accessible in the metadata (through the json RPC for example). I know there used to be a flag like that on the AUR and that it didn't work, but I think it's mainly because it was on a "by package" basis instead of a "by user" basis, which makes it a lot more work for those who have to check. As for what should be checked when users apply for this position, I would say at least: - a sufficient expertise in packaging, proved by the existence of several good packages maintained by them on the AUR, and - a means to contact them efficiently (valid email address). Anyway this is just my two cents as an Arch user, but I consider the lack of any way to trust AUR PKGBUILDs without reading them to be the thing that annoys me most with Arch as of now. -- catwell From djszapi at archlinux.us Wed Feb 3 13:12:21 2010 From: djszapi at archlinux.us (Laszlo Papp) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:12:21 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Lex Rivera wrote: > Hi all. I wanna ask is it possible to become TU without [community] > maintaining, just as AUR moderator? What's the problem with the current TU jobs/members ? I think they do their work pretty well, they react for the requests quickly enough on this mailing list! What tasks are there that can't be done by current TUs ? The first sentence from here: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines "The Trusted User (TU) is a member of the community charged with keeping the AUR in working order." I think this is the task of every TUs, so ... Otherwise you can send codes, patches, feature implementations to Louipc, I didn't have any problem with it earlier, he applied them quickly ... Best Regards, Laszlo Papp From flo at chaoflow.net Wed Feb 3 13:10:41 2010 From: flo at chaoflow.net (Florian Friesdorf) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:10:41 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <20100203180452.418b8f01@archlinux.us> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <20100203180452.418b8f01@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <20100203181041.GA25949@eve.local.syslab.com> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 06:04:52PM +0000, Pierre Chapuis wrote: > Le Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:41:38 +0100, > Thomas B?chler a ?crit : > > > I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position > > instead of calling it "Semi-TU". > > > > When I was a TU, I didn't care at all about moderating the AUR, and > > maybe other TUs feel the same and rather do packaging. Conversely, you > > don't seem to care about packaging but about AUR moderation. > > > > I am forwarding this to arch-dev-public for reference, but I guess > > ultimately the TUs have to decide. > > I even think it could be a good idea to have "real" Trusted Users in the > sense that they can be trusted as to which packages they publish on the > AUR, not necessarily in binary form. They would be approved by some > process, and then added to a list which could be used by software like > yaourt / pakthan / bauerbill to let the users install their packages > without checking the PKGBUILDs. The fact that a package on the AUR is > maintained by one of these users (they would include current TUs and > devs) would be accessible in the metadata (through the json RPC for > example). > > I know there used to be a flag like that on the AUR and that it didn't > work, but I think it's mainly because it was on a "by package" basis > instead of a "by user" basis, which makes it a lot more work for those > who have to check. > > As for what should be checked when users apply for this position, I > would say at least: > > - a sufficient expertise in packaging, proved by the existence of > several good packages maintained by them on the AUR, and > - a means to contact them efficiently (valid email address). > > Anyway this is just my two cents as an Arch user, but I consider the > lack of any way to trust AUR PKGBUILDs without reading them to be the > thing that annoys me most with Arch as of now. What about a peer trust network? Publishing packages on the AUR would involve giving an pgp public key. People sign their PKGBUILDs using their private key. People can define trust relationships towards other people ("I trust this person to write good PKGBUILDs" and "I trust this person's trust in other's"). Being a TU would mean to be signed by the TU-Authority (or whatever) and trusting the TU authority's trust would mean you can install packages that are created by TU's. -- Florian Friesdorf GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367 Jabber/XMPP: flo at chaoflow.net OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700 IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From x-demon at x-demon.org Wed Feb 3 13:15:53 2010 From: x-demon at x-demon.org (Lex Rivera) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:15:53 +0300 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <4B69B898.2060205@ape3000.com> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> <20100203174834.GB12350@lex-laptop> <4B69B898.2060205@ape3000.com> Message-ID: <20100203181553.GA14061@lex-laptop> I think it's wrong way. Some of packages just install old versions, they can be adopted by users and updated easily. Take a look at helium, for example. Fully working pkgbuild, only pkgver needs to be changed to get it up-to-date. Firstly we must take care about really obsolette packages. For example - sim-im. SVN snapshop, even when we have normal SVN pkgbuild and normal stable pkgbuild. So sim-im must be removed. And so on. When we finish cleaning up obsoletes, we can start cleaning up orphans. Here is my vision how this must work: 1. There is addittional button on pkgbuild's page - Report obsolete. 2. If user clicks this button, notify will be sent, for example, to aur-mods maillist 3. Mod will remove this packages 4. Package must be moved to some sort of archive - there will always be human mistakes. That archive can be cleaned, for example, every month. Or not cleaned at all - pkgbuilds are pretty small :) 5. When user try to create new PKGBUILD with pkgname = name of previously removed pkgbuild, maybe we must print some notice and link to old pkgbuild. Old projects can be revived sometimes. On 03/02/10 19:55, Lauri Niskanen wrote: > On 02/03/2010 07:48 PM, Lex Rivera wrote: > > The main reason why a asked for it is amount of crap in AUR. I have my own repo, maybe > > that's why i'm not interested in [community]. But AUR have huge list of > > orphaned, outdated, obsolette packages. Most of them can be deleted, > > since they have no use now. I see them nearly everyday, and... Well, i > > think you catch that. AUR needs moderators. AUR must be clean. > > Sorry for my bad english =( > > > > On 03/02/10 12:31, Angel Vel?squez wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon wrote: > >>> Thomas B?chler wrote: > >>>> I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position > >>>> instead of calling it "Semi-TU". > >>> > >>> This is a fine idea, and I see no harm in it. > >> > >> Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be > >> creating another level of permission in the AUR, and some rules about, > >> if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that > >> part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start > >> writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if > >> it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?). > >> > >> Let's see what happens! > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Angel Vel?squez > >> angvp @ irc.freenode.net > >> Arch Linux Trusted User > >> Linux Counter: #359909 > >> http://www.angvp.com > > Let's start the cleaning here: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0&do_Orphans=Orphans&detail=0&C=0&SeB=nd&SB=v&SO=a&PP=25&outdated=on > > Maybe we should just delete all packages with no votes and that have > been orphaned. > > -- Ape -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From x-demon at x-demon.org Wed Feb 3 13:18:50 2010 From: x-demon at x-demon.org (Lex Rivera) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:18:50 +0300 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <20100203175828.GB25630@eve.local.syslab.com> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> <20100203174834.GB12350@lex-laptop> <4B69B898.2060205@ape3000.com> <20100203175828.GB25630@eve.local.syslab.com> Message-ID: <20100203181850.GB14061@lex-laptop> On 03/02/10 18:58, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:58:40PM -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:55, Lauri Niskanen wrote: > > > Maybe we should just delete all packages with no votes and that have > > > been orphaned. > > > > > > -- Ape > > > > > > > That seems like a terrible idea. We should only delete packages that > > no longer exist upstream or have been merged into another package. > > +2 ;) > > -- > Florian Friesdorf > GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367 > Jabber/XMPP: flo at chaoflow.net > OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700 > IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC +100500, i explained why in my other mail to+100500 :) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From tu at dragonlord.cz Wed Feb 3 13:20:30 2010 From: tu at dragonlord.cz (Jaroslav Lichtblau) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:20:30 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <20100203174834.GB12350@lex-laptop> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> <20100203174834.GB12350@lex-laptop> Message-ID: <20100203182029.GA5238@trinity.matrix> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 06:48:34PM +0100, Lex Rivera wrote: > The main reason why a asked for it is amount of crap in AUR. I have my own repo, maybe > that's why i'm not interested in [community]. But AUR have huge list of > orphaned, outdated, obsolette packages. Most of them can be deleted, > since they have no use now. I see them nearly everyday, and... Well, i > think you catch that. AUR needs moderators. AUR must be clean. > Sorry for my bad english =( > In my opinion, the requested changes for AUR reported here are done very quickly, isn't it? And no special rights for AUR are needed to check the submitted packages. I see a lot of complexity, but I'm not sure for what added values. What should be the tasks for the AUR moderators? I can think of: - check submitted/changed PKGBUILDs (no special rights needed) - orphan/remove packages (IMO done quickly by TU's) - manage AUR accounts (same as above ...) - ? Cheers, Jaroslav -- Das beste Mittel gegen Zorn ist Abstand -- Lucius Annaeus Seneca (4-65 n.Chr.) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From djszapi at archlinux.us Wed Feb 3 13:23:35 2010 From: djszapi at archlinux.us (Laszlo Papp) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:23:35 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <20100203182029.GA5238@trinity.matrix> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> <20100203174834.GB12350@lex-laptop> <20100203182029.GA5238@trinity.matrix> Message-ID: > - check submitted/changed PKGBUILDs (no special rights needed) > - orphan/remove packages ? ? ? ? ? ?(IMO done quickly by TU's) > - manage AUR accounts ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (same as above ...) > - ? +1 ! I can think of one more thing, to develop AUR, but it can be done without this right too. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp From x-demon at x-demon.org Wed Feb 3 13:32:12 2010 From: x-demon at x-demon.org (Lex Rivera) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:32:12 +0300 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <20100203181041.GA25949@eve.local.syslab.com> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <20100203180452.418b8f01@archlinux.us> <20100203181041.GA25949@eve.local.syslab.com> Message-ID: <20100203183212.GC14061@lex-laptop> On 03/02/10 19:10, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 06:04:52PM +0000, Pierre Chapuis wrote: > > Le Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:41:38 +0100, > > Thomas B?chler a ?crit : > > > > > I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position > > > instead of calling it "Semi-TU". > > > > > > When I was a TU, I didn't care at all about moderating the AUR, and > > > maybe other TUs feel the same and rather do packaging. Conversely, you > > > don't seem to care about packaging but about AUR moderation. > > > > > > I am forwarding this to arch-dev-public for reference, but I guess > > > ultimately the TUs have to decide. > > > > I even think it could be a good idea to have "real" Trusted Users in the > > sense that they can be trusted as to which packages they publish on the > > AUR, not necessarily in binary form. They would be approved by some > > process, and then added to a list which could be used by software like > > yaourt / pakthan / bauerbill to let the users install their packages > > without checking the PKGBUILDs. The fact that a package on the AUR is > > maintained by one of these users (they would include current TUs and > > devs) would be accessible in the metadata (through the json RPC for > > example). > > > > I know there used to be a flag like that on the AUR and that it didn't > > work, but I think it's mainly because it was on a "by package" basis > > instead of a "by user" basis, which makes it a lot more work for those > > who have to check. > > > > As for what should be checked when users apply for this position, I > > would say at least: > > > > - a sufficient expertise in packaging, proved by the existence of > > several good packages maintained by them on the AUR, and > > - a means to contact them efficiently (valid email address). > > > > Anyway this is just my two cents as an Arch user, but I consider the > > lack of any way to trust AUR PKGBUILDs without reading them to be the > > thing that annoys me most with Arch as of now. > > What about a peer trust network? Publishing packages on the AUR would > involve giving an pgp public key. People sign their PKGBUILDs using > their private key. People can define trust relationships towards other > people ("I trust this person to write good PKGBUILDs" and "I trust this > person's trust in other's"). Being a TU would mean to be signed by the > TU-Authority (or whatever) and trusting the TU authority's trust would > mean you can install packages that are created by TU's. > > -- > Florian Friesdorf > GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367 > Jabber/XMPP: flo at chaoflow.net > OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700 > IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC Peer trust network? Isn't that too hard for ordinary user? Download key, import it, set trust level... If there will be some list of "Checked Users" this will be easier and friendlier. But peer trust net is nice idea anyway. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From ape at ape3000.com Wed Feb 3 13:41:34 2010 From: ape at ape3000.com (Lauri Niskanen) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:41:34 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <20100203183212.GC14061@lex-laptop> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <20100203180452.418b8f01@archlinux.us> <20100203181041.GA25949@eve.local.syslab.com> <20100203183212.GC14061@lex-laptop> Message-ID: <4B69C35E.7020202@ape3000.com> On 02/03/2010 08:32 PM, Lex Rivera wrote: > On 03/02/10 19:10, Florian Friesdorf wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 06:04:52PM +0000, Pierre Chapuis wrote: >>> Le Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:41:38 +0100, >>> Thomas B?chler a ?crit : >>> >>>> I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position >>>> instead of calling it "Semi-TU". >>>> >>>> When I was a TU, I didn't care at all about moderating the AUR, and >>>> maybe other TUs feel the same and rather do packaging. Conversely, you >>>> don't seem to care about packaging but about AUR moderation. >>>> >>>> I am forwarding this to arch-dev-public for reference, but I guess >>>> ultimately the TUs have to decide. >>> >>> I even think it could be a good idea to have "real" Trusted Users in the >>> sense that they can be trusted as to which packages they publish on the >>> AUR, not necessarily in binary form. They would be approved by some >>> process, and then added to a list which could be used by software like >>> yaourt / pakthan / bauerbill to let the users install their packages >>> without checking the PKGBUILDs. The fact that a package on the AUR is >>> maintained by one of these users (they would include current TUs and >>> devs) would be accessible in the metadata (through the json RPC for >>> example). >>> >>> I know there used to be a flag like that on the AUR and that it didn't >>> work, but I think it's mainly because it was on a "by package" basis >>> instead of a "by user" basis, which makes it a lot more work for those >>> who have to check. >>> >>> As for what should be checked when users apply for this position, I >>> would say at least: >>> >>> - a sufficient expertise in packaging, proved by the existence of >>> several good packages maintained by them on the AUR, and >>> - a means to contact them efficiently (valid email address). >>> >>> Anyway this is just my two cents as an Arch user, but I consider the >>> lack of any way to trust AUR PKGBUILDs without reading them to be the >>> thing that annoys me most with Arch as of now. >> >> What about a peer trust network? Publishing packages on the AUR would >> involve giving an pgp public key. People sign their PKGBUILDs using >> their private key. People can define trust relationships towards other >> people ("I trust this person to write good PKGBUILDs" and "I trust this >> person's trust in other's"). Being a TU would mean to be signed by the >> TU-Authority (or whatever) and trusting the TU authority's trust would >> mean you can install packages that are created by TU's. >> >> -- >> Florian Friesdorf >> GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367 >> Jabber/XMPP: flo at chaoflow.net >> OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700 >> IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC > > Peer trust network? Isn't that too hard for ordinary user? Download > key, import it, set trust level... If there will be some list of > "Checked Users" this will be easier and friendlier. But peer trust net > is nice idea anyway. I agree that peer trust network is a nice idea and that pgp keys might be unnecessary. AUR accounts are already authenticated by the web system and user can be easily coupled with the uploaded files. You should be able to upload packages without any thrust status and also downloading and installing untrusted packages should be possible. There could be packages with trusted status, so the users wouldn't have that must packages to be checked by themselves. -- Ape From flo at chaoflow.net Wed Feb 3 13:42:28 2010 From: flo at chaoflow.net (Florian Friesdorf) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:42:28 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <20100203183212.GC14061@lex-laptop> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <20100203180452.418b8f01@archlinux.us> <20100203181041.GA25949@eve.local.syslab.com> <20100203183212.GC14061@lex-laptop> Message-ID: <20100203184228.GA26766@eve.local.syslab.com> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 09:32:12PM +0300, Lex Rivera wrote: > On 03/02/10 19:10, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > > > > What about a peer trust network? Publishing packages on the AUR would > > involve giving an pgp public key. People sign their PKGBUILDs using > > their private key. People can define trust relationships towards other > > people ("I trust this person to write good PKGBUILDs" and "I trust this > > person's trust in other's"). Being a TU would mean to be signed by the > > TU-Authority (or whatever) and trusting the TU authority's trust would > > mean you can install packages that are created by TU's. > > Peer trust network? Isn't that too hard for ordinary user? Download > key, import it, set trust level... If there will be some list of > "Checked Users" this will be easier and friendlier. But peer trust net > is nice idea anyway. yaourt could ship with the TU-Auth's public key and it's default configuration could be to trust packages by people that are signed by the TU-Auth. key management should further be integrated into yoaurt (or the like) -- Florian Friesdorf GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367 Jabber/XMPP: flo at chaoflow.net OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700 IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From lists at baums-on-web.de Wed Feb 3 13:55:55 2010 From: lists at baums-on-web.de (Heiko Baums) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:55:55 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <4B69C35E.7020202@ape3000.com> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <20100203180452.418b8f01@archlinux.us> <20100203181041.GA25949@eve.local.syslab.com> <20100203183212.GC14061@lex-laptop> <4B69C35E.7020202@ape3000.com> Message-ID: <20100203195555.4f0ad31b@darkstar.galaxy.all> Am Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:41:34 +0200 schrieb Lauri Niskanen : > I agree that peer trust network is a nice idea and that pgp keys might > be unnecessary. AUR accounts are already authenticated by the web > system and user can be easily coupled with the uploaded files. > > You should be able to upload packages without any thrust status and > also downloading and installing untrusted packages should be > possible. There could be packages with trusted status, so the users > wouldn't have that must packages to be checked by themselves. This was previously implemented in and removed from AUR a long time ago. I guess there was a reason for this. I disagree that AUR needs additional moderators. That's what among others TUs are for, this is why they are called TUs, and they are doing this job really good. If you post something (deletion request, orphaning request etc.) to this mailing list it's usually done within a few minutes. Greetings, Heiko From djszapi at archlinux.us Wed Feb 3 13:55:10 2010 From: djszapi at archlinux.us (Laszlo Papp) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:55:10 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <20100203184228.GA26766@eve.local.syslab.com> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <20100203180452.418b8f01@archlinux.us> <20100203181041.GA25949@eve.local.syslab.com> <20100203183212.GC14061@lex-laptop> <20100203184228.GA26766@eve.local.syslab.com> Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 09:32:12PM +0300, Lex Rivera wrote: >> On 03/02/10 19:10, Florian Friesdorf wrote: >> > >> > What about a peer trust network? Publishing packages on the AUR would >> > involve giving an pgp public key. People sign their PKGBUILDs using >> > their private key. People can define trust relationships towards other >> > people ("I trust this person to write good PKGBUILDs" and "I trust this >> > person's trust in other's"). Being a TU would mean to be signed by the >> > TU-Authority (or whatever) and trusting the TU authority's trust would >> > mean you can install packages that are created by TU's. >> >> Peer trust network? Isn't that too hard for ordinary user? Download >> key, import it, set trust level... If there will be some list of >> "Checked Users" this will be easier and friendlier. But peer trust net >> is nice idea anyway. > > yaourt could ship with the TU-Auth's public key and it's default > configuration could be to trust packages by people that are signed by > the TU-Auth. > > key management should further be integrated into yoaurt (or the like) Yaourt is not supported officially, and it's buggy and abandoned program at this momment, and it has got a very bad design concept to parse URLs directly, so much people wouldn't like to use it ... Best Regards, Laszlo Papp From thomas at archlinux.org Wed Feb 3 13:57:21 2010 From: thomas at archlinux.org (=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Thomas_B=E4chler?=) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:57:21 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <330e48781002030744w55149717q28f0f380dfa80674@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> <20100203153700.GA19429@eve.local.syslab.com> <330e48781002030744w55149717q28f0f380dfa80674@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B69C711.5020902@archlinux.org> Am 03.02.2010 16:44, schrieb Angel Vel?squez: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Florian Friesdorf wrote: >> I'd give an AUR moderator all permissions to mess around in the AUR, be >> it packages of TUs or not. If somebody messes up, he/she can be punished >> later. Agreed. They should be responsible enough to not do any bullshit. > Well, other question > how will be the process of selection of these semi-tu ? Application, vote, done. It shouldn't be that complicated. > how will be > called the group semi-tu ? trusted but not at all? I'd simply say "AUR Moderators". We have moderators on the forum, and on the wiki, so having them on the AUR makes sense - it is in fact a bit late, the AUR is too much anarchy for my taste. I'd suggest so start the process by just voting upon Lex and if (s)he (sorry, can't determine the sex from that name, my stupidity) is approved, one will see how it goes and if it's a good idea. Then one can think about adding more moderators or not. Just KISS. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From flo at chaoflow.net Wed Feb 3 13:57:50 2010 From: flo at chaoflow.net (Florian Friesdorf) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:57:50 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <20100203180452.418b8f01@archlinux.us> <20100203181041.GA25949@eve.local.syslab.com> <20100203183212.GC14061@lex-laptop> <20100203184228.GA26766@eve.local.syslab.com> Message-ID: <20100203185750.GA1452@eve.local.syslab.com> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:55:10PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 09:32:12PM +0300, Lex Rivera wrote: > >> On 03/02/10 19:10, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > >> > > >> > What about a peer trust network? Publishing packages on the AUR would > >> > involve giving an pgp public key. People sign their PKGBUILDs using > >> > their private key. People can define trust relationships towards other > >> > people ("I trust this person to write good PKGBUILDs" and "I trust this > >> > person's trust in other's"). Being a TU would mean to be signed by the > >> > TU-Authority (or whatever) and trusting the TU authority's trust would > >> > mean you can install packages that are created by TU's. > >> > >> Peer trust network? Isn't that too hard for ordinary user? Download > >> key, import it, set trust level... If there will be some list of > >> "Checked Users" this will be easier and friendlier. But peer trust net > >> is nice idea anyway. > > > > yaourt could ship with the TU-Auth's public key and it's default > > configuration could be to trust packages by people that are signed by > > the TU-Auth. > > > > key management should further be integrated into yoaurt (or the like) > > Yaourt is not supported officially, and it's buggy and abandoned > program at this momment, and it has got a very bad design concept to > parse URLs directly, so much people wouldn't like to use it ... Well, what are people using to install packages from AUR? -- Florian Friesdorf GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367 Jabber/XMPP: flo at chaoflow.net OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700 IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From flo at chaoflow.net Wed Feb 3 14:01:59 2010 From: flo at chaoflow.net (Florian Friesdorf) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 20:01:59 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <4B69C711.5020902@archlinux.org> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> <20100203153700.GA19429@eve.local.syslab.com> <330e48781002030744w55149717q28f0f380dfa80674@mail.gmail.com> <4B69C711.5020902@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <20100203190159.GB1452@eve.local.syslab.com> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:57:21PM +0100, Thomas B?chler wrote: > I'd suggest so start the process by just voting upon Lex and if (s)he > (sorry, can't determine the sex from that name, my stupidity) is > approved, one will see how it goes and if it's a good idea. Then one can > think about adding more moderators or not. Just KISS. Following the reasoning elsewhere in this threa, that: a) TUs do a great job b) some TUs don't want to do cleanup work in the AUR c) Lex does want to do cleanup work in the AUR d) Lex does not want to take care of things in [community] and KISS: Why not make Lex a TU who puts the focus on the AUR? Just because you can write in [community] does not mean you have to. Is an application of Lex for TU sane on that base? -- Florian Friesdorf GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367 Jabber/XMPP: flo at chaoflow.net OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700 IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From x-demon at x-demon.org Wed Feb 3 14:05:22 2010 From: x-demon at x-demon.org (Lex Rivera) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 22:05:22 +0300 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <4B69C711.5020902@archlinux.org> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> <20100203153700.GA19429@eve.local.syslab.com> <330e48781002030744w55149717q28f0f380dfa80674@mail.gmail.com> <4B69C711.5020902@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <20100203190521.GD14061@lex-laptop> On 03/02/10 19:57, Thomas B?chler wrote: > Am 03.02.2010 16:44, schrieb Angel Vel?squez: > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > >> I'd give an AUR moderator all permissions to mess around in the AUR, be > >> it packages of TUs or not. If somebody messes up, he/she can be punished > >> later. > > Agreed. They should be responsible enough to not do any bullshit. > > > Well, other question > > how will be the process of selection of these semi-tu ? > > Application, vote, done. It shouldn't be that complicated. > > > how will be > > called the group semi-tu ? trusted but not at all? > > I'd simply say "AUR Moderators". We have moderators on the forum, and on > the wiki, so having them on the AUR makes sense - it is in fact a bit > late, the AUR is too much anarchy for my taste. > > I'd suggest so start the process by just voting upon Lex and if (s)he > (sorry, can't determine the sex from that name, my stupidity) is > approved, one will see how it goes and if it's a good idea. Then one can > think about adding more moderators or not. Just KISS. > Lex/Alex/Alexander. Well, before we can set moderators, we must understand how that position will work from the code side. We can of course just grant access to orphan & delete, if i understood correctly. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From catwell at archlinux.us Wed Feb 3 14:11:59 2010 From: catwell at archlinux.us (Pierre Chapuis) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:11:59 +0000 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <20100203195555.4f0ad31b@darkstar.galaxy.all> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <20100203180452.418b8f01@archlinux.us> <20100203181041.GA25949@eve.local.syslab.com> <20100203183212.GC14061@lex-laptop> <4B69C35E.7020202@ape3000.com> <20100203195555.4f0ad31b@darkstar.galaxy.all> Message-ID: <20100203191159.6db1aa93@archlinux.us> Le Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:55:55 +0100, Heiko Baums a ?crit : > Am Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:41:34 +0200 > schrieb Lauri Niskanen : > > > I agree that peer trust network is a nice idea and that pgp keys might > > be unnecessary. AUR accounts are already authenticated by the web > > system and user can be easily coupled with the uploaded files. > > > > You should be able to upload packages without any thrust status and > > also downloading and installing untrusted packages should be > > possible. There could be packages with trusted status, so the users > > wouldn't have that must packages to be checked by themselves. > > This was previously implemented in and removed from AUR a long time ago. > I guess there was a reason for this. The reason was that only TUs could flag a package as trusted, and this was done by package and not by user, so it was a lot of work. Actually, if I remember well, I even think it was done by package *revision* which means packages had to be checked by TUs every time a new version was uploaded. It obviously couldn't scale. If the trust is given at the user level, it makes it much less trouble. For example, if the average "trusted" user has 20 packages, each of which has 5 revisions in the user's account's lifetime, it divides the amount of actions necessary by 100 (although it is more complex to check that a user can be trusted than that a package is safe). It is similat to the "give the man a fish" principle Archers should be familiar with. The drawback is that it is a bit less secure, probably, because ultimately more people have to be trusted. A trust network goes even further on both aspects (more scalability, less security). I'm not sure going that far is needed but it is a neat idea. -- catwell From schivmeister at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 14:12:19 2010 From: schivmeister at gmail.com (Ray Rashif) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 03:12:19 +0800 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> <20100203174834.GB12350@lex-laptop> <20100203182029.GA5238@trinity.matrix> Message-ID: <291cdeab1002031112q273cb79ema4bcf76b6ef851b3@mail.gmail.com> I have no problem with this idea :) AM - AUR Moderator TU - Trusted User Basically, AMs are TUs who have no time/do not want to package, but would rather be PKGBUILD hunters. Allow them access to do everything a TU can on the web interface, and modify a couple of things (like the TU dashboard) to suit their role. They may moderate discussions and advise on scripting (which should be a TU's job as well). Approval process may be the same as a TU application, with similar criteria. So this does not imply a less-capable position, and would demand the same kind of individuals that would apply to become Trusted Users. I have no problem with this idea, but I am not for or against it. As can be seen from the discussion, all the tasks this particular role will handle are already the responsibility of TUs now. If this motion passes, all that will happen is a theoretical reduced workload. +0 -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD From x-demon at x-demon.org Wed Feb 3 14:12:22 2010 From: x-demon at x-demon.org (Lex Rivera) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 22:12:22 +0300 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <20100203185750.GA1452@eve.local.syslab.com> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <20100203180452.418b8f01@archlinux.us> <20100203181041.GA25949@eve.local.syslab.com> <20100203183212.GC14061@lex-laptop> <20100203184228.GA26766@eve.local.syslab.com> <20100203185750.GA1452@eve.local.syslab.com> Message-ID: <20100203191221.GE14061@lex-laptop> On 03/02/10 19:57, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:55:10PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 09:32:12PM +0300, Lex Rivera wrote: > > >> On 03/02/10 19:10, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > > >> > > > >> > What about a peer trust network? Publishing packages on the AUR would > > >> > involve giving an pgp public key. People sign their PKGBUILDs using > > >> > their private key. People can define trust relationships towards other > > >> > people ("I trust this person to write good PKGBUILDs" and "I trust this > > >> > person's trust in other's"). Being a TU would mean to be signed by the > > >> > TU-Authority (or whatever) and trusting the TU authority's trust would > > >> > mean you can install packages that are created by TU's. > > >> > > >> Peer trust network? Isn't that too hard for ordinary user? Download > > >> key, import it, set trust level... If there will be some list of > > >> "Checked Users" this will be easier and friendlier. But peer trust net > > >> is nice idea anyway. > > > > > > yaourt could ship with the TU-Auth's public key and it's default > > > configuration could be to trust packages by people that are signed by > > > the TU-Auth. > > > > > > key management should further be integrated into yoaurt (or the like) > > > > Yaourt is not supported officially, and it's buggy and abandoned > > program at this momment, and it has got a very bad design concept to > > parse URLs directly, so much people wouldn't like to use it ... > > Well, what are people using to install packages from AUR? > > -- > Florian Friesdorf > GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367 > Jabber/XMPP: flo at chaoflow.net > OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700 > IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC Yaourt is popular, but there is other good alternatives to it. I like yaourt interface, but... It's extremely slow. And not developed anymore. Compare it to packer for example. Anyway, gpg support at least for binary packages can be great, but i haven't seen any pacman gpg patches or even preluminary support. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From catwell at archlinux.us Wed Feb 3 14:19:56 2010 From: catwell at archlinux.us (Pierre Chapuis) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:19:56 +0000 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <20100203180452.418b8f01@archlinux.us> <20100203181041.GA25949@eve.local.syslab.com> <20100203183212.GC14061@lex-laptop> <20100203184228.GA26766@eve.local.syslab.com> Message-ID: <20100203191956.63589014@archlinux.us> Le Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:55:10 +0100, Laszlo Papp a ?crit : > > key management should further be integrated into yoaurt (or the like) > > Yaourt is not supported officially, and it's buggy and abandoned > program at this momment, and it has got a very bad design concept to > parse URLs directly, so much people wouldn't like to use it ... Yaourt is not abandonned, and he did say "and the like", which includes Bauerbill, Pakthan... Bauerbill already implements a way to trust users but the names of the users that can be trusted have to be configured manually. I used to dislike those wrappers very strongly when they didn't allow their user to verify PKGBUILDs. Now they all do, and that's their default behavior. I still don't use them because they wouldn't save me much time, the most time-consuming part of the installation of AUR packages being to check the PKGBUILDs. I might switch to bauerbill though, because although what it does is not enough, at least it allows me to trust selected users. -- catwell From thomas at archlinux.org Wed Feb 3 14:24:15 2010 From: thomas at archlinux.org (=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Thomas_B=E4chler?=) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:24:15 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <20100203190521.GD14061@lex-laptop> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> <20100203153700.GA19429@eve.local.syslab.com> <330e48781002030744w55149717q28f0f380dfa80674@mail.gmail.com> <4B69C711.5020902@archlinux.org> <20100203190521.GD14061@lex-laptop> Message-ID: <4B69CD5F.8080406@archlinux.org> Am 03.02.2010 20:05, schrieb Lex Rivera: > Lex/Alex/Alexander. Ah, "he" then :) > Well, before we can set moderators, we must > understand how that position will work from the code side. We can of > course just grant access to orphan & delete, if i understood correctly. IMO, just setting them as Trusted Users in the AUR interface would suffice, at least short-term. Creating an "AUR moderator" position long-term is still a possibility. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From cedric at gmx.ca Wed Feb 3 15:12:12 2010 From: cedric at gmx.ca (Cedric Staniewski) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:12:12 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Extra/AUR duplicates In-Reply-To: <4A912F9C.2010703@gmx.ca> References: <4A912F9C.2010703@gmx.ca> Message-ID: <4B69D89C.5080405@gmx.ca> Hi TUs, some more duplicates, ready for removal. :) extra ===== => haskell-extensible-exceptions http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/haskell-extensible-exceptions/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29971 => haskell-hashed-storage http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/haskell-hashed-storage/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33987 => haskell-packedstring http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/haskell-packedstring/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21719 => haskell-quickcheck http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/haskell-quickcheck/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33924 => nppangband http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/nppangband/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34118 => opengtl http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/opengtl/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28179 => perl-digest-sha1 http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/perl-digest-sha1/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29621 => xf86-input-synaptics http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/xf86-input-synaptics/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33846 community ========= => apache13 http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/apache13/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9056 => apache13-mod_accounting http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/apache13-mod_accounting/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9243 => apache13-mod_bandwidth http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/apache13-mod_bandwidth/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9055 => armagetronad http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/armagetronad/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1382 => eclipse-pydev http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/eclipse-pydev/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8871 => gpsbabel http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/gpsbabel/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9376 => haskell-http http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/haskell-http/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33917 => haskell-x11 http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/haskell-x11/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33637 => kbd-ru-keymaps http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/kbd-ru-keymaps/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8567 => perl-cpanplus-pacman http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/perl-cpanplus-pacman/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5954 => shorewall http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/shorewall/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8935 => shorewall6 http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/shorewall6/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26753 => sportstracker http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/sportstracker/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5484 => wol http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/wol/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3778 => your-freedom http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/your-freedom/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34280 Please also remove: => json-xs: duplicate of community/perl-json-xs http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18314 http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/perl-json-xs/ => zim-nightly: see comment; upstream source not available anymore http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16408 And finally, you might want to take a look at these packages. They are in community-testing now for more than four month: community-testing ================= => libsquish http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community-testing/x86_64/libsquish/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29820 => nvidia-cg-toolkit http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community-testing/x86_64/nvidia-cg-toolkit/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6239 => tinyxml http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community-testing/x86_64/tinyxml/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1155 Cedric From biru.ionut at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 15:25:36 2010 From: biru.ionut at gmail.com (Ionut Biru) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:25:36 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Extra/AUR duplicates In-Reply-To: <4B69D89C.5080405@gmx.ca> References: <4A912F9C.2010703@gmx.ca> <4B69D89C.5080405@gmx.ca> Message-ID: <4B69DBC0.7010206@gmail.com> On 02/03/2010 10:12 PM, Cedric Staniewski wrote: > Hi TUs, > some more duplicates, ready for removal. :) > some packages you meantion in community were just moved in aur, like apache13, shorewall. better regenerate the list -- Ionut From cedric at gmx.ca Wed Feb 3 15:56:48 2010 From: cedric at gmx.ca (Cedric Staniewski) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:56:48 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Extra/AUR duplicates In-Reply-To: <4B69DBC0.7010206@gmail.com> References: <4A912F9C.2010703@gmx.ca> <4B69D89C.5080405@gmx.ca> <4B69DBC0.7010206@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B69E310.40105@gmx.ca> On 03.02.2010 21:25, Ionut Biru wrote: > On 02/03/2010 10:12 PM, Cedric Staniewski wrote: >> Hi TUs, >> some more duplicates, ready for removal. :) >> > > > some packages you meantion in community were just moved in aur, like > apache13, shorewall. better regenerate the list > Oops, bad timing. Thanks you. I've added a check for 404 package pages. This new list does not contain the packages that were just removed from community anymore. extra ===== => haskell-extensible-exceptions http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/haskell-extensible-exceptions/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29971 => haskell-hashed-storage http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/haskell-hashed-storage/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33987 => haskell-packedstring http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/haskell-packedstring/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21719 => haskell-quickcheck http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/haskell-quickcheck/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33924 => nppangband http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/nppangband/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34118 => opengtl http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/opengtl/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28179 => perl-digest-sha1 http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/perl-digest-sha1/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29621 => xf86-input-synaptics http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/xf86-input-synaptics/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33846 community ========= => armagetronad http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/armagetronad/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1382 => gpsbabel http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/gpsbabel/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9376 => haskell-http http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/haskell-http/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33917 => haskell-x11 http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/haskell-x11/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33637 => wol http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/wol/ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3778 The last part remains the same though: > Please also remove: > => json-xs: duplicate of community/perl-json-xs > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18314 > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/perl-json-xs/ > > => zim-nightly: see comment; upstream source not available anymore > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16408 > > > > > > > And finally, you might want to take a look at these packages. They are > in community-testing now for more than four month: > > community-testing > ================= > => libsquish > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community-testing/x86_64/libsquish/ > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29820 > > => nvidia-cg-toolkit > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community-testing/x86_64/nvidia-cg-toolkit/ > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6239 > > => tinyxml > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community-testing/x86_64/tinyxml/ > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1155 From cmbrannon79 at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 16:07:29 2010 From: cmbrannon79 at gmail.com (Chris Brannon) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:07:29 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] Extra/AUR duplicates In-Reply-To: <4B69E310.40105@gmx.ca> References: <4A912F9C.2010703@gmx.ca> <4B69D89C.5080405@gmx.ca> <4B69DBC0.7010206@gmail.com> <4B69E310.40105@gmx.ca> Message-ID: <4b69e62d.a315f10a.679a.2abd@mx.google.com> Cedric Staniewski wrote: *MAJOR SNIPPAGE* > => haskell-hashed-storage > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/haskell-hashed-storage/ > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33987 *SNIP* > => haskell-quickcheck > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/haskell-quickcheck/ > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33924 Some of the ones in this batch are re-uploads. I deleted them from the AUR last month, but arch-haskell is re-uploading them. I sent an email to arch-haskell after the last round of Haskell removals, but I don't know whether he got it. -- Chris From louipc.ist at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 16:34:00 2010 From: louipc.ist at gmail.com (Loui Chang) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:34:00 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> Message-ID: <20100203213400.GI3771@lynn> On Wed 03 Feb 2010 09:37 -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 09:32, Lex Rivera wrote: > > Hi all. I wanna ask is it possible to become TU without [community] > > maintaining, just as AUR moderator? > > That's not currently possible. Where does it say that? From louipc.ist at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 16:44:28 2010 From: louipc.ist at gmail.com (Loui Chang) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:44:28 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <20100203181850.GB14061@lex-laptop> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> <20100203174834.GB12350@lex-laptop> <4B69B898.2060205@ape3000.com> <20100203175828.GB25630@eve.local.syslab.com> <20100203181850.GB14061@lex-laptop> Message-ID: <20100203214428.GJ3771@lynn> On Wed 03 Feb 2010 21:18 +0300, Lex Rivera wrote: > On 03/02/10 18:58, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:58:40PM -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:55, Lauri Niskanen wrote: > > > > Maybe we should just delete all packages with no votes and that have > > > > been orphaned. > > > > > > That seems like a terrible idea. We should only delete packages that > > > no longer exist upstream or have been merged into another package. > > > > +2 ;) > > +100500, i explained why in my other mail to+100500 :) Guys please stop the +X posts. It's a bit unnerving to read through threads full of these. From flo at chaoflow.net Wed Feb 3 16:42:35 2010 From: flo at chaoflow.net (Florian Friesdorf) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 22:42:35 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <20100203214428.GJ3771@lynn> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> <20100203174834.GB12350@lex-laptop> <4B69B898.2060205@ape3000.com> <20100203175828.GB25630@eve.local.syslab.com> <20100203181850.GB14061@lex-laptop> <20100203214428.GJ3771@lynn> Message-ID: <20100203214235.GA7872@eve.local.syslab.com> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 04:44:28PM -0500, Loui Chang wrote: > On Wed 03 Feb 2010 21:18 +0300, Lex Rivera wrote: > > On 03/02/10 18:58, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:58:40PM -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:55, Lauri Niskanen wrote: > > > > > Maybe we should just delete all packages with no votes and that have > > > > > been orphaned. > > > > > > > > That seems like a terrible idea. We should only delete packages that > > > > no longer exist upstream or have been merged into another package. > > > > > > +2 ;) > > > > +100500, i explained why in my other mail to+100500 :) > > Guys please stop the +X posts. > It's a bit unnerving to read through threads full of these. -1 ;) -- Florian Friesdorf GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367 Jabber/XMPP: flo at chaoflow.net OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700 IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From xyne at archlinux.ca Wed Feb 3 19:34:21 2010 From: xyne at archlinux.ca (Xyne) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 01:34:21 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <20100203171631.GA8597@lex-laptop> References: <4B699D2D.8030908@gmail.com> <20100203171631.GA8597@lex-laptop> Message-ID: <20100204013421.515065e8@archlinux.ca> > That's the main reason why i asked for it. I have my own repo, maybe > that's why i'm not interested in [community]. But AUR have huge list of > orphaned, outdated, obsolette packages. Most of them can be deleted, > since they have no use now. I see them nearly everyday, and... Well, i > think you catch that. AUR needs moderators. AUR must be clean. > Sorry for my bad english =( That's the second time you've chanted the "AUR needs moderators. AUR must be clean." mantra. I strongly disagree with your conception of "clean". Many orphans and other neglected package in the AUR could easily updated by anyone who's interested in them. It doesn't hurt to have them there either, so why should we remove them? There are admittedly some packages which are completely dead upstream, or which are truly obsolete for other such reasons (changes in revision control, etc), but I do not want to see a team of "seek-and-destroy moderators" combing the AUR for every little package they can delete. That will just lead to a loss of potentially good packaging starting points. The other issue is trust. The argument put forward so far has been that because AUR moderators have limited powers, they may be appointed with less consideration. Even if they can't access official binary repos, they could still do some major damage if they were so inclined. Imagine an AUR moderator who writes a script to simultaneous adopt several popular packages and upload malware in their place. It would be quickly detected and the moderator status could be revoked along with a heavy blow of the ever-so-frightening banhammer, but how many users might be affected within that window? AUR mods would have to be trusted and then one has to ask what the difference between and AUR mod and a TU would be. A whole new position just to create a slightly crippled TU account doesn't make sense to me, especially considering how well the current system works. There isn't exactly a flood of AUR requests inundating this list to the point where TUs can't keep up. I'm actually happily surprised on the rare occasions that I am the first one to find and handle such a request. I think a better solution, if there is even a problem to begin with, is to create a TU dashboard for the AUR and add buttons to the interface to request adoption or deletion. Adoption requests could send an email to the maintainer and then a TU could see on the dashboard how long ago the email was sent, along with other information such as how long a package has been flagged out of date and when the maintainer was last active. Using that information, the TU could then decide to approve the adoption, which would then transfer the file directly to that user. The adoption request button could also only appear after the package has been flagged out-of-date for a while, or using some other conditional metric such as maintainer inactivity. It would also make it clear that a user who requests a deletion is the same user how uploaded the package (or is the current maintainer). On the related issue of a network of trust for AUR users, the proposed suggestions, while interesting, are just too complicated to get implemented. We can't even get signing for official packages and the general spirit around innovation, at least as I've perceived it, is not one of enthusiasm. A more practical approach would be to extend the voting system to enable users to vote confidence points for other users. Just add a "Trust Level" or whatever to the web page and JSON output. TUs would naturally have some special status (e.g. "TU" instead of the vote count, and TU's votes could also be considered specially, which would enable TUs to effectively tag users which they trust. This framework could be incorporated into AUR frontends (I would definitely support it in Bauerbill). Along with the votes one would need to see who voted though, to prevent manipulated vote counts via botting. A new search type would probably be needed on the RPC interface, which would let you search by user. The results would contain an array named "trusts" and the names of AUR users trusted by the user, "trusted by" with an array of users that trust the user, and "trust level" of whatever, which shows "TU", "TU-trusted", or the number of votes (thinking out loud here). From allan at archlinux.org Wed Feb 3 19:37:47 2010 From: allan at archlinux.org (Allan McRae) Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:37:47 +1000 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <4B69CD5F.8080406@archlinux.org> References: <20100203143243.GA23410@lex-laptop> <4B698B22.5070503@archlinux.org> <4b699564.a915f10a.0b53.31c4@mx.google.com> <330e48781002030731t64902c70jbea0d1fa173d191f@mail.gmail.com> <20100203153700.GA19429@eve.local.syslab.com> <330e48781002030744w55149717q28f0f380dfa80674@mail.gmail.com> <4B69C711.5020902@archlinux.org> <20100203190521.GD14061@lex-laptop> <4B69CD5F.8080406@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <4B6A16DB.70204@archlinux.org> On 04/02/10 05:24, Thomas B?chler wrote: > IMO, just setting them as Trusted Users in the AUR interface would > suffice, at least short-term. Creating an "AUR moderator" position > long-term is still a possibility. It should almost suffice in the long term... That gives them full permissions on the AUR and no permissions for the [community] repo. The only thing they would have access to that maybe they should not is TU voting. Allan From yugrotavele at archlinux.us Wed Feb 3 20:29:04 2010 From: yugrotavele at archlinux.us (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=A7_Mark_=A7?=) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:29:04 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] Orphan request Message-ID: <4B6A22E0.80506@archlinux.us> Could you please orphan http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2476 The current maintainer has not updated this package since the end of November nor has he responded to any of my emails requesting an update or to orphan package. Thanks Mark -- Registered Linux User # 424781 Registered Linux Computer # 364703 Smarter, Faster, Better... Arch Linux From daenyth+arch at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 20:32:03 2010 From: daenyth+arch at gmail.com (Daenyth Blank) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 20:32:03 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Orphan request In-Reply-To: <4B6A22E0.80506@archlinux.us> References: <4B6A22E0.80506@archlinux.us> Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 20:29, ? Mark ? wrote: > Could you please orphan http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2476 Done From ilbardo at gmail.com Thu Feb 4 06:57:01 2010 From: ilbardo at gmail.com (bardo) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 12:57:01 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] [FYI] Two new packages in community: libcuefile and libreplaygain Message-ID: I finally managed to build the last musepack-tools release, but it now needs two small libraries (and relative headers) also published by the Musepack Team. I'm going to upload them as dependencies. Corrado From andrea at archlinux.org Thu Feb 4 07:17:16 2010 From: andrea at archlinux.org (Andrea Scarpino) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:17:16 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] exim maintainer wanted In-Reply-To: <330e48781002011855j6ca8bfc7i8c0154abb25790a4@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B664598.5040107@archlinux.org> <4B6756F9.8000400@yahoo.com.ar> <330e48781002011855j6ca8bfc7i8c0154abb25790a4@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <201002041317.17611.andrea@archlinux.org> On Tuesday 02 February 2010 03:55:38 Angel Vel?squez wrote: > Allan, > > I would like to maintain it if nobody of the devs wanna maintain it, > so you can move it to [community], exim moved to [community]. You can take it angvp. Cheers -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer From andrea at archlinux.org Thu Feb 4 07:37:04 2010 From: andrea at archlinux.org (Andrea Scarpino) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:37:04 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Orphans in [community]-any In-Reply-To: <4B67F200.1010609@archlinux.us> References: <4B5BA396.6020807@yahoo.com.ar> <20100201174543.0dad085d@wrongboolean.org> <4B67F200.1010609@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <201002041337.05294.andrea@archlinux.org> On Tuesday 02 February 2010 10:36:00 Daniel Griffiths wrote: > Here's the first batch of orphans in [community]. These are all in > arch=('any'). They are listed by last maintainer where possible, last > updater if no maintainer is listed. If no one wants to adopt them they > will be dropped to AUR. Please Daniel, when you remove a package remember to remove manually the package dir from community/ too. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer From biru.ionut at gmail.com Thu Feb 4 07:44:48 2010 From: biru.ionut at gmail.com (Ionut Biru) Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:44:48 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Orphans in [community]-any In-Reply-To: <201002041337.05294.andrea@archlinux.org> References: <4B5BA396.6020807@yahoo.com.ar> <20100201174543.0dad085d@wrongboolean.org> <4B67F200.1010609@archlinux.us> <201002041337.05294.andrea@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <4B6AC140.5070008@gmail.com> On 02/04/2010 02:37 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > On Tuesday 02 February 2010 10:36:00 Daniel Griffiths wrote: >> Here's the first batch of orphans in [community]. These are all in >> arch=('any'). They are listed by last maintainer where possible, last >> updater if no maintainer is listed. If no one wants to adopt them they >> will be dropped to AUR. > Please Daniel, when you remove a package remember to remove manually the > package dir from community/ too. > i've seen the community cleanup script does a lazy job -- Ionut From malte at zearan.de Thu Feb 4 08:02:20 2010 From: malte at zearan.de (Malte Rabenseifner) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:02:20 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Status of Shorewall and Shorewall6 Message-ID: Greetings TUs, I just want to ask about the status of Shorewall and Shorewall6. I agree that it is worth keeping in [community] but it has been dropped to AUR several hours ago. Now it is back in [community], my AUR packages (that I initially just adopted) are deleted again. I am willing to maintain it in AUR but first of all please clarify whether it should be maintained in AUR or orphaned in [community]. =) Best regards, -- Malte Rabenseifner malte at zearan.de Germany -- Vor dem Wissen kommt das Verstehen. Vor dem Verstehen kommt das Sehen. Vor dem Sehen kommt das Erkennen. Vor dem Erkennen kommt das Wissen. -- Beneath knowing, understanding. Beneath understanding, seeing. Beneath seeing, recognizing. Beneath recognizing, knowing. -- From andrea at archlinux.org Thu Feb 4 08:14:37 2010 From: andrea at archlinux.org (Andrea Scarpino) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:14:37 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Status of Shorewall and Shorewall6 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201002041414.38132.andrea@archlinux.org> On Thursday 04 February 2010 14:02:20 Malte Rabenseifner wrote: > Greetings TUs, > > I just want to ask about the status of Shorewall and Shorewall6. I agree > that it is worth keeping in [community] but it has been dropped to AUR > several hours ago. Now it is back in [community], my AUR packages (that I > initially just adopted) are deleted again. > I am willing to maintain it in AUR but first of all please clarify whether > it should be maintained in AUR or orphaned in [community]. =) > > Best regards, I cannot believe this happen to you again ^^ Story: Daniel moved it to AUR, I updated it on [community] (communitypkg did not tell me nothing because shorewall root dir on SVN still was there), then I removed it and said to Malte to upload it on AUR. Now I do not know who removed it, but you can re-re-upload it on AUR. Hoping TUs are reading this thread... -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer From massimiliano.torromeo at gmail.com Thu Feb 4 09:15:23 2010 From: massimiliano.torromeo at gmail.com (Massimiliano Torromeo) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:15:23 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request Message-ID: <3ef1684e1002040615h5b0df61fq4fa8bc16195d232a@mail.gmail.com> Hi, please delete my aur package virtuoso-opensource since it is in testing and will be officially supported by arch. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24036 Thanks. From pressh at gmail.com Thu Feb 4 09:17:21 2010 From: pressh at gmail.com (Ronald van Haren) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:17:21 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request In-Reply-To: <3ef1684e1002040615h5b0df61fq4fa8bc16195d232a@mail.gmail.com> References: <3ef1684e1002040615h5b0df61fq4fa8bc16195d232a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <9fcf70361002040617j2aa13859wad893e38828e4a4@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Massimiliano Torromeo wrote: > Hi, > please delete my aur package virtuoso-opensource since it is in > testing and will be officially supported by arch. > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24036 > > Thanks. > let's wait until it is in [extra] Ronald From schivmeister at gmail.com Thu Feb 4 09:24:19 2010 From: schivmeister at gmail.com (Ray Rashif) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 22:24:19 +0800 Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request In-Reply-To: <3ef1684e1002040615h5b0df61fq4fa8bc16195d232a@mail.gmail.com> References: <3ef1684e1002040615h5b0df61fq4fa8bc16195d232a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <291cdeab1002040624k3ac8ec5dgbc82d3ca51792da5@mail.gmail.com> Wait til it gets to extra. Currently it's an orphan. On 04/02/2010, Massimiliano Torromeo wrote: > Hi, > please delete my aur package virtuoso-opensource since it is in > testing and will be officially supported by arch. > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24036 > > Thanks. > -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD From massimiliano.torromeo at gmail.com Thu Feb 4 14:12:03 2010 From: massimiliano.torromeo at gmail.com (Massimiliano Torromeo) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 20:12:03 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request In-Reply-To: <291cdeab1002040624k3ac8ec5dgbc82d3ca51792da5@mail.gmail.com> References: <3ef1684e1002040615h5b0df61fq4fa8bc16195d232a@mail.gmail.com> <291cdeab1002040624k3ac8ec5dgbc82d3ca51792da5@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <3ef1684e1002041112v229237f0rdead75e0e65934c7@mail.gmail.com> Ok, no problem, but it is outdated now and I have little interest in updating it. Guess I'll abandon it so that it can be adopted by someone that is interested in keeping it updated. Regards. On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: > Wait til it gets to extra. Currently it's an orphan. > > On 04/02/2010, Massimiliano Torromeo wrote: >> Hi, >> please delete my aur package virtuoso-opensource since it is in >> testing and will be officially supported by arch. >> >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24036 >> >> Thanks. >> > > > -- > GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD > From biru.ionut at gmail.com Thu Feb 4 16:03:19 2010 From: biru.ionut at gmail.com (Ionut Biru) Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:03:19 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] oss maintainer needed Message-ID: <4B6B3617.2000703@gmail.com> Hi TUs, any of you are using oss? Now that Paulo has resigned, oss has no maintainer anymore and we have a bug pending on bugtracker. I can't do any fixes or maintenance since i don't use it and i don't intend to use it. -- Ionut From ghost1227 at archlinux.us Thu Feb 4 18:00:19 2010 From: ghost1227 at archlinux.us (Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:00:19 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] oss maintainer needed In-Reply-To: <4B6B3617.2000703@gmail.com> References: <4B6B3617.2000703@gmail.com> Message-ID: <8a2b1b591002041500v242824d3sf1902d4093bc9470@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: > Hi TUs, > > any of you are using oss? ?Now that Paulo has resigned, oss has no > maintainer anymore and we have a bug pending on bugtracker. I can't do any > fixes or maintenance since i don't use it and i don't intend to use it. > > -- > Ionut > I'll take it. From atsutane at freethoughts.de Thu Feb 4 18:03:02 2010 From: atsutane at freethoughts.de (Thorsten =?ISO-8859-1?B?VPZwcGVy?=) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 00:03:02 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining? In-Reply-To: <20100204013421.515065e8@archlinux.ca> References: <4B699D2D.8030908@gmail.com> <20100203171631.GA8597@lex-laptop> <20100204013421.515065e8@archlinux.ca> Message-ID: <20100205000302.5010ce7f@hell> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224 On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 01:34:21 +0100 Xyne wrote: > That's the second time you've chanted the "AUR needs moderators. AUR > must be clean." mantra. I strongly disagree with your conception of > "clean". Many orphans and other neglected package in the AUR could > easily updated by anyone who's interested in them. It doesn't hurt to > have them there either, so why should we remove them? > > There are admittedly some packages which are completely dead upstream, > or which are truly obsolete for other such reasons (changes in > revision control, etc), but I do not want to see a team of > "seek-and-destroy moderators" combing the AUR for every little > package they can delete. That will just lead to a loss of potentially > good packaging starting points. I fully agree with Xyne here, as long as sources are available, the PKGBUILDs should be kept in AUR, even if they're outdated, who knows if not someone will take it in a month, update it and maybe even the whole project revives. Keeping them does not hurt. > The other issue is trust. The argument put forward so far has been > that because AUR moderators have limited powers, they may be > appointed with less consideration. Even if they can't access official > binary repos, they could still do some major damage if they were so > inclined. Imagine an AUR moderator who writes a script to > simultaneous adopt several popular packages and upload malware in > their place. It would be quickly detected and the moderator status > could be revoked along with a heavy blow of the ever-so-frightening > banhammer, but how many users might be affected within that window? > > AUR mods would have to be trusted and then one has to ask what the > difference between and AUR mod and a TU would be. A whole new position > just to create a slightly crippled TU account doesn't make sense to > me, especially considering how well the current system works. There > isn't exactly a flood of AUR requests inundating this list to the > point where TUs can't keep up. I'm actually happily surprised on the > rare occasions that I am the first one to find and handle such a > request. I thought about that the last hours and I also did not came up with any real reason for that. Actually I myself am focusing on requests that are sent here to the list under the week, as I am not able to build packages when I'm at the university. Still I can read mails and use the browser while making notes to the lecture, so I don't think it's wrong if a TU doesn't want to maintain packages, but just keep an eye at the AUR. > I think a better solution, if there is even a problem to begin with, > is to create a TU dashboard for the AUR and add buttons to the > interface to request adoption or deletion. Adoption requests could > send an email to the maintainer and then a TU could see on the > dashboard how long ago the email was sent, along with other > information such as how long a package has been flagged out of date > and when the maintainer was last active. Using that information, the > TU could then decide to approve the adoption, which would then > transfer the file directly to that user. The adoption request button > could also only appear after the package has been flagged out-of-date > for a while, or using some other conditional metric such as > maintainer inactivity. > > It would also make it clear that a user who requests a deletion is the > same user how uploaded the package (or is the current maintainer). That sounds good, however I haven't looked at the Code of the AUR so I don't know how much work it'll be to implement that. > On the related issue of a network of trust for AUR users, the proposed > suggestions, while interesting, are just too complicated to get > implemented. We can't even get signing for official packages and the > general spirit around innovation, at least as I've perceived it, is > not one of enthusiasm. A more practical approach would be to extend > the voting system to enable users to vote confidence points for other > users. Just add a "Trust Level" or whatever to the web page and > JSON output. > > TUs would naturally have some special status (e.g. "TU" instead of the > vote count, and TU's votes could also be considered specially, which > would enable TUs to effectively tag users which they trust. This > framework could be incorporated into AUR frontends (I would > definitely support it in Bauerbill). > > Along with the votes one would need to see who voted though, to > prevent manipulated vote counts via botting. A new search type would > probably be needed on the RPC interface, which would let you search > by user. The results would contain an array named "trusts" and the > names of AUR users trusted by the user, "trusted by" with an array of > users that trust the user, and "trust level" of whatever, which shows > "TU", "TU-trusted", or the number of votes (thinking out loud here). I don't think that's a bad idea, however I'm still thinking about the way it'll change the behaviour of users. Atsutane - -- Jabber: atsutane at freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iFYEARELAAYFAktrUiYACgkQOeTxfyla+/RAbADeIXkw8AAk3yP4w7qOBecClPVV lRvjqZL7Zuk7FgDfVewSTYHkhPVsQgcjRCVaZ8VxLspKaHUFwCdY1Q== =+J2s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From ghost1227 at archlinux.us Fri Feb 5 03:03:49 2010 From: ghost1227 at archlinux.us (Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)) Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:03:49 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list Message-ID: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> The following is a complete list of all current orphans in [community]. All packages are organized by last known maintainer. If a maintainer is not listed or that maintainer is no longer a TU/Dev, it is categorized as no maintainer at the end of the list. Please read through the list and re-adopt any packages you are still willing to maintain. Last Maintainer: Alexander Fehr mget Depends: ruby,wget Required by: none Last Maintainer: Allan McRae aqpm Depends: pacman,polkit-qt Required by: shaman barrage Depends: sdl_mixer Required by: none flickrnet Depends: mono Required by: none gnome-keyring-sharp-svn Depends: ndesk-dbus Required by: gnome-do kakasi Depends: none Required by: perl-text-kakasi notify-sharp-svn Depends: gtk-sharp-2,ndesk-dbus-glib Required by: gnome-do Last Maintainer: Andrea Scarpino interlis-compiler Depends: java-runtime Required by: umleditor mercury Depends: java-runtime,libxss,libxt Required by: none python-openbabel Depends: python,openbabel Required by: none ruby-rcairo Depends: cairo,ruby Required by: ruby-gtk2 teagtk Depends: curl,enchant,gtksourceview2 Required by: none tmsnc Depends: ncurses,openssl Required by: none Last Maintainer: Angel 'angvp' Velasquez obby Depends: avahi,net6 Required by: gobby Last Maintainer: Corrado Primier libcuefile Depends: glibc Required by: musepack-tools libreplaygain Depends: glibc Required by: musepack-tools musepack-tools Depends: libcuefile,libreplaygain Required by: none Last Maintainer: dibblethewrecker dibblethewrecker.at.jiwe.dot.org dgpsip Depends: glibc Required by: none gdal (out of date) Depends: geos,libgeotiff,libjpeg,libpng,libtiff,mysql,netcdf,postgresql,python,python-numpy,sqlite3 Required by: gdal-grass,grass,thuban,thuban-svn gdal-grass Depends: gdal,grass Required by: none gen2shp Depends: shapelib Required by: none geos (out of date) Depends: gcc-libs Required by: gdal,postgis gkrellmpc Depends: curl,gkrellm Required by: none gpsmanshp Depends: bash,shapelib,tcl Required by: none gquilt Depends: pygtk,quilt Required by: none grass (out of date) Depends: gdal,libjpeg,libpng,libtiff,mesa,proj,python,sqlite3,swig,tk,xorg-server Required by: gdal-grass,qgis hacburn Depends: cddb_get,cdrtools,glib-perl,gtk2,gtk2-perl,lame,mpg321,perl,vorbis-tools,xorg-server Required by: none libscigraphica Depends: gtk2+extra,libxml2,perlxml,python-numarray Required by: scigraphica lrmi Depends: glibc Required by: none magickthumbnail Depends: rox,rox-lib Required by: none mime-editor Depends: pygtk,python,rox-lib,shared-mime-info Required by: none miscsplashutils Depends: freetype2 Required by: none opendx Depends: imagemagick,lesstif,netcdf Required by: none qgis (out of date) Depends: curl,giflib,grass,gsl,jasper,pyqt,python,qt,xerces-c Required by: none scigraphica Depends: imlib,libscigraphica,libxml2,perl-xml-simple Required by: none shp2svg Depends: perl-math-round,postgis Required by: none tclgeomap Depends: glibc,tcl Required by: tkgeomap,tkgm_util thuban Depends: gdal,python-pysqlite-legacy,wxgtk,wxpython Required by: none thuban-svn Depends: gdal,python-pysqlite-legacy,wxgtk,wxpython Required by: none tkgeomap Depends: tclgeomap,tk Required by: tkgm_util tkgm_util Depends: tclgeomap,tkgeomap Required by: none videothumbnail Depends: rox,rox-lib,mplayer Required by: none Last Maintainer: Douglas Soares de Andrade aqua-data-studio (out of date) Depends: j2re Required by: none atk-docs Depends: none Required by: none cvs-feature Depends: glibc,heimdal Required by: none epydoc Depends: python Required by: none flamerobin Depends: libfbclient,wxgtk Required by: none gazpacho Depends: kiwi Required by: none grub-gfx Depends: ncurses Required by: none kiwi Depends: pygtk Required by: flumotion,gazpacho,pida kpogre Depends: kdelibs3,libpqxx Required by: none man-pages-pt_br Depends: man-pages Required by: none mysql-ruby Depends: libmysqlclient,ruby Required by: none psqlodbc Depends: unixodbc Required by: none psyco Depends: glibc,python Required by: none pygoocanvas Depends: goocanvas,pygtk,python Required by: pitivi python Depends: db,python Required by: none python-clientform Depends: python Required by: python-mechanize python-constraint Depends: python Required by: none python-mechanize Depends: python-clientform Required by: none python-numarray Depends: python Required by: libscigraphica python-pyparallel Depends: python Required by: none python-pypdf Depends: python Required by: none python-pyro Depends: python Required by: none python-pyserial Depends: python Required by: none python-pyx Depends: python,texlive-core Required by: none Last Maintainer: Eric Belanger cube Depends: enet,libgl,mesa,sdl_image,sdl_mixer Required by: none Last Maintainer: Geoffroy Carrier cgmail Depends: dbus-python,gnome-python-desktop,notification-daemon,python Required by; none comgt Depends: hsolink,pygtk Required by: none firehol Depends: gawk,iproute,iptables Required by: none gimp-mathmap (out of date) Depends: giflib,gimp,gsl,gtksourceview Required by: none jgoodies-looks Depends: java-runtime Required by: java-flexdock luarocks Depends: lua Required by: none mitter Depends: pygtk,python Required by: none noyau Depends: bash Required by: none ozerocdoff Depends: none Required by: hsoconnect,hsolink protege (out of date) Depends: java-runtime Required by: none python-memcached Depends: python Required by: none r8101 Depends: none Required by: none rezero Depends: none Required by: none ruby-sqlite3 Depends: ruby,sqlite3 Required by: none slimevolley Depends: sdl_image,sdl_net,sdl_ttf Required by: none tango-generator Depends: dbus-python,imagemagick,librsvg,pygtk,pyxdg,shared-mime-info,xdg-utils Required by: none texlive-dot2texi Depends: dot2tex,texlive-core,texlive-latexextra,texlive-pstricks Required by: none ucl Depends: none Required by: none urlgrabber Depends: python Required by: none xtmsplit Depends: gcc-libs Required by: none zisofs-tools Depends: cdrkit Required by: none Last Maintainer: Giovanni Scafora iasl Depends: glibc Required by: none omniorb Depends: gcc-libs,openssl,python Required by: gambas2 toolame Depends: glibc Required by: dvd-slideshow Last Maintainer: Hugo Doria aspell-pt_br Depends: aspell Required by: none gtk-candido-engine Depends: gtk2 Required by: none openlh-client Depends: dbus-glib,dbus-python,gnome-panel,gnome-python,openlh-core,openlh-server,pygtk,xdg-utils Required by: none openlh-core Depends: python,python-gnutls Required by: openlh-client,openlh-server openlh-server Depends: gnome-python,openlh-core,pygtk,python-sqlalchemy,xdg-utils Required by: openlh-client python-certtool Depends: gnutls,python Required by: none Last Maintainer: Jan de Groot libgdamm Depends: libgda,glibmm Required by: glom Last Maintainer: Jaroslaw Swierczynski libcgi Depends: glibc Required by: none linuxtv-dvb-apps Depends: glibc Required by: none multimux Depends: none Required by: any2dvd nepim Depends: liboop Required by: none sauerbraten Depends: desktop-file-utils,hicolor-icon-theme,libgl,mesa,sdl_image,sdl_mixer Required by: none stegdetect Depends: glibc Required by: none Last Maintainer: Jeff Mickey castget Depends: curl,glib2,id3lib,libxml2 Required by: none cjc Depends: python-pyxmpp Required by: none cppunit Depends: none Required by: none ctemplate Depends: gcc-libs Required by: none cxxtest Depends: gcc,perl Required by: none fdm Depends: openssl,tdb,zlib Required by: none icomplete Depends: ctags,vim Required by: none ipcheck Depends: python Required by: none live-f1 Depends: heimdal,neon Required by: none lomoco Depends: libusb Required by: none raggle Depends: ruby,ruby-ncurses Required by: none ruby-ncurses Depends: ruby Required by: raggle speedometer Depends: python-urwid Required by: none tdl Depends: ncurses Required by: none vsound Depends: sox Required by: none Last Maintainer: Mateusz Herych libmirage Depends: glib2,libsndfile Required by: cdemu-daemon vhba-module Depends: kernel26 Required by: cdemu-daemon Last Maintainer: Roman Kyrylych aspell-uk Depends: aspell Required by: none bakery Depends: gconfmm,gnome-vfsmm,gtkmm,libglademm,libxml++ Required by: none colorer Depends: gcc Required by: mc-colorer esekeyd Depends: glibc Required by: none glom (out of date) Depends: gconfmm,gnome-python-extras,goocanvasmm,iso-codes,libepc,libgdamm,libgtksourceviewmm2,libxml++,postgresql,pygtk Required by: none iniparser Depends: glibc Required by: none libgtksourceviewmm2 Depends: gtkmm,gtksourceview2 Required by: glom,gobby libxnvctrl Depends: none Required by: none mc-colorer Depends: colorer,e2fsprogs,glib2,gpm Required by: none network-ups-tools Depends: hal,openssl Required by: none pessulus Depends: gconf,gnome-python Required by: none superswitcher Depends: gconf,libwnck,dbus-glib Required by: none webfs Depends: openssl Required by: none wzdftpd Depends: avahi,gnutls,pam,tcl Required by: none Last Maintainer: Ronald van Haren sqlite2 Depends: readline Required by: gambas2,python-pysqlite-legacy Last Maintainer: Sergej Pupykin eclipse-epic Depends: eclipse,perl Required by: none gtypist Depends: ncurses,perl Required by: none lockdev Depends: none Required by: schroot mpdcon Depends: gnustep-back Required by: none mt-daapd Depends: avahi,gdbm,libid3tag Required by: none nas Depends: libxaw Required by: none ncpfs Depends: none Required by: none postfix-policyd-spf-perl Depends: perl-mail-spf,perl-netaddr-ip Required by: none python-lcms Depends: lcms,libtiff,python Required by: sk1 siefs Depends: fuse Required by: none torcs-data Depends: none Required by: none uswsusp Depends: libgcrypt,libx86,lzo2 Required by: none wml Depends: perl,libpng,gdbm,db,ncurses Required by: none Last Maintainer: Stefan Husmann diacanvas Depends: gnome-python,libgnomecanvas,libgnomeprint Required by: gnuconcept partlibrary Depends: bash Required by: none ruby-atk Depends: atk,ruby,ruby-glib2 Required by: ruby-gtk2 ruby-gconf2 Depends: gconf,ruby-glib2 Required by: none ruby-gdkpixbuf2 Depends: gtk2,ruby-glib2 Required by: ruby-gtk2 ruby-gettext Depends: gettext,ruby-locale Required by: none ruby-glib2 Depends: glib2,ruby Required by: ruby-atk,ruby-gconf2,ruby-gdkpixbuf2,ruby-gtk2,ruby-pango ruby-gnomecanvas Depends: libgnomecanvas,ruby-gtk2,ruby-libart Required by: ruby-gnome2 ruby-gtk2 Depends: ruby-atk,ruby-gdkpixbuf2,ruby-glib2,ruby-pango,ruby-rcairo Required by: ruby-gnomecanvas,ruby-libglade ruby-hpricot Depends: ruby Required by: none ruby-libglade Depends: libglade,ruby-gtk2 Required by: none ruby-locale Depends: ruby Required by: ruby-gettext ruby-pango Depends: pango,ruby-glib2 Required by: ruby-gtk2 vamps Depends: libdvdread Required by: none Last Maintainer: Thayer Williams bbpager Depends: gcc-libs,glibc,libsm,libx11,libxft Required by: none lal Depends: libxft Required by: none Last Maintainer: Vesa Kaihlavirta pantomime Depends: gnustep-back,openssl Required by: gnumail schismtracker Depends: sdl,gcc Required by: none Last Maintainer: None abyssws Depends: glibc Required by: none adns Depends: glibc Required by: adns-python,gnunet,gnunet-gtk,liboop arpack Depends: glibc Required by: freemat assaultcube Depends: mesa,openal,sdl_image,sdl_mixer Required by: none autocutsel Depends: libxaw Required by: none chuck Depends: gcc-libs,libsndfile Required by: none dumb Depends: allegro,glibc Required by: none exim Depends: db,openssl,pam,pcre,tcp_wrappers Required by: none gufw (out of date) Depends: gksu,gnome-python,pygtk,sudo,ufw Required by: none hal-cups-utils Depends: dbus,glib2,hal,system-config-printer Required by: none jump-project Depends: java-xerces2,junit Required by: jump-roadmatcher jump-roadmatcher Depends: jump-project Required by: none keyboardcast Depends: libglade,libwnck,libxmu Required by: none libatomic_ops Depends: none Required by: none libfakekey Depends: libxtst Required by: matchbox-keyboard libgtksourceviewmm Depends: gtkmm,gtksourceview Required by: none liboop Depends: adns,glib,glib2,readline Required by: nepim librsync Depends: bzip2,popt,zlib Required by: duplicity,rdiff-backup libupnp Depends: glibc Required by: ushare libzdb Depends: libmysqlclient,postgresql-libs,sqlite3 Required by: none mezogis Depends: postgis,pygtk,python-geotypes Required by: none metakit Depends: gcc-libs Required by: gourmet mpgtx Depends: none Required by: any2dvd net6 Depends: gnutls,libsigc++2.0 Required by: obby nextaw Depends: libxmu Required by: none plan9port (out of date) Depends: x-server Required by: none polymer Depends: qt3 Required by: none pork Depends: ncurses,perl Required by: none python-geotypes Depends: python-psycopg1 Required by: mezogis python-jinja Depends: python Required by: python-sphinx python-psycopg1 Depends: postgresql,python-egenix-mx-base Required by: python-geotypes rox-lib Depends: pygtk,python Required by: magickthumbnail,mime-editor,videothumbnail ruby-gnome2 Depends: libgnomeui,ruby-gnomecanvas Required by: none ruby-libart Depends: libart-lgpl,libjpeg,libpng,ruby Required by: ruby-gnomecanvas ruby-mpd Depends: ruby Required by: none shapelib Depends: glibc Required by: gen2shp,gpsmanshp trickle Depends: libevent Required by: none ufw Depends: iptables,python Required by: gufw webboard Depends: gnome-panel,gnome-python Required by: none wmname Depends: libx11 Required by: none From allan at archlinux.org Fri Feb 5 03:19:23 2010 From: allan at archlinux.org (Allan McRae) Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:19:23 +1000 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <4B6BD48B.1050109@archlinux.org> On 05/02/10 18:03, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) wrote: > Last Maintainer: Allan McRae > aqpm > Depends: pacman,polkit-qt > Required by: shaman Adopted All the rest were adopted out when I was getting rid of a large number of my [community] packages. > flickrnet > Depends: mono > Required by: none I think that was required for gnome-do (optdep?) > kakasi > Depends: none > Required by: perl-text-kakasi That is/was for xmltv. From catwell at archlinux.us Fri Feb 5 05:16:00 2010 From: catwell at archlinux.us (Pierre Chapuis) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:16:00 +0000 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <20100205101600.78580d6a@archlinux.us> Le Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:03:49 -0600, "Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)" a ?crit : > luarocks > Depends: lua > Required by: none If nobody wants it I can take it in AUR, but I hope not, it belongs in community. From cmbrannon79 at gmail.com Fri Feb 5 05:27:00 2010 From: cmbrannon79 at gmail.com (Chris Brannon) Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 04:27:00 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <20100205101600.78580d6a@archlinux.us> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> <20100205101600.78580d6a@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <4b6bf30c.5444f10a.2a68.47dd@mx.google.com> Pierre Chapuis wrote: > Le Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:03:49 -0600, > "Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)" a =E9crit : > > > luarocks > > Depends: lua > > Required by: none > > If nobody wants it I can take it in AUR, but I hope not, it belongs in > community. Adopted. -- Chris From giovanni at archlinux.org Fri Feb 5 05:47:17 2010 From: giovanni at archlinux.org (Giovanni Scafora) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:47:17 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> Message-ID: 2010/2/5, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) : > Last Maintainer: Giovanni Scafora > iasl > Depends: glibc > Required by: none > omniorb > Depends: gcc-libs,openssl,python > Required by: gambas2 > toolame > Depends: glibc > Required by: dvd-slideshow I just adoped iasl. I will not maintain omniorb and toolame anymore. -- Arch Linux Developer http://www.archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.it From foutrelis at gmail.com Fri Feb 5 06:29:25 2010 From: foutrelis at gmail.com (Evangelos Foutras) Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:29:25 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <4B6C0115.3050405@gmail.com> Thanks for creating the list Daniel. /me adopted librsync and python-jinja. Cheers. :) From pressh at gmail.com Fri Feb 5 08:07:30 2010 From: pressh at gmail.com (Ronald van Haren) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:07:30 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <9fcf70361002050507l75d3b6cbj321cce8f15542b6f@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) > Last Maintainer: Ronald van Haren > sqlite2 > Depends: readline > Required by: gambas2,python-pysqlite-legacy > okay, took it back as I need it for freevo through python-pysqlite-legacy Ronald From atsutane at freethoughts.de Fri Feb 5 08:13:01 2010 From: atsutane at freethoughts.de (Thorsten =?ISO-8859-1?B?VPZwcGVy?=) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:13:01 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <20100205141301.212d8e02@hell> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224 On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:03:49 -0600 "Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)" wrote: > teagtk > Depends: curl,enchant,gtksourceview2 > Required by: none Adopted, will go through the whole list later. - -- Jabber: atsutane at freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iFYEARELAAYFAktsGV0ACgkQOeTxfyla+/SkQADgu97N7UD4do9Lv7tg7D3cG+DD /7POK3taYoos2gDfTZHEUspc26+ep4jbUd7uNlQjD+gp59wEvGgT4w== =DAp5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From pressh at gmail.com Fri Feb 5 08:13:45 2010 From: pressh at gmail.com (Ronald van Haren) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:13:45 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request In-Reply-To: <3ef1684e1002041112v229237f0rdead75e0e65934c7@mail.gmail.com> References: <3ef1684e1002040615h5b0df61fq4fa8bc16195d232a@mail.gmail.com> <291cdeab1002040624k3ac8ec5dgbc82d3ca51792da5@mail.gmail.com> <3ef1684e1002041112v229237f0rdead75e0e65934c7@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <9fcf70361002050513t1a29483aj6d651b122fbd65aa@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Massimiliano Torromeo wrote: > Ok, no problem, but it is outdated now and I have little interest in > updating it. > Guess I'll abandon it so that it can be adopted by someone that is > interested in keeping it updated. > > Regards. > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: >> Wait til it gets to extra. Currently it's an orphan. >> >> On 04/02/2010, Massimiliano Torromeo wrote: >>> Hi, >>> please delete my aur package virtuoso-opensource since it is in >>> testing and will be officially supported by arch. >>> >>> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24036 >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >> >> >> -- >> GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD >> > well it shouldn' matter too much that it is outdated. People who want the newest version use [testing] either way and it will move in ~1 week to [extra] if I'm not mistaken. Ronald From razielmine at gmail.com Fri Feb 5 09:23:26 2010 From: razielmine at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ismael_Barros=C2=B2?=) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:23:26 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request Message-ID: <82e274891002050623x67a2c6afs96e91a76a205e4cc@mail.gmail.com> Hi, Please, remove this package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33846 It's a duplicate of this package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24727 I duplicated it by mistake, I forgot to change the package name when I forked xf86-input-synaptics package. Regards, Ismael From angvp at archlinux.com.ve Fri Feb 5 09:26:18 2010 From: angvp at archlinux.com.ve (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Angel_Vel=E1squez?=) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:26:18 -0300 Subject: [aur-general] [exim] Bump to 4.71 Message-ID: <330e48781002050626y619c07fcq7809de5c8f1b175c@mail.gmail.com> Hi, Yesterday Andrea (BaSh) moved to [community] exim, when I arrived home I got the bug notifications which the package had when it was on [extra]; but Daniel (Ghost1227) closes those bug too fast :O (I already said thank to him), now that those bugs are closed, I packaged a new release and it's on [community-testing] I would like some feedback from exim's user, so if the package it's ready I will move it from [community-testing] to [community]. Opinions? -- Angel Vel?squez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com From angvp at archlinux.com.ve Fri Feb 5 09:27:03 2010 From: angvp at archlinux.com.ve (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Angel_Vel=E1squez?=) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:27:03 -0300 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request In-Reply-To: <82e274891002050623x67a2c6afs96e91a76a205e4cc@mail.gmail.com> References: <82e274891002050623x67a2c6afs96e91a76a205e4cc@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <330e48781002050627n6cbdf189sbaaf88643230a7d@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Ismael Barros? wrote: > Hi, > > Please, remove this package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33846 > It's a duplicate of this package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24727 > > I duplicated it by mistake, I forgot to change the package name when I > forked xf86-input-synaptics package. > > Regards, > Ismael > Removed by some tu very fast! -- Angel Vel?squez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com From pressh at gmail.com Fri Feb 5 09:27:08 2010 From: pressh at gmail.com (Ronald van Haren) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:27:08 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request In-Reply-To: <82e274891002050623x67a2c6afs96e91a76a205e4cc@mail.gmail.com> References: <82e274891002050623x67a2c6afs96e91a76a205e4cc@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <9fcf70361002050627o6579b45dlebfe49216e66edeb@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Ismael Barros? wrote: > Hi, > > Please, remove this package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33846 > It's a duplicate of this package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24727 > > I duplicated it by mistake, I forgot to change the package name when I > forked xf86-input-synaptics package. > > Regards, > Ismael > done. what for functionality does the patch add? why not using a name following the xf86-input naming scheme? Ronald From andrew.antle at gmail.com Fri Feb 5 12:58:28 2010 From: andrew.antle at gmail.com (Andrew Antle) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 12:58:28 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Adoption of python-markdown Message-ID: I've adopted python-markdown in [unsupported]. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10797 -- Andrew Antle From stefan-husmann at t-online.de Fri Feb 5 13:26:53 2010 From: stefan-husmann at t-online.de (Stefan Husmann) Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:26:53 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Adoption of python-markdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B6C62ED.5060107@t-online.de> Am 05.02.2010 18:58, schrieb Andrew Antle: > I've adopted python-markdown in [unsupported]. > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10797 Hello, good to know that it is maintained, but orphaned packages may be taken by anyone without asking or telling. Keep on contributing! Regards Stefan From robsonpeixoto at gmail.com Fri Feb 5 13:30:55 2010 From: robsonpeixoto at gmail.com (Robson Peixoto) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:30:55 -0200 Subject: [aur-general] [exim] Bump to 4.71 In-Reply-To: <330e48781002050626y619c07fcq7809de5c8f1b175c@mail.gmail.com> References: <330e48781002050626y619c07fcq7809de5c8f1b175c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1564af2a1002051030g791a9a9ayc0c07353ffef088e@mail.gmail.com> 2010/2/5 Angel Vel?squez > Hi, > > Yesterday Andrea (BaSh) moved to [community] exim, when I arrived home > I got the bug notifications which the package had when it was on > [extra]; but Daniel (Ghost1227) closes those bug too fast :O (I > already said thank to him), now that those bugs are closed, I packaged > a new release and it's on [community-testing] I would like some > feedback from exim's user, so if the package it's ready I will move it > from [community-testing] to [community]. > > Opinions? > On my x86_64, I am using a gmail relay and are working well. =) > > -- > Angel Vel?squez > angvp @ irc.freenode.net > Arch Linux Trusted User > Linux Counter: #359909 > http://www.angvp.com > -- Robson Roberto Souza Peixoto Robinho robsonpeixoto at gmail.com Telefone: (19) 8821-0396 (oi) (19) 9799-0135 (vivo) Computer Science Master's degree student, University of Campinas Linux Counter #395633 IRC: robsonpeixoto http://twitter.com/robsonpeixoto From andrew.antle at gmail.com Fri Feb 5 13:32:36 2010 From: andrew.antle at gmail.com (Andrew Antle) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 13:32:36 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Adoption of python-markdown In-Reply-To: <4B6C62ED.5060107@t-online.de> References: <4B6C62ED.5060107@t-online.de> Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote: > Hello, > > good to know that it is maintained, but orphaned packages may be > taken by anyone without asking or telling. > > Keep on contributing! > > Regards Stefan Thanks for letting me know, Stefan. Cheers, Andrew From stefan-husmann at t-online.de Fri Feb 5 14:48:00 2010 From: stefan-husmann at t-online.de (Stefan Husmann) Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:48:00 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <4B6C75F0.1010402@t-online.de> luaAm 05.02.2010 09:03, schrieb Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227): > The following is a complete list of all current orphans in [community]. > All packages are organized by last known maintainer. If a maintainer is > not listed or that maintainer is no longer a TU/Dev, it is categorized > as no maintainer at the end of the list. Please read through the list > and re-adopt any packages you are still willing to maintain. > > > Last Maintainer: Alexander Fehr > mget > Depends: ruby,wget > Required by: none > > Last Maintainer: Allan McRae > barrage > Depends: sdl_mixer > Required by: none > flickrnet > Depends: mono > Required by: none > gnome-keyring-sharp-svn > Depends: ndesk-dbus > Required by: gnome-do > notify-sharp-svn > Depends: gtk-sharp-2,ndesk-dbus-glib > Required by: gnome-do > > Last Maintainer: Andrea Scarpino > interlis-compiler > Depends: java-runtime > Required by: umleditor > mercury > Depends: java-runtime,libxss,libxt > Required by: none > python-openbabel > Depends: python,openbabel > Required by: none > ruby-rcairo > Depends: cairo,ruby > Required by: ruby-gtk2 > tmsnc > Depends: ncurses,openssl > Required by: none > > Last Maintainer: Angel 'angvp' Velasquez > obby > Depends: avahi,net6 > Required by: gobby > > Last Maintainer: Corrado Primier > libcuefile > Depends: glibc > Required by: musepack-tools > libreplaygain > Depends: glibc > Required by: musepack-tools > musepack-tools > Depends: libcuefile,libreplaygain > Required by: none > > Last Maintainer: dibblethewrecker dibblethewrecker.at.jiwe.dot.org > dgpsip > Depends: glibc > Required by: none > gdal (out of date) > Depends: > geos,libgeotiff,libjpeg,libpng,libtiff,mysql,netcdf,postgresql,python,python-numpy,sqlite3 > > Required by: gdal-grass,grass,thuban,thuban-svn > gdal-grass > Depends: gdal,grass > Required by: none > gen2shp > Depends: shapelib > Required by: none > geos (out of date) > Depends: gcc-libs > Required by: gdal,postgis > gkrellmpc > Depends: curl,gkrellm > Required by: none > gpsmanshp > Depends: bash,shapelib,tcl > Required by: none > gquilt > Depends: pygtk,quilt > Required by: none > grass (out of date) > Depends: > gdal,libjpeg,libpng,libtiff,mesa,proj,python,sqlite3,swig,tk,xorg-server > Required by: gdal-grass,qgis > hacburn > Depends: > cddb_get,cdrtools,glib-perl,gtk2,gtk2-perl,lame,mpg321,perl,vorbis-tools,xorg-server > > Required by: none > libscigraphica > Depends: gtk2+extra,libxml2,perlxml,python-numarray > Required by: scigraphica > lrmi > Depends: glibc > Required by: none > magickthumbnail > Depends: rox,rox-lib > Required by: none > mime-editor > Depends: pygtk,python,rox-lib,shared-mime-info > Required by: none > miscsplashutils > Depends: freetype2 > Required by: none > opendx > Depends: imagemagick,lesstif,netcdf > Required by: none > qgis (out of date) > Depends: curl,giflib,grass,gsl,jasper,pyqt,python,qt,xerces-c > Required by: none > scigraphica > Depends: imlib,libscigraphica,libxml2,perl-xml-simple > Required by: none > shp2svg > Depends: perl-math-round,postgis > Required by: none > tclgeomap > Depends: glibc,tcl > Required by: tkgeomap,tkgm_util > thuban > Depends: gdal,python-pysqlite-legacy,wxgtk,wxpython > Required by: none > thuban-svn > Depends: gdal,python-pysqlite-legacy,wxgtk,wxpython > Required by: none > tkgeomap > Depends: tclgeomap,tk > Required by: tkgm_util > tkgm_util > Depends: tclgeomap,tkgeomap > Required by: none > videothumbnail > Depends: rox,rox-lib,mplayer > Required by: none > > Last Maintainer: Douglas Soares de Andrade > aqua-data-studio (out of date) > Depends: j2re > Required by: none > atk-docs > Depends: none > Required by: none > cvs-feature > Depends: glibc,heimdal > Required by: none > epydoc > Depends: python > Required by: none > flamerobin > Depends: libfbclient,wxgtk > Required by: none > gazpacho > Depends: kiwi > Required by: none > grub-gfx > Depends: ncurses > Required by: none > kiwi > Depends: pygtk > Required by: flumotion,gazpacho,pida > kpogre > Depends: kdelibs3,libpqxx > Required by: none > man-pages-pt_br > Depends: man-pages > Required by: none > mysql-ruby > Depends: libmysqlclient,ruby > Required by: none > psqlodbc > Depends: unixodbc > Required by: none > psyco > Depends: glibc,python > Required by: none > pygoocanvas > Depends: goocanvas,pygtk,python > Required by: pitivi > python What is this? python is in extra! > Depends: db,python > Required by: none > python-clientform > Depends: python > Required by: python-mechanize > python-constraint > Depends: python > Required by: none > python-mechanize > Depends: python-clientform > Required by: none > python-numarray > Depends: python > Required by: libscigraphica > python-pyparallel > Depends: python > Required by: none > python-pyro > Depends: python > Required by: none > python-pyserial > Depends: python > Required by: none > > Last Maintainer: Eric Belanger > cube > Depends: enet,libgl,mesa,sdl_image,sdl_mixer > Required by: none > > Last Maintainer: Geoffroy Carrier > cgmail > Depends: dbus-python,gnome-python-desktop,notification-daemon,python > Required by; none > comgt > Depends: hsolink,pygtk > Required by: none > firehol > Depends: gawk,iproute,iptables > Required by: none > gimp-mathmap (out of date) > Depends: giflib,gimp,gsl,gtksourceview > Required by: none > mitter > Depends: pygtk,python > Required by: none > noyau > Depends: bash > Required by: none > ozerocdoff > Depends: none > Required by: hsoconnect,hsolink > protege (out of date) > Depends: java-runtime > Required by: none > python-memcached > Depends: python > Required by: none > r8101 > Depends: none > Required by: none > rezero > Depends: none > Required by: none > ruby-sqlite3 > Depends: ruby,sqlite3 > Required by: none > slimevolley > Depends: sdl_image,sdl_net,sdl_ttf > Required by: none > tango-generator > Depends: > dbus-python,imagemagick,librsvg,pygtk,pyxdg,shared-mime-info,xdg-utils > Required by: none > texlive-dot2texi > Depends: dot2tex,texlive-core,texlive-latexextra,texlive-pstricks > Required by: none > ucl > Depends: none > Required by: none > urlgrabber > Depends: python > Required by: none > xtmsplit > Depends: gcc-libs > Required by: none > zisofs-tools > Depends: cdrkit > Required by: none > > Last Maintainer: Giovanni Scafora > omniorb > Depends: gcc-libs,openssl,python > Required by: gambas2 > toolame > Depends: glibc > Required by: dvd-slideshow > > Last Maintainer: Hugo Doria > aspell-pt_br > Depends: aspell > Required by: none > gtk-candido-engine > Depends: gtk2 > Required by: none > openlh-client > Depends: > dbus-glib,dbus-python,gnome-panel,gnome-python,openlh-core,openlh-server,pygtk,xdg-utils > > Required by: none > openlh-core > Depends: python,python-gnutls > Required by: openlh-client,openlh-server > openlh-server > Depends: gnome-python,openlh-core,pygtk,python-sqlalchemy,xdg-utils > Required by: openlh-client > python-certtool > Depends: gnutls,python > Required by: none > > Last Maintainer: Jan de Groot > libgdamm > Depends: libgda,glibmm > Required by: glom > > Last Maintainer: Jaroslaw Swierczynski > libcgi > Depends: glibc > Required by: none > linuxtv-dvb-apps > Depends: glibc > Required by: none > multimux > Depends: none > Required by: any2dvd > nepim > Depends: liboop > Required by: none > sauerbraten > Depends: > desktop-file-utils,hicolor-icon-theme,libgl,mesa,sdl_image,sdl_mixer > Required by: none > stegdetect > Depends: glibc > Required by: none > > Last Maintainer: Jeff Mickey > castget > Depends: curl,glib2,id3lib,libxml2 > Required by: none > cjc > Depends: python-pyxmpp > Required by: none > cppunit > Depends: none > Required by: none > ctemplate > Depends: gcc-libs > Required by: none > cxxtest > Depends: gcc,perl > Required by: none > fdm > Depends: openssl,tdb,zlib > Required by: none > icomplete > Depends: ctags,vim > Required by: none > ipcheck > Depends: python > Required by: none > live-f1 > Depends: heimdal,neon > Required by: none > lomoco > Depends: libusb > Required by: none > raggle > Depends: ruby,ruby-ncurses > Required by: none > ruby-ncurses > Depends: ruby > Required by: raggle > speedometer > Depends: python-urwid > Required by: none > tdl > Depends: ncurses > Required by: none > vsound > Depends: sox > Required by: none > > Last Maintainer: Mateusz Herych > libmirage > Depends: glib2,libsndfile > Required by: cdemu-daemon > vhba-module > Depends: kernel26 > Required by: cdemu-daemon > > Last Maintainer: Roman Kyrylych > aspell-uk > Depends: aspell > Required by: none > bakery > Depends: gconfmm,gnome-vfsmm,gtkmm,libglademm,libxml++ > Required by: none > colorer > Depends: gcc > Required by: mc-colorer > esekeyd > Depends: glibc > Required by: none > glom (out of date) > Depends: > gconfmm,gnome-python-extras,goocanvasmm,iso-codes,libepc,libgdamm,libgtksourceviewmm2,libxml++,postgresql,pygtk > > Required by: none > iniparser > Depends: glibc > Required by: none > libgtksourceviewmm2 > Depends: gtkmm,gtksourceview2 > Required by: glom,gobby > libxnvctrl > Depends: none > Required by: none > mc-colorer > Depends: colorer,e2fsprogs,glib2,gpm > Required by: none > network-ups-tools > Depends: hal,openssl > Required by: none > pessulus > Depends: gconf,gnome-python > Required by: none > superswitcher > Depends: gconf,libwnck,dbus-glib > Required by: none > webfs > Depends: openssl > Required by: none > wzdftpd > Depends: avahi,gnutls,pam,tcl > Required by: none > > Last Maintainer: Sergej Pupykin > eclipse-epic > Depends: eclipse,perl > Required by: none > gtypist > Depends: ncurses,perl > Required by: none > lockdev > Depends: none > Required by: schroot > mpdcon > Depends: gnustep-back > Required by: none > mt-daapd > Depends: avahi,gdbm,libid3tag > Required by: none > nas > Depends: libxaw > Required by: none > ncpfs > Depends: none > Required by: none > postfix-policyd-spf-perl > Depends: perl-mail-spf,perl-netaddr-ip > Required by: none > python-lcms > Depends: lcms,libtiff,python > Required by: sk1 > siefs > Depends: fuse > Required by: none > torcs-data > Depends: none > Required by: none > uswsusp > Depends: libgcrypt,libx86,lzo2 > Required by: none > wml > Depends: perl,libpng,gdbm,db,ncurses > Required by: none > > Last Maintainer: Stefan Husmann > diacanvas > Depends: gnome-python,libgnomecanvas,libgnomeprint > Required by: gnuconcept > partlibrary > Depends: bash > Required by: none > ruby-atk > Depends: atk,ruby,ruby-glib2 > Required by: ruby-gtk2 > ruby-gconf2 > Depends: gconf,ruby-glib2 > Required by: none > ruby-gdkpixbuf2 > Depends: gtk2,ruby-glib2 > Required by: ruby-gtk2 > ruby-gettext > Depends: gettext,ruby-locale > Required by: none > ruby-glib2 > Depends: glib2,ruby > Required by: ruby-atk,ruby-gconf2,ruby-gdkpixbuf2,ruby-gtk2,ruby-pango > ruby-gnomecanvas > Depends: libgnomecanvas,ruby-gtk2,ruby-libart > Required by: ruby-gnome2 > ruby-gtk2 > Depends: ruby-atk,ruby-gdkpixbuf2,ruby-glib2,ruby-pango,ruby-rcairo > Required by: ruby-gnomecanvas,ruby-libglade > ruby-hpricot > Depends: ruby > Required by: none > ruby-libglade > Depends: libglade,ruby-gtk2 > Required by: none > ruby-locale > Depends: ruby > Required by: ruby-gettext > ruby-pango > Depends: pango,ruby-glib2 > Required by: ruby-gtk2 > vamps > Depends: libdvdread > Required by: none > > Last Maintainer: Thayer Williams > bbpager > Depends: gcc-libs,glibc,libsm,libx11,libxft > Required by: none > lal > Depends: libxft > Required by: none > > Last Maintainer: Vesa Kaihlavirta > pantomime > Depends: gnustep-back,openssl > Required by: gnumail > schismtracker > Depends: sdl,gcc > Required by: none > > Last Maintainer: None > abyssws > Depends: glibc > Required by: none > adns > Depends: glibc > Required by: adns-python,gnunet,gnunet-gtk,liboop > arpack > Depends: glibc > Required by: freemat > assaultcube > Depends: mesa,openal,sdl_image,sdl_mixer > Required by: none > autocutsel > Depends: libxaw > Required by: none > chuck > Depends: gcc-libs,libsndfile > Required by: none > dumb > Depends: allegro,glibc > Required by: none > exim > Depends: db,openssl,pam,pcre,tcp_wrappers > Required by: none > gufw (out of date) > Depends: gksu,gnome-python,pygtk,sudo,ufw > Required by: none > hal-cups-utils > Depends: dbus,glib2,hal,system-config-printer > Required by: none > jump-project > Depends: java-xerces2,junit > Required by: jump-roadmatcher > jump-roadmatcher > Depends: jump-project > Required by: none > keyboardcast > Depends: libglade,libwnck,libxmu > Required by: none > libatomic_ops > Depends: none > Required by: none > libfakekey > Depends: libxtst > Required by: matchbox-keyboard > libgtksourceviewmm > Depends: gtkmm,gtksourceview > Required by: none > liboop > Depends: adns,glib,glib2,readline > Required by: nepim > libupnp > Depends: glibc > Required by: ushare > libzdb > Depends: libmysqlclient,postgresql-libs,sqlite3 > Required by: none > mezogis > Depends: postgis,pygtk,python-geotypes > Required by: none > metakit > Depends: gcc-libs > Required by: gourmet > mpgtx > Depends: none > Required by: any2dvd > net6 > Depends: gnutls,libsigc++2.0 > Required by: obby > nextaw > Depends: libxmu > Required by: none > plan9port (out of date) > Depends: x-server > Required by: none > polymer > Depends: qt3 > Required by: none > pork > Depends: ncurses,perl > Required by: none > python-geotypes > Depends: python-psycopg1 > Required by: mezogis > python-psycopg1 > Depends: postgresql,python-egenix-mx-base > Required by: python-geotypes > rox-lib > Depends: pygtk,python > Required by: magickthumbnail,mime-editor,videothumbnail > ruby-gnome2 > Depends: libgnomeui,ruby-gnomecanvas > Required by: none > ruby-libart > Depends: libart-lgpl,libjpeg,libpng,ruby > Required by: ruby-gnomecanvas > ruby-mpd > Depends: ruby > Required by: none > shapelib > Depends: glibc > Required by: gen2shp,gpsmanshp > trickle > Depends: libevent > Required by: none > ufw > Depends: iptables,python > Required by: gufw > webboard > Depends: gnome-panel,gnome-python > Required by: none > wmname > Depends: libx11 > Required by: none > Adopted: kakasi jgoodies-looks python-pyx python-pypdf bbdb I also tried to build libscigraphica and scigraphica, but they do not build. Regards Stefan From ghost1227 at archlinux.us Fri Feb 5 15:34:20 2010 From: ghost1227 at archlinux.us (Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:34:20 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <4B6C75F0.1010402@t-online.de> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> <4B6C75F0.1010402@t-online.de> Message-ID: <8a2b1b591002051234q6355d7d7k4708bd7d4658fc68@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote: > luaAm 05.02.2010 09:03, schrieb Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227): >> >> The following is a complete list of all current orphans in [community]. >> All packages are organized by last known maintainer. If a maintainer is >> not listed or that maintainer is no longer a TU/Dev, it is categorized >> as no maintainer at the end of the list. Please read through the list >> and re-adopt any packages you are still willing to maintain. >> >> >> python ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?What is this? python is in extra! should have been python-. When the list clears out a bit we'll see what i mistyped :P > > Adopted: > kakasi > jgoodies-looks > python-pyx > python-pypdf Thanks! > bbdb Huh? > I also tried to build libscigraphica and ?scigraphica, but they do not > build. Is that a vote to remove them from [community]? Thanks to all who have helped clean up [community] so far! From snowmaniscool at gmail.com Fri Feb 5 16:33:49 2010 From: snowmaniscool at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9langer?=) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:33:49 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] [arch-notifications] Integrity Check i686: core, extra, community 05-02-2010 In-Reply-To: <20100205210052.C07869200C@archlinux.org> References: <20100205210052.C07869200C@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <7fcd249b1002051333k35b4b123wfd69db23fdfb6e19@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:00 PM, wrote: > > ================================================ > = Integrity Check i686 of core,extra,community = > ================================================ > > Duplicate PKGBUILDs > --------------------- > /srv/abs/rsync/i686/extra/abiword-plugins vs. /srv/abs/rsync/i686/extra/abiword > /srv/abs/rsync/i686/extra/xmlrpc-c vs. /srv/abs/rsync/i686/community/xmlrpc-c > What's the deal with xmlrpc-c ? It seems that it was moved from extra to community repo. Is that correct? But the package is still in the extra db. It's in the community svn but the package isn't in the community repo yet. Did someone forgot to run db-community? From snowmaniscool at gmail.com Fri Feb 5 17:46:52 2010 From: snowmaniscool at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9langer?=) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:46:52 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <7fcd249b1002051446o6f50ff7dw2e202cd6004fe807@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) wrote: > The following is a complete list of all current orphans in [community]. All > packages are organized by last known maintainer. If a maintainer is not > listed or that maintainer is no longer a TU/Dev, it is categorized as no > maintainer at the end of the list. Please read through the list and re-adopt > any packages you are still willing to maintain. > > > > Last Maintainer: Eric Belanger > ? ?cube > ? ? ? ?Depends: enet,libgl,mesa,sdl_image,sdl_mixer > ? ? ? ?Required by: none > Not interested in it anymore. BTW, I believe it is now superceeded by sauerbraten and/or assaultcube which are also on this list. So in fact, cube might be a candidate for removal. If no one wants sauerbraten and/or assaultcube, they might be a good fit in the arch-games repo. From ghost1227 at archlinux.us Fri Feb 5 18:13:58 2010 From: ghost1227 at archlinux.us (Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:13:58 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <7fcd249b1002051446o6f50ff7dw2e202cd6004fe807@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> <7fcd249b1002051446o6f50ff7dw2e202cd6004fe807@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <8a2b1b591002051513p22018455nc7c578293f92c73d@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Eric B?langer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) > wrote: >> The following is a complete list of all current orphans in [community]. All >> packages are organized by last known maintainer. If a maintainer is not >> listed or that maintainer is no longer a TU/Dev, it is categorized as no >> maintainer at the end of the list. Please read through the list and re-adopt >> any packages you are still willing to maintain. >> >> > >> >> Last Maintainer: Eric Belanger >> ? ?cube >> ? ? ? ?Depends: enet,libgl,mesa,sdl_image,sdl_mixer >> ? ? ? ?Required by: none >> > > Not interested in it anymore. BTW, I believe it is now superceeded by > sauerbraten and/or assaultcube which are also on this list. ?So in > fact, cube might be a candidate for removal. ?If no one wants > sauerbraten and/or assaultcube, they might be a good fit in the > arch-games repo. > I wholeheartedly agree... All three should be dropped to arch-games. From stefan-husmann at t-online.de Fri Feb 5 19:36:48 2010 From: stefan-husmann at t-online.de (Stefan Husmann) Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 01:36:48 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <8a2b1b591002051234q6355d7d7k4708bd7d4658fc68@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> <4B6C75F0.1010402@t-online.de> <8a2b1b591002051234q6355d7d7k4708bd7d4658fc68@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B6CB9A0.4030802@t-online.de> Am 05.02.2010 21:34, schrieb Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227): > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Stefan Husmann > wrote: >> luaAm 05.02.2010 09:03, schrieb Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227): >>> >>> The following is a complete list of all current orphans in [community]. >>> All packages are organized by last known maintainer. If a maintainer is >>> not listed or that maintainer is no longer a TU/Dev, it is categorized >>> as no maintainer at the end of the list. Please read through the list >>> and re-adopt any packages you are still willing to maintain. >>> >>> >>> python What is this? python is in extra! > > should have been python-. When the list clears out a bit > we'll see what i mistyped :P Mistyping is allowed :) When I search a text in thunderbird, I often have the emacs shortcut Ctrl-s in my fingers, but in thunderbird it is CTRL-f. The "luaAm" above comes from that. >> >> Adopted: >> kakasi >> jgoodies-looks >> python-pyx >> python-pypdf > > Thanks! Thank you for your big efforts to clean up community! >> bbdb > > Huh? I like emacs, so maybe I will like that, too. >> I also tried to build libscigraphica and scigraphica, but they do not >> build. > > Is that a vote to remove them from [community]? > Yes > Thanks to all who have helped clean up [community] so far! > Thank you again. Regards Stefan From xyne at archlinux.ca Fri Feb 5 21:26:20 2010 From: xyne at archlinux.ca (Xyne) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 03:26:20 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <8a2b1b591002051513p22018455nc7c578293f92c73d@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> <7fcd249b1002051446o6f50ff7dw2e202cd6004fe807@mail.gmail.com> <8a2b1b591002051513p22018455nc7c578293f92c73d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100206032620.615adb32@archlinux.ca> > I wholeheartedly agree... All three should be dropped to arch-games. If arch-games were more prominent then I would agree, and add Nexuiz to the list. Maybe arch-games could be included in the default pacman.conf file, commented out near the bottom, thus making it a semi-official repo. Thoughts? From louipc.ist at gmail.com Fri Feb 5 21:56:30 2010 From: louipc.ist at gmail.com (Loui Chang) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 21:56:30 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <20100206032620.615adb32@archlinux.ca> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> <7fcd249b1002051446o6f50ff7dw2e202cd6004fe807@mail.gmail.com> <8a2b1b591002051513p22018455nc7c578293f92c73d@mail.gmail.com> <20100206032620.615adb32@archlinux.ca> Message-ID: <20100206025630.GL3771@lynn> On Sat 06 Feb 2010 03:26 +0100, Xyne wrote: > > I wholeheartedly agree... All three should be dropped to arch-games. > If arch-games were more prominent then I would agree, and add Nexuiz to > the list. Maybe arch-games could be included in the default pacman.conf > file, commented out near the bottom, thus making it a semi-official > repo. You can help make it more prominent by maintaining your games there! I don't think it needs to be official, or even semi-official to be trusted, or usable. Hey look at kdemod. From daenyth+arch at gmail.com Fri Feb 5 22:23:42 2010 From: daenyth+arch at gmail.com (Daenyth Blank) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 22:23:42 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <20100206025630.GL3771@lynn> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> <7fcd249b1002051446o6f50ff7dw2e202cd6004fe807@mail.gmail.com> <8a2b1b591002051513p22018455nc7c578293f92c73d@mail.gmail.com> <20100206032620.615adb32@archlinux.ca> <20100206025630.GL3771@lynn> Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 21:56, Loui Chang wrote: > You can help make it more prominent by maintaining your games there! > I don't think it needs to be official, or even semi-official to be > trusted, or usable. Hey look at kdemod. > > Agreed. Also if anyone is interested in maintaining stuff there, talk to Stythys or myself :) From lists at baums-on-web.de Fri Feb 5 22:34:21 2010 From: lists at baums-on-web.de (Heiko Baums) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 04:34:21 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Package removal request: libjpeg-static In-Reply-To: <20100116145817.3cfd825d@darkstar.galaxy.all> References: <4B513EE9.5090801@archlinux.org> <4B515DCC.9040006@archlinux.us> <4B515F3D.4070207@archlinux.org> <20100116145817.3cfd825d@darkstar.galaxy.all> Message-ID: <20100206043421.27c4e097@darkstar.galaxy.all> Hi, now that libjpeg 8-2 from [extra] has the static version included again, my AUR package libjpeg-static is no longer needed. It was just an interim solution to be able to compile fbsplash. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34273 Greetings, Heiko From foutrelis at gmail.com Fri Feb 5 22:42:11 2010 From: foutrelis at gmail.com (Evangelos Foutras) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 05:42:11 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Package removal request: libjpeg-static In-Reply-To: <20100206043421.27c4e097@darkstar.galaxy.all> References: <4B513EE9.5090801@archlinux.org> <4B515DCC.9040006@archlinux.us> <4B515F3D.4070207@archlinux.org> <20100116145817.3cfd825d@darkstar.galaxy.all> <20100206043421.27c4e097@darkstar.galaxy.all> Message-ID: On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Heiko Baums wrote: > Hi, > > now that libjpeg 8-2 from [extra] has the static version included > again, my AUR package libjpeg-static is no longer needed. It was just > an interim solution to be able to compile fbsplash. > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34273 > > Greetings, > Heiko Removed. From lists at baums-on-web.de Fri Feb 5 22:43:24 2010 From: lists at baums-on-web.de (Heiko Baums) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 04:43:24 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Package removal request: libjpeg-static In-Reply-To: References: <4B513EE9.5090801@archlinux.org> <4B515DCC.9040006@archlinux.us> <4B515F3D.4070207@archlinux.org> <20100116145817.3cfd825d@darkstar.galaxy.all> <20100206043421.27c4e097@darkstar.galaxy.all> Message-ID: <20100206044324.35692d2c@darkstar.galaxy.all> Am Sat, 6 Feb 2010 05:42:11 +0200 schrieb Evangelos Foutras : > On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Heiko Baums > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > now that libjpeg 8-2 from [extra] has the static version included > > again, my AUR package libjpeg-static is no longer needed. It was > > just an interim solution to be able to compile fbsplash. > > > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34273 > > > > Greetings, > > Heiko > > Removed. Thanks. From xyne at archlinux.ca Fri Feb 5 23:46:45 2010 From: xyne at archlinux.ca (Xyne) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 05:46:45 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> <7fcd249b1002051446o6f50ff7dw2e202cd6004fe807@mail.gmail.com> <8a2b1b591002051513p22018455nc7c578293f92c73d@mail.gmail.com> <20100206032620.615adb32@archlinux.ca> <20100206025630.GL3771@lynn> Message-ID: <20100206054645.678cbe5d@archlinux.ca> > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 21:56, Loui Chang wrote: > > You can help make it more prominent by maintaining your games there! > > I don't think it needs to be official, or even semi-official to be > > trusted, or usable. Hey look at kdemod. > > > > > > Agreed. > > Also if anyone is interested in maintaining stuff there, talk to > Stythys or myself :) I'm neutral. I think having popular games in [community] and thus available through pacman by default offers a good user experience. If they were in another repo several users will be left with the impression that Arch is lacking in packages, even if it's only a superficial impression. When someone previously threw a fit about large games in [community], one of the arguments for keeping them was that users expect them to be there and that that is the very point of the [community] repo... to provide packages users want. At the same time, I understand that there is only a small proportion of users who actually play games and thus the size/usage ratio is probably not justifiable. If we were to do this, PKGBUILDs and local source files should be made available for the games, preferably in a $repo.abs.tar.gz package as I've previously requested for arch-games (not sure if that went anywhere). From daenyth+arch at gmail.com Sat Feb 6 00:08:35 2010 From: daenyth+arch at gmail.com (Daenyth Blank) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 00:08:35 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <20100206054645.678cbe5d@archlinux.ca> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> <7fcd249b1002051446o6f50ff7dw2e202cd6004fe807@mail.gmail.com> <8a2b1b591002051513p22018455nc7c578293f92c73d@mail.gmail.com> <20100206032620.615adb32@archlinux.ca> <20100206025630.GL3771@lynn> <20100206054645.678cbe5d@archlinux.ca> Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 23:46, Xyne wrote: > I think having popular games in [community] and thus available through > pacman by default offers a good user experience. If they were in > another repo several users will be left with the impression that Arch > is lacking in packages, even if it's only a superficial impression. I agree that it's better to have them in community even if the perception isn't important. > When someone previously threw a fit about large games in [community], > one of the arguments for keeping them was that users expect them to be > there and that that is the very point of the [community] repo... to > provide packages users want. I'm torn on it, but I think mostly that given maintainership, community is a better place. If it's orphaned or otherwise not quite maintained, it makes more sense to move it to unsupported. Arch-Games was intended to be a supplement to community, not to replace it. It's fine to move it for maintenance issues, but I don't think there should be many reasons aside from that. > At the same time, I understand that there is only a small proportion of > users who actually play games and thus the size/usage ratio is probably > not justifiable. While understandable, I don't think it's too great to follow that concept very far. If we have official repos split by purpose, we may as well do it with other things than just games, and that could easily be ugly. > If we were to do this, PKGBUILDs and local source files should be made > available for the games, preferably in a $repo.abs.tar.gz package as > I've previously requested for arch-games (not sure if that went > anywhere). > Well the short version is that abs expects a certain svn layout which we are nowhere close to and can't copy, as devtools (or dbscripts, whichever) relies on an svn feature that I don't believe git has. We could do it in other ways, but I really find that the simple method we have now works well. It's a tradeoff - git is easier to maintain, svn is more complicated but the feature that the repos use to make the repos/ area allows a guarantee that a PKGBUILD matches the .pkg in the repo. (More or less, pkgver-pkgrel anyway). http://archlinux-gaming.org/issues/104 From calimeroteknik at free.fr Sat Feb 6 08:16:56 2010 From: calimeroteknik at free.fr (CalimeroTeknik) Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:16:56 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Staff : can you clean this AUR page's comments ? Message-ID: <4B6D6BC8.4010209@free.fr> Hello ! New to this list but not to AUR, I subscribed to ask for someone to delete some comments on one of my AUR packages : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30159 rosedubai seems to be a windows xp (bleeh) user, who apparently looks for help for wifi on windows at the wrong place. (AUR page for an ethernet driver...) I explained him that patiently by mail. Can someone delete his comments ? -- Calimero From razielmine at gmail.com Sat Feb 6 08:18:00 2010 From: razielmine at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ismael_Barros=C2=B2?=) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 14:18:00 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request In-Reply-To: <9fcf70361002050627o6579b45dlebfe49216e66edeb@mail.gmail.com> References: <82e274891002050623x67a2c6afs96e91a76a205e4cc@mail.gmail.com> <9fcf70361002050627o6579b45dlebfe49216e66edeb@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <82e274891002060518q8b8153fta41c7bcf641cf351@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Ronald van Haren wrote: > done. Thanks. > what for functionality does the patch add? It adds support to rotate the touchpad axis, so you can use it i.e. with xrandr --orientation. I fixed the description. > why not using a name following the xf86-input naming scheme? That would be nice indeed, I didn't realize when I first uploaded the package. Should I upload the a package named "xf86-input-synaptics-xrandr"? Regards, Ismael From biru.ionut at gmail.com Sat Feb 6 08:22:02 2010 From: biru.ionut at gmail.com (Ionut Biru) Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:22:02 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Staff : can you clean this AUR page's comments ? In-Reply-To: <4B6D6BC8.4010209@free.fr> References: <4B6D6BC8.4010209@free.fr> Message-ID: <4B6D6CFA.6090304@gmail.com> On 02/06/2010 03:16 PM, CalimeroTeknik wrote: > Hello ! > > New to this list but not to AUR, I subscribed to ask for someone to > delete some comments on one of my AUR packages : > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30159 > > rosedubai seems to be a windows xp (bleeh) user, who apparently looks > for help for wifi on windows at the wrong place. (AUR page for an > ethernet driver...) > I explained him that patiently by mail. > > Can someone delete his comments ? > > -- Calimero deleted and user suspended -- Ionut From andrea at archlinux.org Sat Feb 6 10:36:06 2010 From: andrea at archlinux.org (Andrea Scarpino) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 16:36:06 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] snort and zim orphans and out-of-date Message-ID: <201002061636.07923.andrea@archlinux.org> Is some DEV or TU interested in maintain snort or zim? or can I move them to AUR? zim pkgbuild must be rewrite, the upstream project uses python now. Cheers -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer From tu at dragonlord.cz Sat Feb 6 11:37:32 2010 From: tu at dragonlord.cz (Jaroslav Lichtblau) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 17:37:32 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] snort and zim orphans and out-of-date In-Reply-To: <201002061636.07923.andrea@archlinux.org> References: <201002061636.07923.andrea@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <20100206163732.GA30825@trinity.matrix> On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 04:36:06PM +0100, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > Is some DEV or TU interested in maintain snort or zim? or can I move them to > AUR? > zim pkgbuild must be rewrite, the upstream project uses python now. I can take snort, if you move it to [community]. Cheers Jaroslav -- Life only demands from you the strength you possess. Only one feat is possible -- not to have run away. -- Dag Hammarskjold From speedvin at archlinux.us Sat Feb 6 11:55:40 2010 From: speedvin at archlinux.us (member SpeedVin) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 17:55:40 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Taking package (kernel26-bfs) by TU to community. Message-ID: Hello. Is there any way to take package (kernel26-bfs) to community by someone from Trusted Users group? I will orphan it in some time becouse I don't have much time to maintrain it. Thanks for answer [image: smile] From biru.ionut at gmail.com Sat Feb 6 12:03:32 2010 From: biru.ionut at gmail.com (Ionut Biru) Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 19:03:32 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Taking package (kernel26-bfs) by TU to community. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B6DA0E4.7060804@gmail.com> On 02/06/2010 06:55 PM, member SpeedVin wrote: > Hello. > Is there any way to take package (kernel26-bfs) to community by someone from > Trusted Users group? > I will orphan it in some time becouse I don't have much time to maintrain > it. > > Thanks for answer [image: smile] personally i don't think is a good idea to maintain this in community. why should kernel26-bfs be more supported than other popular kernel patches. what about external modules, who should maintain them. -- Ionut From speedvin at archlinux.us Sat Feb 6 15:27:47 2010 From: speedvin at archlinux.us (member SpeedVin) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 21:27:47 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Taking package (kernel26-bfs) by TU to community. In-Reply-To: <4B6DA0E4.7060804@gmail.com> References: <4B6DA0E4.7060804@gmail.com> Message-ID: 2010/2/6 Ionut Biru > On 02/06/2010 06:55 PM, member SpeedVin wrote: > >> Hello. >> Is there any way to take package (kernel26-bfs) to community by someone >> from >> Trusted Users group? >> I will orphan it in some time becouse I don't have much time to maintrain >> it. >> >> Thanks for answer [image: smile] >> > > personally i don't think is a good idea to maintain this in community. why > should kernel26-bfs be more supported than other popular kernel patches. > what about external modules, who should maintain them. > > -- > Ionut > Ok first thanks for answer. I think that it will be not much more supported when it will be in community and I think it can be in community becouse it have much more votes than community requests and many archlinux peapole use it as they main kernel. What about external modules? I think that you by this understand nvidia driver right? I was thinking about this and this package can be maintrained by the same TU. Thanks. From panosfilip at gmail.com Sat Feb 6 20:14:44 2010 From: panosfilip at gmail.com (Panos Filip) Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 03:14:44 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] [Proposal] Cleaning up some Virtualbox packages on AUR Message-ID: <1f0667801002061714o26bab175y7b97a776531d22ac@mail.gmail.com> Hello to everyone :) There seem to some Virtualbox ( or virtualbox related) packages we don't really need: *1) aur/dkms-virtualbox 1.5.0-1 (Out of Date) (4) * *What is that exactly ?* *2) aur/vboxapi 3.1.2-1 (1)* SDK for VirtualBox (Personal Use Binaries Edition) *That one as well ?* *3)aur/virtualbox_bin-1 1.6.6-1 (18)* Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) *4)aur/virtualbox_bin-2 2.2.4-1 (24)* Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) *3 and 4 --> do some people really need older and unsupported (with less features or buggier) releases for Virtualbox ?* *5) aur/virtualbox_bin-3_0 3.0.12-1 (18)* Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) *What about that ? --> Like 3 and 4, but different PKGBUILD for version 3.0 and different for 3.1 ?* *6)aur/virtualbox_bin 3.1.2-2 [installed] (2101)* Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) *We do want this one, it's OK* *7)aur/virtualbox_bin_beta 3.0.0_BETA2-1 (Out of Date) (37)* Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) *OK, check this one ...hmm* *8)aur/virtualbox_bin_unstable 3.1.4_BETA2-1 (0)* Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) *We have one beta and one unstable (a.k.a beta) ? * *9)aur/virtualbox-legacy_bin 1.5.6-5 (4)* Powerful x86 virtualization - binary version (non GPL - free for personal use and evaluation) *Another one like 3 , 4 and 5 !* *10)aur/virtualbox-sun 3.1.2.56127-6 (45)* A general-purpose full virtualizer for x86 hardware (Binary Edition, Personal Use) *What's the difference with 6 ? * Regards, Panos Filip From hsa2 at difuzyon.net Sat Feb 6 23:36:47 2010 From: hsa2 at difuzyon.net (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=2EG=F6khan_SARI?=) Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 06:36:47 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] zim-nightly package in AUR Message-ID: <552ad4a51002062036r12c783b8qcff1cdfa956c477@mail.gmail.com> Hello, There is a package called zim in [extra]. I've been using it, but today i realised that zim is rewritten with python rather than perl. Then I removed old version and switched to pyzim in AUR (Because package in [extra] is not updated for a while). However, there is a package called zim-nightly* in AUR, which is -*very*- obsolete :P (It's not updated for more than a year). I think it should be deleted, shouldn't it? *: zim-nightly => http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16408 -- H.G?khan SARI hsa2 at difuzyon.net From stefan-husmann at t-online.de Sun Feb 7 04:12:27 2010 From: stefan-husmann at t-online.de (Stefan Husmann) Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:12:27 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] zim-nightly package in AUR In-Reply-To: <552ad4a51002062036r12c783b8qcff1cdfa956c477@mail.gmail.com> References: <552ad4a51002062036r12c783b8qcff1cdfa956c477@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B6E83FB.2050501@t-online.de> Am 07.02.2010 05:36, schrieb H.G?khan SARI: > Hello, > There is a package called zim in [extra]. I've been using it, but today i > realised that zim is rewritten with python rather than perl. Then I removed > old version and switched to pyzim in AUR (Because package in [extra] is not > updated for a while). However, there is a package called zim-nightly* in > AUR, which is -*very*- obsolete :P (It's not updated for more than a year). > I think it should be deleted, shouldn't it? > > *: zim-nightly => http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16408 > I agree, and there was a comment that there are no nightly revisions anymore. So it is gon now. Thanks Regards Stefan From pressh at gmail.com Sun Feb 7 04:59:35 2010 From: pressh at gmail.com (Ronald van Haren) Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 10:59:35 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request In-Reply-To: <82e274891002060518q8b8153fta41c7bcf641cf351@mail.gmail.com> References: <82e274891002050623x67a2c6afs96e91a76a205e4cc@mail.gmail.com> <9fcf70361002050627o6579b45dlebfe49216e66edeb@mail.gmail.com> <82e274891002060518q8b8153fta41c7bcf641cf351@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <9fcf70361002070159m189b541bya2ca109d40ca37de@mail.gmail.com> On Saturday, February 6, 2010, Ismael Barros? wrote: > > That would be nice indeed, I didn't realize when I first uploaded the > package. Should I upload the a package named > "xf86-input-synaptics-xrandr"? > Yes please do so Ronald From razielmine at gmail.com Sun Feb 7 05:24:41 2010 From: razielmine at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ismael_Barros=C2=B2?=) Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 11:24:41 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request In-Reply-To: <9fcf70361002070159m189b541bya2ca109d40ca37de@mail.gmail.com> References: <82e274891002050623x67a2c6afs96e91a76a205e4cc@mail.gmail.com> <9fcf70361002050627o6579b45dlebfe49216e66edeb@mail.gmail.com> <82e274891002060518q8b8153fta41c7bcf641cf351@mail.gmail.com> <9fcf70361002070159m189b541bya2ca109d40ca37de@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <82e274891002070224r7e61b503xeed5e732608370f6@mail.gmail.com> On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Ronald van Haren wrote: > On Saturday, February 6, 2010, Ismael Barros? wrote: >> >> That would be nice indeed, I didn't realize when I first uploaded the >> package. Should I upload the a package named >> "xf86-input-synaptics-xrandr"? >> > > Yes please do so Done: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34369 From cedric at gmx.ca Sun Feb 7 06:50:04 2010 From: cedric at gmx.ca (Cedric Staniewski) Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 12:50:04 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Extra/AUR duplicates In-Reply-To: <4b69e62d.a315f10a.679a.2abd@mx.google.com> References: <4A912F9C.2010703@gmx.ca> <4B69D89C.5080405@gmx.ca> <4B69DBC0.7010206@gmail.com> <4B69E310.40105@gmx.ca> <4b69e62d.a315f10a.679a.2abd@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <4B6EA8EC.70903@gmx.ca> On 03.02.2010 22:07, Chris Brannon wrote: > Cedric Staniewski wrote: > *MAJOR SNIPPAGE* >> => haskell-hashed-storage >> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/haskell-hashed-storage/ >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33987 > *SNIP* >> => haskell-quickcheck >> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/haskell-quickcheck/ >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33924 > > Some of the ones in this batch are re-uploads. I deleted them from the AUR > last month, but arch-haskell is re-uploading them. > > I sent an email to arch-haskell after the last round of Haskell removals, > but I don't know whether he got it. > > -- Chris So, what to do? But in any case, all the non-haskell duplicates can already be removed, right? From cmbrannon79 at gmail.com Sun Feb 7 09:13:43 2010 From: cmbrannon79 at gmail.com (Chris Brannon) Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 08:13:43 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] Extra/AUR duplicates In-Reply-To: <4B6EA8EC.70903@gmx.ca> References: <4A912F9C.2010703@gmx.ca> <4B69D89C.5080405@gmx.ca> <4B69DBC0.7010206@gmail.com> <4B69E310.40105@gmx.ca> <4b69e62d.a315f10a.679a.2abd@mx.google.com> <4B6EA8EC.70903@gmx.ca> Message-ID: <4b6ecb2c.9713f30a.3a89.2fad@mx.google.com> Cedric Staniewski wrote: > On 03.02.2010 22:07, Chris Brannon wrote: > > Some of the ones in this batch are re-uploads. I deleted them from the AUR > > last month, but arch-haskell is re-uploading them. > > > > I sent an email to arch-haskell after the last round of Haskell removals, > > but I don't know whether he got it. > > So, what to do? But in any case, all the non-haskell duplicates can > already be removed, right? Right. I just started working on your latest list. -- Chris From stefan-husmann at t-online.de Sun Feb 7 13:10:48 2010 From: stefan-husmann at t-online.de (Stefan Husmann) Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:10:48 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] snort and zim orphans and out-of-date In-Reply-To: <201002061636.07923.andrea@archlinux.org> References: <201002061636.07923.andrea@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <4B6F0228.8000806@t-online.de> Am 06.02.2010 16:36, schrieb Andrea Scarpino: > Is some DEV or TU interested in maintain snort or zim? or can I move them to > AUR? > zim pkgbuild must be rewrite, the upstream project uses python now. > > Cheers > Hello, reminder: if this happens, we have to delete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29334 Regards Stefan From ghost1227 at archlinux.us Sun Feb 7 13:16:08 2010 From: ghost1227 at archlinux.us (Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)) Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 12:16:08 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] snort and zim orphans and out-of-date In-Reply-To: <4B6F0228.8000806@t-online.de> References: <201002061636.07923.andrea@archlinux.org> <4B6F0228.8000806@t-online.de> Message-ID: <8a2b1b591002071016g9f2fafehef47dbaf1975fa3@mail.gmail.com> I'd be happy to take zim On 2/7/10, Stefan Husmann wrote: > Am 06.02.2010 16:36, schrieb Andrea Scarpino: >> Is some DEV or TU interested in maintain snort or zim? or can I move them >> to >> AUR? >> zim pkgbuild must be rewrite, the upstream project uses python now. >> >> Cheers >> > Hello, > > reminder: if this happens, we have to delete > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29334 > > Regards Stefan > From mrawash at gmail.com Sun Feb 7 18:01:53 2010 From: mrawash at gmail.com (M Rawash) Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:01:53 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Orphaning Request (xf86-input-wacom) Message-ID: <1265583713.17818.7.camel@localhost> please orphan "xf86-input-wacom" in AUR, for the reason cited by "illicium" in the comments section (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28999 ) i've already contacted maintainer a couple of days ago, with no response. thanks, M Rawash From ranguvar at archlinux.us Sun Feb 7 18:12:08 2010 From: ranguvar at archlinux.us (Ranguvar) Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 18:12:08 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Orphaning Request (xf86-input-wacom) In-Reply-To: <1265583713.17818.7.camel@localhost> References: <1265583713.17818.7.camel@localhost> Message-ID: <289e994d1002071512x412107fet14affb934010910f@mail.gmail.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 18:01, M Rawash wrote: > please orphan "xf86-input-wacom" in AUR, for the reason cited by > "illicium" in the comments section > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28999 ) i've already contacted > maintainer a couple of days ago, with no response. > > thanks, > M Rawash Orphaned. I can rename it also when the new maintainer asks :) -- Ranguvar [Devin Cofer] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJLb0i4AAoJEHdXKOHe3MUTUEgP/RrmsoYb41T7erbhNpxj07et nZ4AtO8HjlvhesMUptTzmBrrMB9XkccnrvEWOeAGBbz+TgI/xGwAlHrE9ft+CX3y ALkIIJCxQCuSK75Jke5xb0br5xnGywKYRJ8jVdwpgZPxek1WnBSkd40ej933+Vpt 156sTeh9FxDkcO/95gziG9KVEuCwvsnGBMWn9UdCRNpkrSI2Ot3VlwTRi9fIyItq 1r13U5sJ7kVx7ZkPKutwwp1Q7dCDmfuclY8hEnkAszxRF/STz6UWXJFoQFWrcZOu 8636GDPrbQq31K9Rvh4QO3W58k75KIRuiGzM/xvxG0p2dKXEPUcgaut0I2qwR47G gPpSLH41fJmuUEwm9JQtxIj+3c++n8zwD3w4+Na1FH+Zt76jNU6+Fmwh5l9b7FTg +gUD57ONz/fVXgBqZEAqvkRO+80Ex5x3+a2104tqMMqEMfXj3+69wTiHuv/T1Xss QSSiNhj6E+j/jLOm0mk/Xv5CPbH0aucLcwH/QhSORtncfCWJHW5RtmxN6BrVvLU3 vqgHSNWUJotAtNVtHVMB/UXcuYxZo4pT+rpYc/H/1aMpBF4aCXO6by/yWmIEcyPy Xkauf1ocIqk2pt0+vcoOsqGG0DSkXJpJYPvksIVX3z207ze0yTM1WvfgKzcZfz3T PnULFuJ2wLEFKsjt42Gw =kF0a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mrawash at gmail.com Sun Feb 7 18:11:47 2010 From: mrawash at gmail.com (M Rawash) Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:11:47 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Orphaning Request (xf86-input-wacom) In-Reply-To: <289e994d1002071512x412107fet14affb934010910f@mail.gmail.com> References: <1265583713.17818.7.camel@localhost> <289e994d1002071512x412107fet14affb934010910f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1265584307.17818.10.camel@localhost> On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 18:12 -0500, Ranguvar wrote: > On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 18:01, M Rawash wrote: > > please orphan "xf86-input-wacom" in AUR, for the reason cited by > > "illicium" in the comments section > > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28999 ) i've already contacted > > maintainer a couple of days ago, with no response. > > > > thanks, > > M Rawash > > Orphaned. > I can rename it also when the new maintainer asks :) > that was fast, thanks :) From schivmeister at gmail.com Sun Feb 7 18:17:54 2010 From: schivmeister at gmail.com (Ray Rashif) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 07:17:54 +0800 Subject: [aur-general] Orphaning Request (xf86-input-wacom) In-Reply-To: <289e994d1002071512x412107fet14affb934010910f@mail.gmail.com> References: <1265583713.17818.7.camel@localhost> <289e994d1002071512x412107fet14affb934010910f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <291cdeab1002071517j26cb1a00jf5b38480b9ce00fe@mail.gmail.com> On 8 February 2010 07:12, Ranguvar wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 18:01, M Rawash wrote: >> please orphan "xf86-input-wacom" in AUR, for the reason cited by >> "illicium" in the comments section >> (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28999 ) i've already contacted >> maintainer a couple of days ago, with no response. >> >> thanks, >> M Rawash > > Orphaned. > I can rename it also when the new maintainer asks :) I would prefer if someone adopted and ammended it to that of Xorg's fork, but only after allowing someone else to copy the original contents and upload them as linuxwacom-whatever. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD From mrawash at gmail.com Sun Feb 7 19:00:59 2010 From: mrawash at gmail.com (M Rawash) Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:00:59 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Orphaning Request (xf86-input-wacom) In-Reply-To: <291cdeab1002071517j26cb1a00jf5b38480b9ce00fe@mail.gmail.com> References: <1265583713.17818.7.camel@localhost> <289e994d1002071512x412107fet14affb934010910f@mail.gmail.com> <291cdeab1002071517j26cb1a00jf5b38480b9ce00fe@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1265587259.17818.39.camel@localhost> On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 07:17 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote: > I would prefer if someone adopted and ammended it to that of Xorg's > fork, that's what i'm doing :) > but only after allowing someone else to copy the original > contents and upload them as linuxwacom-whatever. > linuxwacom is now obsolete ("xf86-input-wacom" was started by the former developers), so i don't believe anyone still needs that patch (i also maintain the patchless version). regards, M Rawash From andrea at archlinux.org Sun Feb 7 21:06:53 2010 From: andrea at archlinux.org (Andrea Scarpino) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 03:06:53 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] snort and zim orphans and out-of-date In-Reply-To: <20100206163732.GA30825@trinity.matrix> References: <201002061636.07923.andrea@archlinux.org> <20100206163732.GA30825@trinity.matrix> Message-ID: <201002080306.54786.andrea@archlinux.org> On Saturday 06 February 2010 17:37:32 Jaroslav Lichtblau wrote: > I can take snort, if you move it to [community]. Ok, both moved to [community]. Thank you. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer From ghost1227 at archlinux.us Sun Feb 7 23:02:04 2010 From: ghost1227 at archlinux.us (Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)) Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:02:04 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <4B6C75F0.1010402@t-online.de> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> <4B6C75F0.1010402@t-online.de> Message-ID: <4B6F8CBC.1020707@archlinux.us> Updated list. Stefan, you forgot to readopt those after moving to arch=any. Last Maintainer: Alexander Fehr mget Depends: ruby,wget Required by: none Last Maintainer: Andrea Scarpino interlis-compiler Depends: java-runtime Required by: umleditor mercury Depends: java-runtime,libxss,libxt Required by: none python-openbabel Depends: python,openbabel Required by: none ruby-rcairo Depends: cairo,ruby Required by: ruby-gtk2 tmsnc Depends: ncurses,openssl Required by: none Last Maintainer: Angel 'angvp' Velasquez obby Depends: avahi,net6 Required by: gobby Last Maintainer: Corrado Primier libcuefile Depends: glibc Required by: musepack-tools libreplaygain Depends: glibc Required by: musepack-tools musepack-tools Depends: libcuefile,libreplaygain Required by: none Last Maintainer: dibblethewrecker dibblethewrecker.at.jiwe.dot.org dgpsip Depends: glibc Required by: none gdal (out of date) Depends: geos,libgeotiff,libjpeg,libpng,libtiff,mysql,netcdf,postgresql,python,python-numpy,sqlite3 Required by: gdal-grass,grass,thuban,thuban-svn gdal-grass Depends: gdal,grass Required by: none gen2shp Depends: shapelib Required by: none geos (out of date) Depends: gcc-libs Required by: gdal,postgis gkrellmpc Depends: curl,gkrellm Required by: none gpsmanshp Depends: bash,shapelib,tcl Required by: none gquilt Depends: pygtk,quilt Required by: none grass (out of date) Depends: gdal,libjpeg,libpng,libtiff,mesa,proj,python,sqlite3,swig,tk,xorg-server Required by: gdal-grass,qgis hacburn Depends: cddb_get,cdrtools,glib-perl,gtk2,gtk2-perl,lame,mpg321,perl,vorbis-tools,xorg-server Required by: none lrmi Depends: glibc Required by: none magickthumbnail Depends: rox,rox-lib Required by: none mime-editor Depends: pygtk,python,rox-lib,shared-mime-info Required by: none miscsplashutils Depends: freetype2 Required by: none opendx Depends: imagemagick,lesstif,netcdf Required by: none qgis (out of date) Depends: curl,giflib,grass,gsl,jasper,pyqt,python,qt,xerces-c Required by: none shp2svg Depends: perl-math-round,postgis Required by: none tclgeomap Depends: glibc,tcl Required by: tkgeomap,tkgm_util thuban Depends: gdal,python-pysqlite-legacy,wxgtk,wxpython Required by: none thuban-svn Depends: gdal,python-pysqlite-legacy,wxgtk,wxpython Required by: none tkgeomap Depends: tclgeomap,tk Required by: tkgm_util tkgm_util Depends: tclgeomap,tkgeomap Required by: none videothumbnail Depends: rox,rox-lib,mplayer Required by: none Last Maintainer: Douglas Soares de Andrade aqua-data-studio (out of date) Depends: j2re Required by: none atk-docs Depends: none Required by: none cvs-feature Depends: glibc,heimdal Required by: none epydoc Depends: python Required by: none flamerobin Depends: libfbclient,wxgtk Required by: none gazpacho Depends: kiwi Required by: none grub-gfx Depends: ncurses Required by: none kiwi Depends: pygtk Required by: flumotion,gazpacho,pida kpogre Depends: kdelibs3,libpqxx Required by: none man-pages-pt_br Depends: man-pages Required by: none mysql-ruby Depends: libmysqlclient,ruby Required by: none psqlodbc Depends: unixodbc Required by: none psyco Depends: glibc,python Required by: none pygoocanvas Depends: goocanvas,pygtk,python Required by: pitivi python Depends: db,python Required by: none python-clientform Depends: python Required by: python-mechanize python-constraint Depends: python Required by: none python-mechanize Depends: python-clientform Required by: none python-numarray Depends: python Required by: libscigraphica python-pyparallel Depends: python Required by: none python-pyro Depends: python Required by: none python-pyserial Depends: python Required by: none Last Maintainer: Eric Belanger cube Depends: enet,libgl,mesa,sdl_image,sdl_mixer Required by: none Last Maintainer: Geoffroy Carrier cgmail Depends: dbus-python,gnome-python-desktop,notification-daemon,python Required by; none comgt Depends: hsolink,pygtk Required by: none firehol Depends: gawk,iproute,iptables Required by: none gimp-mathmap (out of date) Depends: giflib,gimp,gsl,gtksourceview Required by: none mitter Depends: pygtk,python Required by: none noyau Depends: bash Required by: none ozerocdoff Depends: none Required by: hsoconnect,hsolink protege (out of date) Depends: java-runtime Required by: none python-memcached Depends: python Required by: none r8101 Depends: none Required by: none rezero Depends: none Required by: none ruby-sqlite3 Depends: ruby,sqlite3 Required by: none slimevolley Depends: sdl_image,sdl_net,sdl_ttf Required by: none tango-generator Depends: dbus-python,imagemagick,librsvg,pygtk,pyxdg,shared-mime-info,xdg-utils Required by: none texlive-dot2texi Depends: dot2tex,texlive-core,texlive-latexextra,texlive-pstricks Required by: none ucl Depends: none Required by: none urlgrabber Depends: python Required by: none xtmsplit Depends: gcc-libs Required by: none zisofs-tools Depends: cdrkit Required by: none Last Maintainer: Hugo Doria aspell-pt_br Depends: aspell Required by: none gtk-candido-engine Depends: gtk2 Required by: none openlh-client Depends: dbus-glib,dbus-python,gnome-panel,gnome-python,openlh-core,openlh-server,pygtk,xdg-utils Required by: none openlh-core Depends: python,python-gnutls Required by: openlh-client,openlh-server openlh-server Depends: gnome-python,openlh-core,pygtk,python-sqlalchemy,xdg-utils Required by: openlh-client python-certtool Depends: gnutls,python Required by: none Last Maintainer: Jan de Groot libgdamm Depends: libgda,glibmm Required by: glom Last Maintainer: Jaroslaw Swierczynski libcgi Depends: glibc Required by: none linuxtv-dvb-apps Depends: glibc Required by: none multimux Depends: none Required by: any2dvd nepim Depends: liboop Required by: none sauerbraten Depends: desktop-file-utils,hicolor-icon-theme,libgl,mesa,sdl_image,sdl_mixer Required by: none stegdetect Depends: glibc Required by: none Last Maintainer: Jeff Mickey castget Depends: curl,glib2,id3lib,libxml2 Required by: none cjc Depends: python-pyxmpp Required by: none cppunit Depends: none Required by: none ctemplate Depends: gcc-libs Required by: none cxxtest Depends: gcc,perl Required by: none fdm Depends: openssl,tdb,zlib Required by: none icomplete Depends: ctags,vim Required by: none ipcheck Depends: python Required by: none live-f1 Depends: heimdal,neon Required by: none lomoco Depends: libusb Required by: none raggle Depends: ruby,ruby-ncurses Required by: none ruby-ncurses Depends: ruby Required by: raggle speedometer Depends: python-urwid Required by: none tdl Depends: ncurses Required by: none vsound Depends: sox Required by: none Last Maintainer: Mateusz Herych libmirage Depends: glib2,libsndfile Required by: cdemu-daemon vhba-module Depends: kernel26 Required by: cdemu-daemon Last Maintainer: Roman Kyrylych aspell-uk Depends: aspell Required by: none bakery Depends: gconfmm,gnome-vfsmm,gtkmm,libglademm,libxml++ Required by: none colorer Depends: gcc Required by: mc-colorer esekeyd Depends: glibc Required by: none glom (out of date) Depends: gconfmm,gnome-python-extras,goocanvasmm,iso-codes,libepc,libgdamm,libgtksourceviewmm2,libxml++,postgresql,pygtk Required by: none iniparser Depends: glibc Required by: none libgtksourceviewmm2 Depends: gtkmm,gtksourceview2 Required by: glom,gobby libxnvctrl Depends: none Required by: none mc-colorer Depends: colorer,e2fsprogs,glib2,gpm Required by: none network-ups-tools Depends: hal,openssl Required by: none pessulus Depends: gconf,gnome-python Required by: none superswitcher Depends: gconf,libwnck,dbus-glib Required by: none webfs Depends: openssl Required by: none wzdftpd Depends: avahi,gnutls,pam,tcl Required by: none Last Maintainer: Sergej Pupykin eclipse-epic Depends: eclipse,perl Required by: none gtypist Depends: ncurses,perl Required by: none lockdev Depends: none Required by: schroot mpdcon Depends: gnustep-back Required by: none mt-daapd Depends: avahi,gdbm,libid3tag Required by: none nas Depends: libxaw Required by: none ncpfs Depends: none Required by: none postfix-policyd-spf-perl Depends: perl-mail-spf,perl-netaddr-ip Required by: none python-lcms Depends: lcms,libtiff,python Required by: sk1 siefs Depends: fuse Required by: none torcs-data Depends: none Required by: none uswsusp Depends: libgcrypt,libx86,lzo2 Required by: none wml Depends: perl,libpng,gdbm,db,ncurses Required by: none Last Maintainer: Stefan Husmann diacanvas Depends: gnome-python,libgnomecanvas,libgnomeprint Required by: gnuconcept partlibrary Depends: bash Required by: none ruby-atk Depends: atk,ruby,ruby-glib2 Required by: ruby-gtk2 ruby-gconf2 Depends: gconf,ruby-glib2 Required by: none ruby-gdkpixbuf2 Depends: gtk2,ruby-glib2 Required by: ruby-gtk2 ruby-gettext Depends: gettext,ruby-locale Required by: none ruby-glib2 Depends: glib2,ruby Required by: ruby-atk,ruby-gconf2,ruby-gdkpixbuf2,ruby-gtk2,ruby-pango ruby-gnomecanvas Depends: libgnomecanvas,ruby-gtk2,ruby-libart Required by: ruby-gnome2 ruby-gtk2 Depends: ruby-atk,ruby-gdkpixbuf2,ruby-glib2,ruby-pango,ruby-rcairo Required by: ruby-gnomecanvas,ruby-libglade ruby-hpricot Depends: ruby Required by: none ruby-libglade Depends: libglade,ruby-gtk2 Required by: none ruby-locale Depends: ruby Required by: ruby-gettext ruby-pango Depends: pango,ruby-glib2 Required by: ruby-gtk2 vamps Depends: libdvdread Required by: none Last Maintainer: Thayer Williams bbpager Depends: gcc-libs,glibc,libsm,libx11,libxft Required by: none lal Depends: libxft Required by: none Last Maintainer: Vesa Kaihlavirta pantomime Depends: gnustep-back,openssl Required by: gnumail schismtracker Depends: sdl,gcc Required by: none Last Maintainer: None abyssws Depends: glibc Required by: none adns Depends: glibc Required by: adns-python,gnunet,gnunet-gtk,liboop arpack Depends: glibc Required by: freemat assaultcube Depends: mesa,openal,sdl_image,sdl_mixer Required by: none autocutsel Depends: libxaw Required by: none barrage Depends: sdl_mixer Required by: none chuck Depends: gcc-libs,libsndfile Required by: none dumb Depends: allegro,glibc Required by: none exim Depends: db,openssl,pam,pcre,tcp_wrappers Required by: none flickrnet Depends: mono Required by: none gnome-keyring-sharp-svn Depends: ndesk-dbus Required by: gnome-do gufw (out of date) Depends: gksu,gnome-python,pygtk,sudo,ufw Required by: none hal-cups-utils Depends: dbus,glib2,hal,system-config-printer Required by: none jump-project Depends: java-xerces2,junit Required by: jump-roadmatcher jump-roadmatcher Depends: jump-project Required by: none keyboardcast Depends: libglade,libwnck,libxmu Required by: none libatomic_ops Depends: none Required by: none libfakekey Depends: libxtst Required by: matchbox-keyboard libgtksourceviewmm Depends: gtkmm,gtksourceview Required by: none liboop Depends: adns,glib,glib2,readline Required by: nepim libupnp Depends: glibc Required by: ushare libzdb Depends: libmysqlclient,postgresql-libs,sqlite3 Required by: none mezogis Depends: postgis,pygtk,python-geotypes Required by: none metakit Depends: gcc-libs Required by: gourmet mpgtx Depends: none Required by: any2dvd net6 Depends: gnutls,libsigc++2.0 Required by: obby nextaw Depends: libxmu Required by: none notify-sharp-svn Depends: gtk-sharp-2,ndesk-dbus-glib Required by: gnome-do omniorb Depends: gcc-libs,openssl,python Required by: gambas2 plan9port (out of date) Depends: x-server Required by: none polymer Depends: qt3 Required by: none pork Depends: ncurses,perl Required by: none python-geotypes Depends: python-psycopg1 Required by: mezogis python-psycopg1 Depends: postgresql,python-egenix-mx-base Required by: python-geotypes rox-lib Depends: pygtk,python Required by: magickthumbnail,mime-editor,videothumbnail ruby-gnome2 Depends: libgnomeui,ruby-gnomecanvas Required by: none ruby-libart Depends: libart-lgpl,libjpeg,libpng,ruby Required by: ruby-gnomecanvas ruby-mpd Depends: ruby Required by: none shapelib Depends: glibc Required by: gen2shp,gpsmanshp toolame Depends: glibc Required by: dvd-slideshow trickle Depends: libevent Required by: none ufw Depends: iptables,python Required by: gufw webboard Depends: gnome-panel,gnome-python Required by: none wmname Depends: libx11 Required by: none From hsa2 at difuzyon.net Mon Feb 8 00:15:38 2010 From: hsa2 at difuzyon.net (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=2EG=F6khan_SARI?=) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 07:15:38 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request Message-ID: <552ad4a51002072115x7ea24ee3yd17370eb3607db4c@mail.gmail.com> Hello, I've been maintaining blogpost* package but developer prefers working on a mercurial repository rather than publishing clear version updates. And there is already a package 'blogpost-hg*' in AUR, so please delete my package blogpost. * blogpost => http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18588 blogpost-hg => http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33024 -- H.G?khan SARI hsa2 at difuzyon.net From ghost1227 at archlinux.us Mon Feb 8 00:16:34 2010 From: ghost1227 at archlinux.us (Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)) Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 23:16:34 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request In-Reply-To: <552ad4a51002072115x7ea24ee3yd17370eb3607db4c@mail.gmail.com> References: <552ad4a51002072115x7ea24ee3yd17370eb3607db4c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B6F9E32.3090601@archlinux.us> On 02/07/2010 11:15 PM, H.G?khan SARI wrote: > Hello, > I've been maintaining blogpost* package but developer prefers working on a > mercurial repository rather than publishing clear version updates. And there > is already a package 'blogpost-hg*' in AUR, so please delete my package > blogpost. > > * blogpost => http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18588 > blogpost-hg => http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33024 > > Done From hsa2 at difuzyon.net Mon Feb 8 00:17:42 2010 From: hsa2 at difuzyon.net (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=2EG=F6khan_SARI?=) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 07:17:42 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request In-Reply-To: <4B6F9E32.3090601@archlinux.us> References: <552ad4a51002072115x7ea24ee3yd17370eb3607db4c@mail.gmail.com> <4B6F9E32.3090601@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <552ad4a51002072117j91e6a6u6f775a48077de2cb@mail.gmail.com> OMG, I'm impressed. I've just pushed the send button! Thanks a lot! On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) < ghost1227 at archlinux.us> wrote: > On 02/07/2010 11:15 PM, H.G?khan SARI wrote: > >> Hello, >> I've been maintaining blogpost* package but developer prefers working on a >> mercurial repository rather than publishing clear version updates. And >> there >> is already a package 'blogpost-hg*' in AUR, so please delete my package >> blogpost. >> >> * blogpost => http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18588 >> blogpost-hg => http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33024 >> >> >> > Done > -- H.G?khan SARI hsa2 at difuzyon.net From ghost1227 at archlinux.us Mon Feb 8 00:22:26 2010 From: ghost1227 at archlinux.us (Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)) Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 23:22:26 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request In-Reply-To: <552ad4a51002072117j91e6a6u6f775a48077de2cb@mail.gmail.com> References: <552ad4a51002072115x7ea24ee3yd17370eb3607db4c@mail.gmail.com> <4B6F9E32.3090601@archlinux.us> <552ad4a51002072117j91e6a6u6f775a48077de2cb@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B6F9F92.7070204@archlinux.us> On 02/07/2010 11:17 PM, H.G?khan SARI wrote: > OMG, I'm impressed. I've just pushed the send button! > > Thanks a lot! > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)< > ghost1227 at archlinux.us> wrote: > > >> On 02/07/2010 11:15 PM, H.G?khan SARI wrote: >> >> >>> Hello, >>> I've been maintaining blogpost* package but developer prefers working on a >>> mercurial repository rather than publishing clear version updates. And >>> there >>> is already a package 'blogpost-hg*' in AUR, so please delete my package >>> blogpost. >>> >>> * blogpost => http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18588 >>> blogpost-hg => http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33024 >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Done >> >> > > > That's my job! :P From farhany at xaviya.com Mon Feb 8 00:29:01 2010 From: farhany at xaviya.com (Farhan Yousaf) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 00:29:01 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Delete package: sabnzbd-0.5rc6 0.5.0RC6-1 Message-ID: Can someone delete this package please? I just created it in error. sabnzbd-0.5rc6 0.5.0RC6-1 Thanks. Farhan From ghost1227 at archlinux.us Mon Feb 8 00:32:24 2010 From: ghost1227 at archlinux.us (Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)) Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 23:32:24 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] Delete package: sabnzbd-0.5rc6 0.5.0RC6-1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B6FA1E8.2030905@archlinux.us> On 02/07/2010 11:29 PM, Farhan Yousaf wrote: > Can someone delete this package please? I just created it in error. > > sabnzbd-0.5rc6 0.5.0RC6-1 > > Thanks. > > Farhan > > Done From speedvin at archlinux.us Mon Feb 8 03:51:32 2010 From: speedvin at archlinux.us (member SpeedVin) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:51:32 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request. Message-ID: Hello. Please remove my package grub2-git becouse grub2 git repo is down for long time. Thanks. From atsutane at freethoughts.de Mon Feb 8 03:56:53 2010 From: atsutane at freethoughts.de (Thorsten =?ISO-8859-1?B?VPZwcGVy?=) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:56:53 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100208095653.45ed9fdc@hell> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224 On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:51:32 +0100 member SpeedVin wrote: > Hello. > Please remove my package grub2-git becouse grub2 git repo is down for > long time. > Thanks. Done, they now use bazaar: http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/grub-2-download.en.html Please supply a direct link to the package in future requests. - -- Jabber: atsutane at freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iFYEARELAAYFAktv0dUACgkQOeTxfyla+/SkiwDgpGkMBzyCIN5wW/B0IJvxRmMr CdSnXeSqmkucZwDeLleicH7XOJB+6WbDhVpUmvGtHthOo1Scicbm+A== =Ywzk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From lists at baums-on-web.de Mon Feb 8 04:14:53 2010 From: lists at baums-on-web.de (Heiko Baums) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:14:53 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: freetype2-static In-Reply-To: <2A1AAC65-7C63-46E4-AFA3-2A9C823FD76D@gmail.com> References: <20100102113553.2528ae62@darkstar.galaxy.all> <4B3F21A8.9030103@gmail.com> <20100102114059.6b842d44@darkstar.galaxy.all> <20100103201555.GA4107@lynn> <2A1AAC65-7C63-46E4-AFA3-2A9C823FD76D@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100208101453.4b1cb12a@darkstar.galaxy.all> Hi, I guess the package freetype2-static can be removed from AUR. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18319 It's obsolete because freetype2 has the static library included again since a long time. And freetype2-static is out-of-date and orphaned. Greetings, Heiko From schivmeister at gmail.com Mon Feb 8 04:21:18 2010 From: schivmeister at gmail.com (Ray Rashif) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:21:18 +0800 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: freetype2-static In-Reply-To: <20100208101453.4b1cb12a@darkstar.galaxy.all> References: <20100102113553.2528ae62@darkstar.galaxy.all> <4B3F21A8.9030103@gmail.com> <20100102114059.6b842d44@darkstar.galaxy.all> <20100103201555.GA4107@lynn> <2A1AAC65-7C63-46E4-AFA3-2A9C823FD76D@gmail.com> <20100208101453.4b1cb12a@darkstar.galaxy.all> Message-ID: <291cdeab1002080121q670e420blde88d0c62b75b424@mail.gmail.com> On 8 February 2010 17:14, Heiko Baums wrote: > Hi, > > I guess the package freetype2-static can be removed from AUR. > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18319 > > It's obsolete because freetype2 has the static library included again > since a long time. And freetype2-static is out-of-date and orphaned. > > Greetings, > Heiko > Thanks, done. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD From jcerdan at tecob.com Mon Feb 8 05:17:36 2010 From: jcerdan at tecob.com (Jordi Cerdan) Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:17:36 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] unicap splitted in 3 packages Message-ID: <1265624256.10104.5.camel@mercure.tecob.lan> Hi, I currently maintain unicap package in AUR. This package has been splitted in 3 new packages ( http://unicap-imaging.org/blog/ ): libunicap, libunicapgtk and libucil. I think we have 2 solutions there, but I don't know which one is more "elegant": - create 3 new packages and delete unicap - rename unicap to libunicap and create 2 new packages Which one should we choose? Kind regards. -- Jordi Cerdan http://www.jordicerdan.com Andorra -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Esta parte del mensaje est? firmada digitalmente URL: From imrehg at gmail.com Mon Feb 8 06:02:33 2010 From: imrehg at gmail.com (Gergely Imreh) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 19:02:33 +0800 Subject: [aur-general] unicap splitted in 3 packages In-Reply-To: <1265624256.10104.5.camel@mercure.tecob.lan> References: <1265624256.10104.5.camel@mercure.tecob.lan> Message-ID: <371b60071002080302k2e703cd5l4ee6e5361e62366d@mail.gmail.com> 2010/2/8 Jordi Cerdan : > Hi, > > I currently maintain unicap package in AUR. This package has been > splitted in 3 new packages ( http://unicap-imaging.org/blog/ ): > libunicap, libunicapgtk and libucil. > > I think we have 2 solutions there, but I don't know which one is more > "elegant": > > - create 3 new packages and delete unicap > - rename unicap to libunicap and create 2 new packages > > Which one should we choose? Or use the (now not very new) split package design? AUR does not support it too well, but that's just cosmetic problem. I think that's not a problem with yaourt..... Cheers, Greg From stefan-husmann at t-online.de Mon Feb 8 08:14:26 2010 From: stefan-husmann at t-online.de (Stefan Husmann) Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:14:26 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <4B6F8CBC.1020707@archlinux.us> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> <4B6C75F0.1010402@t-online.de> <4B6F8CBC.1020707@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <4B700E32.6030806@t-online.de> Am 08.02.2010 05:02, schrieb Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227): > Updated list. Stefan, you forgot to readopt those after moving to arch=any. Done. Thank you for the hint. The problem with the python-whatsoever package persists btw. Regards Stefan From vi0l093 at gmail.com Mon Feb 8 08:54:31 2010 From: vi0l093 at gmail.com (Vi0L0) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:54:31 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request for catalyst-opencl Message-ID: <201002081454.31606.vi0l093@gmail.com> Hi, plase remove this package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32968 It's not needed any more. Thanks :-) -- Greetz Vi0L0 gpg: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x561FEC2AFFC7E56E From angvp at archlinux.com.ve Mon Feb 8 09:08:12 2010 From: angvp at archlinux.com.ve (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Angel_Vel=E1squez?=) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 11:08:12 -0300 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request for catalyst-opencl In-Reply-To: <201002081454.31606.vi0l093@gmail.com> References: <201002081454.31606.vi0l093@gmail.com> Message-ID: <330e48781002080608hc5b5a56u5542c7012f0211ee@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Vi0L0 wrote: > Hi, > plase remove this package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32968 > It's not needed any more. > Thanks :-) > > -- > Greetz > Vi0L0 > gpg: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x561FEC2AFFC7E56E > Done -- Angel Vel?squez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com From tu at dragonlord.cz Mon Feb 8 13:37:41 2010 From: tu at dragonlord.cz (Jaroslav Lichtblau) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 19:37:41 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] snort and zim orphans and out-of-date In-Reply-To: <201002080306.54786.andrea@archlinux.org> References: <201002061636.07923.andrea@archlinux.org> <20100206163732.GA30825@trinity.matrix> <201002080306.54786.andrea@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <20100208183741.GA9350@trinity.matrix> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 03:06:53AM +0100, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > On Saturday 06 February 2010 17:37:32 Jaroslav Lichtblau wrote: > > I can take snort, if you move it to [community]. > Ok, both moved to [community]. snort adopted, thanks > Thank you. > > -- > Andrea `bash` Scarpino > Arch Linux Developer > Cheers Jaroslav -- a good man crossing a mountain to say "Happy New Year!" -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ted at tedpavlic.com Mon Feb 8 14:41:21 2010 From: ted at tedpavlic.com (Ted Pavlic) Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:41:21 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Bug in perl-text-bibtext build script for x86_64 platform Message-ID: <4B7068E1.4020008@tedpavlic.com> AUR -- I've sent a message to the package maintainer about this, but it has been a while since there has been an update, and so I wanted to send something here too for comment and archival purposes. At the moment, the perl-text-bibtex package fails on x86_64 systems because it tries to link libraries built without -fPIC to object files built with -fPIC. On x86_64 machines, when building the perl-text-bibtex package, it is necessary to add: -fPIC to the btparse compiler flags before running "make". That is, the PKGBUILD should... (1) Download Text::BibTeX from CPAN (2) Run "perl Makefile.PL", which will fetch a btparse distribution and untar it into a directory that it symlinks to "btparse" (3) Change to "btparse" and add "-fPIC" to CFLAGS, CPPFLAGS, and CXXFLAGS in the Makefile and src/Makefile files (4) Change back to the Text::BibTeX root and run "make" Otherwise, the linker will complain because the Perl libraries will be built with -fPIC and the btparse libraries will not be... so they'll be incompatible for linking. ALTERNATIVELY, the PKGBUILD could... (1) Download a btparse distribution and untar it into directory "A" (creating "A/btparse-0.35/") (2) Modify A/btparse-0.35/Makefile and A/btparse-0.35/src/Makefile as described above (3) Download the Text::BibTeX distribution from CPAN and also untar it into directory "A" (creating A/Text-BibTeX-0.38/") (4) complete the Text::BibTeX installation as usual (it will find the btparse distribution that shares a parent directory with it) Otherwise, perl-text-bibtex fails to build on x86_64 systems. --Ted From helios at cyb0rg.org Mon Feb 8 17:28:07 2010 From: helios at cyb0rg.org (Moritz Rudert) Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:28:07 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] delete request Message-ID: <4B708FF7.6050001@cyb0rg.org> Hi, unfortenately I've forget to rename a kernel package. So please delete kernel26... greetings helios From ranguvar at archlinux.us Mon Feb 8 17:38:24 2010 From: ranguvar at archlinux.us (Ranguvar) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:38:24 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] delete request In-Reply-To: <4B708FF7.6050001@cyb0rg.org> References: <4B708FF7.6050001@cyb0rg.org> Message-ID: <289e994d1002081438g28991301q7eaae0a3581d35bf@mail.gmail.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 17:28, Moritz Rudert wrote: > Hi, > unfortenately I've forget to rename a kernel package. So please delete > kernel26... > > greetings > helios Hehehe... Deleted :p -- Ranguvar [Devin Cofer] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJLcJIfAAoJEHdXKOHe3MUT1BQP/1ilegbyyefvtL5QS2IPWb87 DWTE48q1qtJ5Vb2xAjLY0upj6ZQq5QqnCnFCauTIR7BqeOcv8k+cGSr1j9lZ7n5J qOLnd5Oac+kuhiYaN3ImxWEz+biMcxHV5mSqVgF1qoF+fhEkGyQc3llixiWppUw0 7dXQCKLPruBsUFQArg20MzlYxpygzEhx2NXxvqUtjii7Y24qilrzKp2XfjxpR+F/ x+Ivma1EzoVkITVr5dl9i8eZtClLERUYS0uF9Ht7yZpBrq2hh0ooJ12NX2VG0mG/ /unwq5ghgRrCkFOXOMcy4iJhTwpEFdMjRKRNwYHl0SZnBT2e9YHiU58IxSOvRL07 en1ZWo8x5e0seMtHQeYx+4B64bbm+c8W+84FdjhEAxC83ShKYQ21LnBGbL9K3UKE SciAqVMBIHuqwXJMg8DwszGeFmQZo4QY4fiW6Ht7FI4mAf6QCLp1tlvyIMsrR1+5 DbIPWpYrfftUtA1XRIPkphLM41MATTHzygxyWka5ruLHNVDbdltngoxejjzBqhdZ Sw2/3QKJm1Pz0KKVk7x5ba2l6nGTd573A9CEKa0a3mLexjonvCMIOZQtpw4XYj3O GV3vJ/nFbukkboLLIs2c+ApSt9JZZlMNpkJ8VIktbhJ4l3Qe/Ff0KU3Ml+vB9Nw9 Z3242/nuxoANMVvXfqb8 =9gC+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From helios at cyb0rg.org Mon Feb 8 17:40:02 2010 From: helios at cyb0rg.org (Moritz Rudert) Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:40:02 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] delete request In-Reply-To: <289e994d1002081438g28991301q7eaae0a3581d35bf@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B708FF7.6050001@cyb0rg.org> <289e994d1002081438g28991301q7eaae0a3581d35bf@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B7092C2.4060407@cyb0rg.org> On 02/08/2010 11:38 PM, Ranguvar wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 17:28, Moritz Rudert wrote: > > Hi, > > unfortenately I've forget to rename a kernel package. So please delete > > kernel26... > > > greetings > > helios > > Hehehe... > > Deleted :p > > -- Ranguvar > [Devin Cofer] thanks. i think i go to bed now and upload the package tomorrow... gn8 helios From mathias.buren at gmail.com Mon Feb 8 18:05:06 2010 From: mathias.buren at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Mathias_Bur=C3=A9n?=) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 23:05:06 +0000 Subject: [aur-general] delete request In-Reply-To: <4B7092C2.4060407@cyb0rg.org> References: <4B708FF7.6050001@cyb0rg.org> <289e994d1002081438g28991301q7eaae0a3581d35bf@mail.gmail.com> <4B7092C2.4060407@cyb0rg.org> Message-ID: <8ccc1dbe1002081505o56332cc2v37852c5eb538d4f1@mail.gmail.com> Hi, Please delete kernel26-patchy as I've no use for it. Regards, Mathias From pressh at gmail.com Tue Feb 9 05:49:26 2010 From: pressh at gmail.com (Ronald van Haren) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:49:26 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] [arch-dev] partially inactive In-Reply-To: <4B683572.2010502@archlinux.org> References: <9fcf70360912180331j1250b984n12ab56ea2660155@mail.gmail.com> <9fcf70361002020535v58851b49pe32df3d47197a737@mail.gmail.com> <4B683572.2010502@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <9fcf70361002090249k59445228rc85288074768b65@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Thomas B?chler wrote: > Am 02.02.2010 14:35, schrieb Ronald van Haren: >> so a little update on this. >> It took a bit longer than expected and I'm still not completely done >> with painting and stuff (yikes I really hate painting), > > Who doesn't? > >> but tomorrow >> I'll move my stuff over. > > Congrats. > >> If I'm not mistaken internet connection should be delivered sometime >> during this week. > > Two years ago, it took over 3 months until I had decent internet (I was > war-driving before that, which didn't work out too well, and could > transfer big amounts of data only from work). I hope this works better > for you. > >> Either way I need a few afternoons and evenings >> unpacking stuff so I may not get around in doing much Arch related >> stuff the rest of this week. I will check my mail regularly though. >> >> I'll post an update when it's all done. > > Have fun :) > > > > > So the fun is mostly over. I was able to carpet the last room and set up a workspace there. A lot of stuff is of course still in boxes but that's how it works anyway isn't it (if you don't miss it after 2 months throw it away)... You can consider me active again. I will go through some of the bug reports that got assigned to me in the next few days and see if something needs a quick fix. Thanks for those that took care of some updates/bug report. Ronald From speedvin at archlinux.us Tue Feb 9 07:02:11 2010 From: speedvin at archlinux.us (member SpeedVin) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 13:02:11 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request. In-Reply-To: <20100208095653.45ed9fdc@hell> References: <20100208095653.45ed9fdc@hell> Message-ID: 2010/2/8 Thorsten T?pper > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA224 > > On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:51:32 +0100 > member SpeedVin wrote: > > > Hello. > > Please remove my package grub2-git becouse grub2 git repo is down for > > long time. > > Thanks. > Done, they now use bazaar: > http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/grub-2-download.en.html > > Please supply a direct link to the package in future requests. > - -- > Jabber: atsutane at freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ > Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iFYEARELAAYFAktv0dUACgkQOeTxfyla+/SkiwDgpGkMBzyCIN5wW/B0IJvxRmMr > CdSnXeSqmkucZwDeLleicH7XOJB+6WbDhVpUmvGtHthOo1Scicbm+A== > =Ywzk > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > Thanks again. From l.jirkovsky at gmail.com Tue Feb 9 11:43:42 2010 From: l.jirkovsky at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?THVrw6HFoSBKaXJrb3Zza8O9?=) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 17:43:42 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] package removal request - gelato Message-ID: <736420111002090843v3d9ff31ey3b92f6bd0367543e@mail.gmail.com> Can anyone remove my package gelato [0]? nVidia stopped development about two years ago and now the download become unavailable. Damn I loved that software. It had the fastest image viewer I've ever seen, which was able to display HDR image in seconds on my 9 years old computer. [0] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7711 From atsutane at freethoughts.de Tue Feb 9 12:10:02 2010 From: atsutane at freethoughts.de (Thorsten =?ISO-8859-1?B?VPZwcGVy?=) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 18:10:02 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] package removal request - gelato In-Reply-To: <736420111002090843v3d9ff31ey3b92f6bd0367543e@mail.gmail.com> References: <736420111002090843v3d9ff31ey3b92f6bd0367543e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100209181002.22a033c3@hell> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224 On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 17:43:42 +0100 Luk?? Jirkovsk? wrote: > Can anyone remove my package gelato [0]? nVidia stopped development > about two years ago and now the download become unavailable. > > Damn I loved that software. It had the fastest image viewer I've ever > seen, which was able to display HDR image in seconds on my 9 years old > computer. > > [0] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7711 Done, thank you. - -- Jabber: atsutane at freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iFYEARELAAYFAktxluoACgkQOeTxfyla+/TkGQDgoY1Jvliq1KoehJpVqfRBszOb 6qkg/GodVHqx0wDeIbFZC6VCghh/3HapuMfwnaTntW+ScQSd0cBvww== =EqYH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From l.jirkovsky at gmail.com Tue Feb 9 13:07:14 2010 From: l.jirkovsky at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?THVrw6HFoSBKaXJrb3Zza8O9?=) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 19:07:14 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] package removal request - gelato In-Reply-To: <20100209181002.22a033c3@hell> References: <736420111002090843v3d9ff31ey3b92f6bd0367543e@mail.gmail.com> <20100209181002.22a033c3@hell> Message-ID: <736420111002091007i745d16c3q888e05a843fe720b@mail.gmail.com> On 9 February 2010 18:10, Thorsten T?pper wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA224 > > On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 17:43:42 +0100 > Luk?? Jirkovsk? wrote: > >> Can anyone remove my package gelato [0]? nVidia stopped development >> about two years ago and now the download become unavailable. >> >> Damn I loved that software. It had the fastest image viewer I've ever >> seen, which was able to display HDR image in seconds on my 9 years old >> computer. >> >> [0] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7711 > Done, thank you. > > - -- > Jabber: atsutane at freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ > Key: 295AFBF4 ? ? FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iFYEARELAAYFAktxluoACgkQOeTxfyla+/TkGQDgoY1Jvliq1KoehJpVqfRBszOb > 6qkg/GodVHqx0wDeIbFZC6VCghh/3HapuMfwnaTntW+ScQSd0cBvww== > =EqYH > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > Thanks From mail.sensenmann at googlemail.com Tue Feb 9 19:03:12 2010 From: mail.sensenmann at googlemail.com (Christian Scharkus) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:03:12 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] dpkg outdated - orphan request Message-ID: <717b5781002091603q3e231642u5f90fd8f4618ed46@mail.gmail.com> Hi. I informed the maintainer of the dpkg package yesterday via mail that his package is outdated and he should update it. I flagged the package itself as outdated, too. I haven't received an answer yet but someone removed the flag from the package. The package itself is a depency of another outdated package (debhelper). The packages can't be build because the sauce isn't on the servers anymore and the maintainer of debhelper is unable to update his PKGBUILD because of dpkg as missing dep. So I request to orphan the dpkg package in order to enable myself to update it. Thanks and Greetings Christian Scharkus From stefan-husmann at t-online.de Tue Feb 9 19:57:41 2010 From: stefan-husmann at t-online.de (Stefan Husmann) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:57:41 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] dpkg outdated - orphan request In-Reply-To: <717b5781002091603q3e231642u5f90fd8f4618ed46@mail.gmail.com> References: <717b5781002091603q3e231642u5f90fd8f4618ed46@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B720485.4050305@t-online.de> Am 10.02.2010 01:03, schrieb Christian Scharkus: > Hi. > > I informed the maintainer of the dpkg package yesterday via mail that > his package is outdated and he should update it. > I flagged the package itself as outdated, too. > I haven't received an answer yet but someone removed the flag from the > package. The package itself is a depency of another outdated package > (debhelper). > The packages can't be build because the sauce isn't on the servers > anymore and the maintainer of debhelper is unable to update his > PKGBUILD because of dpkg as missing dep. > So I request to orphan the dpkg package in order to enable myself to update it. > > Thanks and Greetings > > Christian Scharkus > Hello, normally I would say that one day is too short to expect answers. But if the maintainer has the time to unflag his package, he should also have the time to drop a short remark why he did so or why he does not want to update. So, orphaning. From baker.chris.3 at gmail.com Tue Feb 9 20:12:19 2010 From: baker.chris.3 at gmail.com (Chris Baker) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 18:12:19 -0700 Subject: [aur-general] removal request: python-nltk-noyaml Message-ID: <9a488bc31002091712s4a354d32oa76e04224a831058@mail.gmail.com> This package is obsolete. The default nltk installation (package python-nltk) now requires yaml as a dependency instead of bundling it. From ranguvar at archlinux.us Tue Feb 9 20:54:13 2010 From: ranguvar at archlinux.us (Ranguvar) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 20:54:13 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] removal request: python-nltk-noyaml In-Reply-To: <9a488bc31002091712s4a354d32oa76e04224a831058@mail.gmail.com> References: <9a488bc31002091712s4a354d32oa76e04224a831058@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <289e994d1002091754h32e48941j63867a95ca469eb6@mail.gmail.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 20:12, Chris Baker wrote: > This package is obsolete. The default nltk installation (package > python-nltk) now requires yaml as a dependency instead of bundling it. Deleted, thank you. -- Ranguvar [Devin Cofer] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJLchG4AAoJEHdXKOHe3MUTPA8P+QHS1wVl1eEVmEEdLpGLyqhJ 5nZckWBpk1/99YvQ5HS9hg6SDr+kfTU/LN1Np3XBHYMCfi4S6REXdP8ZKZRh4h4R GBByH3J47UkRiLZbafIZk5iF71OuJD305Mb3PigdGFwNiasx1h9zUobIm6e5d8vu boZy09fqKJQ5Actu4+R+m6cZb5GqLEmaJQV/U0yGuzu3Hxmhs66Dm5FMrk6WQM9H sqNFaL3c2P4DRbqYDn1AOgZzNXKnmG+UcfmLWfhYhMOcs6egdKfqMK1vzcLiMzQc hjaQk/KSTXum5yth+J6PuAuXhsG3VYbDSc+JCxKfcO6EO2EFF+StmTwlnRYXdxPk CgIGVUFm2hfEW5/HpvS26yN9glvaV7vAebuRhbEGA2tJf5v6rkWzG+THj4Nqu719 4xi8Ck1GWoXr66h6GVmaUfOPd8pFwjCXgYRIAXxkISaTZEn5N7WCt9EMzfz1VYPQ exrS8qHR768oW71MhOQx80GjJvv0r32ObmvlnfgpJErn3YPWuw+mv7XvMTfpi43A 8Jjg4XCt1QuYIq8/dLIi7zvmvly5UDy85u1abz0RVEZCyMaLFc8V+CebYLtldYrh i+osfuGYnGlq+SQLA85z+lkN5EhnRSxjmClZZ/0+Ye/KDxbHI3D9e9zQH4CFURS3 kPEREYDYMjZO+RdU+I7W =HW0j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From andrea at archlinux.org Tue Feb 9 21:35:26 2010 From: andrea at archlinux.org (Andrea Scarpino) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:35:26 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] orphaned packages Message-ID: <201002100335.26523.andrea@archlinux.org> Hi TUs, this is not the Daniel list. Only to let you know that I orphaned these packages: bin2iso ccd2iso devede gtk-engine-murrine gtk-kde4 ibam iftop imdbpy mdf2iso mmpython murrine-themes-collection nrg2iso pypanel subdownloader tora free to take them. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer From daenyth+arch at gmail.com Tue Feb 9 21:48:10 2010 From: daenyth+arch at gmail.com (Daenyth Blank) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 21:48:10 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] orphaned packages In-Reply-To: <201002100335.26523.andrea@archlinux.org> References: <201002100335.26523.andrea@archlinux.org> Message-ID: On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 21:35, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > iftop Adopted From giovanni at archlinux.org Tue Feb 9 21:54:35 2010 From: giovanni at archlinux.org (Giovanni Scafora) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:54:35 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] minitube Message-ID: Hi TUs, only to let you know that I just orphaned community/minitube. Free to take it or I will be moving it to the AUR. -- Arch Linux Developer http://www.archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.it From farhany at xaviya.com Tue Feb 9 22:26:08 2010 From: farhany at xaviya.com (Farhan Yousaf) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 22:26:08 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] orphaned packages In-Reply-To: <201002100335.26523.andrea@archlinux.org> References: <201002100335.26523.andrea@archlinux.org> Message-ID: On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > Hi TUs, > this is not the Daniel list. > Only to let you know that I orphaned these packages: > > bin2iso > ccd2iso > devede > gtk-engine-murrine > gtk-kde4 > ibam > iftop > imdbpy > mdf2iso > mmpython > murrine-themes-collection > nrg2iso > pypanel > subdownloader > tora > I will adopt some too. Thanks, Farhan From andrea at archlinux.org Tue Feb 9 22:28:36 2010 From: andrea at archlinux.org (Andrea Scarpino) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:28:36 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] orphaned packages In-Reply-To: References: <201002100335.26523.andrea@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <201002100428.37159.andrea@archlinux.org> On Wednesday 10 February 2010 04:26:08 Farhan Yousaf wrote: > I will adopt some too. ATM they are still in [community]. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer From farhany at xaviya.com Tue Feb 9 22:35:48 2010 From: farhany at xaviya.com (Farhan Yousaf) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 22:35:48 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] orphaned packages In-Reply-To: References: <201002100335.26523.andrea@archlinux.org> Message-ID: On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Farhan Yousaf wrote: > bin2iso >> ccd2iso >> mdf2iso >> nrg2iso >> > Any reason I can't find ANY of those in AUR? Farhan From farhany at xaviya.com Tue Feb 9 22:42:10 2010 From: farhany at xaviya.com (Farhan Yousaf) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 22:42:10 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] orphaned packages In-Reply-To: <201002100428.37159.andrea@archlinux.org> References: <201002100335.26523.andrea@archlinux.org> <201002100428.37159.andrea@archlinux.org> Message-ID: On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > On Wednesday 10 February 2010 04:26:08 Farhan Yousaf wrote: > > I will adopt some too. > ATM they are still in [community]. > So they need to be migrated to AUR or what is the process to maintain them? Thanks, Farhan From allan at archlinux.org Tue Feb 9 22:43:40 2010 From: allan at archlinux.org (Allan McRae) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:43:40 +1000 Subject: [aur-general] orphaned packages In-Reply-To: References: <201002100335.26523.andrea@archlinux.org> <201002100428.37159.andrea@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <4B722B6C.4010301@archlinux.org> On 10/02/10 13:42, Farhan Yousaf wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Andrea Scarpinowrote: > >> On Wednesday 10 February 2010 04:26:08 Farhan Yousaf wrote: >>> I will adopt some too. >> ATM they are still in [community]. >> > > So they need to be migrated to AUR or what is the process to maintain them? > We prefer to keep packages in the repos if they have a maintainer. So wait to see if a TU will take them. From ghost1227 at archlinux.us Tue Feb 9 22:48:29 2010 From: ghost1227 at archlinux.us (Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 21:48:29 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] orphaned packages In-Reply-To: <4B722B6C.4010301@archlinux.org> References: <201002100335.26523.andrea@archlinux.org> <201002100428.37159.andrea@archlinux.org> <4B722B6C.4010301@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <8a2b1b591002091948r678f73bmdfd8ca09e02afd3a@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 10/02/10 13:42, Farhan Yousaf wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Andrea >> Scarpinowrote: >> >>> On Wednesday 10 February 2010 04:26:08 Farhan Yousaf wrote: >>>> >>>> I will adopt some too. >>> >>> ATM they are still in [community]. >>> >> >> So they need to be migrated to AUR or what is the process to maintain >> them? >> > > We prefer to keep packages in the repos if they have a maintainer. ?So wait > to see if a TU will take them. > > bin2iso ccd2iso devede gtk-engine-murrine mdf2iso nrg2iso adopted From Firmicus at gmx.net Wed Feb 10 03:25:57 2010 From: Firmicus at gmx.net (Firmicus) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:25:57 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Bug in perl-text-bibtext build script for x86_64 platform In-Reply-To: <4B7068E1.4020008@tedpavlic.com> References: <4B7068E1.4020008@tedpavlic.com> Message-ID: <4B726D95.2040203@gmx.net> Hi Ted, Thanks for this. I actually found a PKGBUILD for version 0.38 on my computer dating from last June which obviously I had forgotten to upload to AUR :( Although the C*FLAGS with -fPIC are set globally in there, it builds and works just fine on my x86_64 system. I have updated it on AUR yesterday. Can you test it please? If your problem persists I will try to follow your suggestion. I am actually very interested in having this in AUR, since it is a dependency of Biber (http://biblatex-biber.sf.net), of which I am a developer. It will be officially released next week-end, but someone else put in in AUR already long ago (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27998) ;) Best, F On 08/02/2010 20:41, Ted Pavlic wrote: > AUR -- > > I've sent a message to the package maintainer about this, but it > has been a while since there has been an update, and so I wanted to > send something here too for comment and archival purposes. At the > moment, the perl-text-bibtex package fails on x86_64 systems because > it tries to link libraries built without -fPIC to object files built > with -fPIC. > > On x86_64 machines, when building the perl-text-bibtex package, it > is necessary to add: > > -fPIC > > to the btparse compiler flags before running "make". That is, the > PKGBUILD should... > > (1) Download Text::BibTeX from CPAN > (2) Run "perl Makefile.PL", which will fetch a btparse distribution > and untar it into a directory that it symlinks to "btparse" > (3) Change to "btparse" and add "-fPIC" to CFLAGS, CPPFLAGS, and > CXXFLAGS in the Makefile and src/Makefile files > (4) Change back to the Text::BibTeX root and run "make" > > Otherwise, the linker will complain because the Perl libraries will be > built with -fPIC and the btparse libraries will not be... so they'll > be incompatible for linking. > > ALTERNATIVELY, the PKGBUILD could... > > (1) Download a btparse distribution and untar it into directory "A" > (creating "A/btparse-0.35/") > (2) Modify A/btparse-0.35/Makefile and A/btparse-0.35/src/Makefile as > described above > (3) Download the Text::BibTeX distribution from CPAN and also untar it > into directory "A" (creating A/Text-BibTeX-0.38/") > (4) complete the Text::BibTeX installation as usual (it will find the > btparse distribution that shares a parent directory with it) > > Otherwise, perl-text-bibtex fails to build on x86_64 systems. > > --Ted > From schivmeister at gmail.com Wed Feb 10 04:18:33 2010 From: schivmeister at gmail.com (Ray Rashif) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:18:33 +0800 Subject: [aur-general] orphaned packages In-Reply-To: <201002100335.26523.andrea@archlinux.org> References: <201002100335.26523.andrea@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <291cdeab1002100118o42f711a6wb0e73418fe13ad42@mail.gmail.com> On 10 February 2010 10:35, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > imdbpy > subdownloader Would take these but it seems you haven't disowned subdownloader. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD From ronald at archlinux.org Wed Feb 10 05:49:22 2010 From: ronald at archlinux.org (Ronald van Haren) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:49:22 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] decrease package workload in [community] Message-ID: <9fcf70361002100249p6dee7cdeh724e0f4a6ea998cf@mail.gmail.com> Hi TUs, I'd like to drop some/most of my packages in [community] to some of you guys so I can focus more on packages in [core] and [extra], and maybe do some coding when I find time. For now I'll keep maintaining them as most of these belong in a binary repo (though some I don't mind dropping to unsupported), so let's see where this gets us. Just shoot or simply take something you're interested in. Some packages need to be taken as group, but that seems fairly obvious. Ronald From l.jirkovsky at gmail.com Wed Feb 10 06:33:46 2010 From: l.jirkovsky at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?THVrw6HFoSBKaXJrb3Zza8O9?=) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:33:46 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] dpkg outdated - orphan request In-Reply-To: <4B720485.4050305@t-online.de> References: <717b5781002091603q3e231642u5f90fd8f4618ed46@mail.gmail.com> <4B720485.4050305@t-online.de> Message-ID: <736420111002100333n556dfa7cxa1c74297007bf842@mail.gmail.com> > > Hello, > > normally I would say that one day is too short to expect answers. But if > the maintainer has the time to unflag his package, he should also have the > time to drop a short remark why he did so or why he does not want to update. > > So, orphaning. > I think anyone can unflag package out-of-date. From andrea at archlinux.org Wed Feb 10 07:37:26 2010 From: andrea at archlinux.org (Andrea Scarpino) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:37:26 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] orphaned packages In-Reply-To: <291cdeab1002100118o42f711a6wb0e73418fe13ad42@mail.gmail.com> References: <201002100335.26523.andrea@archlinux.org> <291cdeab1002100118o42f711a6wb0e73418fe13ad42@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <201002101337.26791.andrea@archlinux.org> On Wednesday 10 February 2010 10:18:33 Ray Rashif wrote: > Would take these but it seems you haven't disowned subdownloader. Done. Anyway, you can disown packages. Remember mmpython too (as subdownloader deps). Thanks -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer From schivmeister at gmail.com Wed Feb 10 07:58:53 2010 From: schivmeister at gmail.com (Ray Rashif) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:58:53 +0800 Subject: [aur-general] orphaned packages In-Reply-To: <201002101337.26791.andrea@archlinux.org> References: <201002100335.26523.andrea@archlinux.org> <291cdeab1002100118o42f711a6wb0e73418fe13ad42@mail.gmail.com> <201002101337.26791.andrea@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <291cdeab1002100458g5e7735fcha2e40d04b188f6b2@mail.gmail.com> On 10 February 2010 20:37, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > On Wednesday 10 February 2010 10:18:33 Ray Rashif wrote: >> Would take these but it seems you haven't disowned subdownloader. > Done. Anyway, you can disown packages. > Remember mmpython too (as subdownloader deps). Yeah I know that, but just in case you changed your mind :) subdownloader --| imdbpy --| mmpython Adopted. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD From schivmeister at gmail.com Wed Feb 10 08:15:10 2010 From: schivmeister at gmail.com (Ray Rashif) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:15:10 +0800 Subject: [aur-general] orphaned packages In-Reply-To: <201002100335.26523.andrea@archlinux.org> References: <201002100335.26523.andrea@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <291cdeab1002100515g7de04e2i258cc4831e31d400@mail.gmail.com> On 10 February 2010 10:35, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > Hi TUs, > this is not the Daniel list. > Only to let you know that I orphaned these packages: > > bin2iso > ccd2iso > devede > gtk-engine-murrine > gtk-kde4 > ibam > iftop > imdbpy > mdf2iso > mmpython > murrine-themes-collection > nrg2iso > pypanel > subdownloader > tora Hey Andrea I recall you owned schismtracker [1] once and wanted to drop it to unsupported. I think I replied in that thread that once I got the account on sigurd I'd take it, so you probably left it alone. But I've decided that it's not of much use for community, so you can drop it (there were no other objections). [1] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=schismtracker -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD From angvp at archlinux.com.ve Wed Feb 10 08:29:33 2010 From: angvp at archlinux.com.ve (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Angel_Vel=E1squez?=) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:29:33 -0300 Subject: [aur-general] orphaned packages In-Reply-To: <201002100335.26523.andrea@archlinux.org> References: <201002100335.26523.andrea@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <330e48781002100529s3e2d39dfj443930d9ba8dade5@mail.gmail.com> > tora Adopted -- Angel Vel?squez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com From stefan-husmann at t-online.de Wed Feb 10 08:48:08 2010 From: stefan-husmann at t-online.de (Stefan Husmann) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:48:08 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] decrease package workload in [community] In-Reply-To: <9fcf70361002100249p6dee7cdeh724e0f4a6ea998cf@mail.gmail.com> References: <9fcf70361002100249p6dee7cdeh724e0f4a6ea998cf@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B72B918.8040009@t-online.de> Am 10.02.2010 11:49, schrieb Ronald van Haren: > Hi TUs, > > I'd like to drop some/most of my packages in [community] to some of > you guys so I can focus more on packages in [core] and [extra], and > maybe do some coding when I find time. > > For now I'll keep maintaining them as most of these belong in a binary > repo (though some I don't mind dropping to unsupported), so let's see > where this gets us. > > Just shoot or simply take something you're interested in. Some > packages need to be taken as group, but that seems fairly obvious. > > Ronald > Hello I can take qtoctave. Regards Stefan From ted at tedpavlic.com Wed Feb 10 12:42:35 2010 From: ted at tedpavlic.com (Ted Pavlic) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:42:35 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Bug in perl-text-bibtext build script for x86_64 platform In-Reply-To: <4B726D95.2040203@gmx.net> References: <4B7068E1.4020008@tedpavlic.com> <4B726D95.2040203@gmx.net> Message-ID: <4B72F00B.9080200@tedpavlic.com> Firmicus -- > Thanks for this. I actually found a PKGBUILD for version 0.38 on my > computer dating from last June which obviously I had forgotten to upload > to AUR :( Although the C*FLAGS with -fPIC are set globally in there, it > builds and works just fine on my x86_64 system. I have updated it on AUR > yesterday. Can you test it please? If your problem persists I will try > to follow your suggestion. The version on AUR seems to still be for 0.37 (and I still get the build error, pasted below). Did you mean to attach an updated PKGBUILD? Thanks -- Ted The error (which is fixed by adding -fPIC to Makefiles in btparse): ===== Running Mkbootstrap for Text::BibTeX () chmod 644 BibTeX.bs rm -f blib/arch/auto/Text/BibTeX/BibTeX.so cc -shared -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -L/usr/local/lib -fstack-protector BibTeX.o btxs_support.o -o blib/arch/auto/Text/BibTeX/BibTeX.so btparse/src/.libs/libbtparse.a\ \ /usr/bin/ld: btparse/src/.libs/libbtparse.a(input.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.8' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC btparse/src/.libs/libbtparse.a: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [blib/arch/auto/Text/BibTeX/BibTeX.so] Error 1 ==> ERROR: Build Failed. ===== > I am actually very interested in having this in AUR, since it is a > dependency of Biber (http://biblatex-biber.sf.net), of which I am a > developer. It will be officially released next week-end, but someone > else put in in AUR already long ago > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27998) ;) > > Best, > F > > On 08/02/2010 20:41, Ted Pavlic wrote: >> AUR -- >> >> I've sent a message to the package maintainer about this, but it has >> been a while since there has been an update, and so I wanted to send >> something here too for comment and archival purposes. At the moment, >> the perl-text-bibtex package fails on x86_64 systems because it tries >> to link libraries built without -fPIC to object files built with -fPIC. >> >> On x86_64 machines, when building the perl-text-bibtex package, it is >> necessary to add: >> >> -fPIC >> >> to the btparse compiler flags before running "make". That is, the >> PKGBUILD should... >> >> (1) Download Text::BibTeX from CPAN >> (2) Run "perl Makefile.PL", which will fetch a btparse distribution >> and untar it into a directory that it symlinks to "btparse" >> (3) Change to "btparse" and add "-fPIC" to CFLAGS, CPPFLAGS, and >> CXXFLAGS in the Makefile and src/Makefile files >> (4) Change back to the Text::BibTeX root and run "make" >> >> Otherwise, the linker will complain because the Perl libraries will be >> built with -fPIC and the btparse libraries will not be... so they'll >> be incompatible for linking. >> >> ALTERNATIVELY, the PKGBUILD could... >> >> (1) Download a btparse distribution and untar it into directory "A" >> (creating "A/btparse-0.35/") >> (2) Modify A/btparse-0.35/Makefile and A/btparse-0.35/src/Makefile as >> described above >> (3) Download the Text::BibTeX distribution from CPAN and also untar it >> into directory "A" (creating A/Text-BibTeX-0.38/") >> (4) complete the Text::BibTeX installation as usual (it will find the >> btparse distribution that shares a parent directory with it) >> >> Otherwise, perl-text-bibtex fails to build on x86_64 systems. >> >> --Ted >> > > -- Ted Pavlic Please visit my 2009 d'Feet ALS walk page: http://web.alsa.org/goto/tedp My family appreciates your support in the fight to defeat ALS. From mail.sensenmann at googlemail.com Wed Feb 10 14:52:00 2010 From: mail.sensenmann at googlemail.com (Christian Scharkus) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:52:00 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] dpkg outdated - orphan request In-Reply-To: <736420111002100333n556dfa7cxa1c74297007bf842@mail.gmail.com> References: <717b5781002091603q3e231642u5f90fd8f4618ed46@mail.gmail.com> <4B720485.4050305@t-online.de> <736420111002100333n556dfa7cxa1c74297007bf842@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <717b5781002101152y4da13588r403834d28a539807@mail.gmail.com> I guess so. That's why I wrote someone. But seriously why should anyone but the maintainer unflag an outdated package? And after all I don't stick on it if he wants it back but he was notified by comment some time ago that the package was out of date :/ 2010/2/10 Luk?? Jirkovsk? : >> >> Hello, >> >> normally I would say that one day is too short to expect answers. But if >> the maintainer has the time to unflag his package, he should also have the >> time to drop a short remark why he did so or why he does not want to update. >> >> So, orphaning. >> > > I think anyone can unflag package out-of-date. > From biru.ionut at gmail.com Wed Feb 10 16:04:57 2010 From: biru.ionut at gmail.com (Ionut Biru) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:04:57 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] dpkg outdated - orphan request In-Reply-To: <717b5781002101152y4da13588r403834d28a539807@mail.gmail.com> References: <717b5781002091603q3e231642u5f90fd8f4618ed46@mail.gmail.com> <4B720485.4050305@t-online.de> <736420111002100333n556dfa7cxa1c74297007bf842@mail.gmail.com> <717b5781002101152y4da13588r403834d28a539807@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B731F79.6020308@gmail.com> On 02/10/2010 09:52 PM, Christian Scharkus wrote: > I guess so. That's why I wrote someone. But seriously why should > anyone but the maintainer unflag an outdated package? > And after all I don't stick on it if he wants it back but he was > notified by comment some time ago that the package was out of date :/ > http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=90779 the previous maintainer responded -- Ionut From Firmicus at gmx.net Wed Feb 10 16:26:59 2010 From: Firmicus at gmx.net (Firmicus) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:26:59 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Bug in perl-text-bibtext build script for x86_64 platform In-Reply-To: <4B72F00B.9080200@tedpavlic.com> References: <4B7068E1.4020008@tedpavlic.com> <4B726D95.2040203@gmx.net> <4B72F00B.9080200@tedpavlic.com> Message-ID: <4B7324A3.5080201@gmx.net> On 10/02/2010 18:42, Ted Pavlic wrote: > Firmicus -- > >> Thanks for this. I actually found a PKGBUILD for version 0.38 on my >> computer dating from last June which obviously I had forgotten to upload >> to AUR :( Although the C*FLAGS with -fPIC are set globally in there, it >> builds and works just fine on my x86_64 system. I have updated it on AUR >> yesterday. Can you test it please? If your problem persists I will try >> to follow your suggestion. > > The version on AUR seems to still be for 0.37 (and I still get the > build error, pasted below). Did you mean to attach an updated PKGBUILD? No, I really uploaded my PKGBUILD for 0.38 to AUR yesterday using aurup. Seems it never made it to the server. Will try again, but see attachment now. F -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: PKGBUILD URL: From ilbardo at gmail.com Wed Feb 10 19:30:21 2010 From: ilbardo at gmail.com (bardo) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:30:21 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] [FYI] New package in community: rtkit Message-ID: Hi all. I just added (the x86_64 version of) rtkit to [community], it's a new dependency for the pulseaudio rebuild I'm going to upload shortly. From arch-general at fukawi2.nl Wed Feb 10 22:23:37 2010 From: arch-general at fukawi2.nl (Phillip Smith) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:23:37 +1100 Subject: [aur-general] postgresql-client Message-ID: <33be1b4c1002101923y5f22b327q2f543ca52f898bd6@mail.gmail.com> As per the below bug report, can my postgresql-client package be deleted from the AUR once this new package hits the repos please? :) http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16495 From ghost1227 at archlinux.us Wed Feb 10 22:28:30 2010 From: ghost1227 at archlinux.us (Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:28:30 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] postgresql-client In-Reply-To: <33be1b4c1002101923y5f22b327q2f543ca52f898bd6@mail.gmail.com> References: <33be1b4c1002101923y5f22b327q2f543ca52f898bd6@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <8a2b1b591002101928u7adf3e72qedd5c156abfb8e8a@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Phillip Smith wrote: > As per the below bug report, can my postgresql-client package be > deleted from the AUR once this new package hits the repos please? :) > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16495 > It can, but the current package doesn't incorporate the client-only install, just adds provides/conflicts. If others (ie the actual maintainer) thinks it's a good idea to actually include that, then i have no problem adding it. From chris.g.27 at gmail.com Wed Feb 10 23:16:58 2010 From: chris.g.27 at gmail.com (Chris Giles) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:16:58 +1100 Subject: [aur-general] dpkg outdated - orphan request In-Reply-To: <4B731F79.6020308@gmail.com> References: <717b5781002091603q3e231642u5f90fd8f4618ed46@mail.gmail.com> <4B720485.4050305@t-online.de> <736420111002100333n556dfa7cxa1c74297007bf842@mail.gmail.com> <717b5781002101152y4da13588r403834d28a539807@mail.gmail.com> <4B731F79.6020308@gmail.com> Message-ID: <2c36cc541002102016j1ad4b737mfea450ef7407ebc9@mail.gmail.com> Thus far, I've provided two responses in a forum thread. Based on certain factors, I'm not happy about losing this package and I want to reclaim its ownership. From allan at archlinux.org Thu Feb 11 00:00:19 2010 From: allan at archlinux.org (Allan McRae) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:00:19 +1000 Subject: [aur-general] dpkg outdated - orphan request In-Reply-To: <2c36cc541002102016j1ad4b737mfea450ef7407ebc9@mail.gmail.com> References: <717b5781002091603q3e231642u5f90fd8f4618ed46@mail.gmail.com> <4B720485.4050305@t-online.de> <736420111002100333n556dfa7cxa1c74297007bf842@mail.gmail.com> <717b5781002101152y4da13588r403834d28a539807@mail.gmail.com> <4B731F79.6020308@gmail.com> <2c36cc541002102016j1ad4b737mfea450ef7407ebc9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B738EE3.2020108@archlinux.org> On 11/02/10 14:16, Chris Giles wrote: > Thus far, I've provided two responses in a forum > thread. > Based on certain factors, I'm not happy about losing this package and I want > to reclaim its ownership. > I looks like the source for the version 1.4.25, which you were holding it at, has not been available at the location in the PKGBUILD since 2010-01-12. The was a comment in the page on 2010-02-03 saying 1.4.28 was out. How many times was it flagged out of date and you just unflagged? From l.jirkovsky at gmail.com Thu Feb 11 02:33:15 2010 From: l.jirkovsky at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?THVrw6HFoSBKaXJrb3Zza8O9?=) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:33:15 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] dpkg outdated - orphan request In-Reply-To: <2c36cc541002102016j1ad4b737mfea450ef7407ebc9@mail.gmail.com> References: <717b5781002091603q3e231642u5f90fd8f4618ed46@mail.gmail.com> <4B720485.4050305@t-online.de> <736420111002100333n556dfa7cxa1c74297007bf842@mail.gmail.com> <717b5781002101152y4da13588r403834d28a539807@mail.gmail.com> <4B731F79.6020308@gmail.com> <2c36cc541002102016j1ad4b737mfea450ef7407ebc9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <736420111002102333v19c1a2bcmf38b49327b7e9505@mail.gmail.com> On 11 February 2010 05:16, Chris Giles wrote: > Thus far, I've provided two responses in a forum > thread. > Based on certain factors, I'm not happy about losing this package and I want > to reclaim its ownership. > I guess that it was caused by web browser cache. Next time try reloading page several times (or in Firefox use Ctrl + F5). Anyway there are some users which flag package out of date for no reason (it happened to me that someone flagged my package but no new version was out, it happened especially with svn packages) so I can understand original maintainer unflagged it if he didn't saw new version. Lukas From mail.sensenmann at googlemail.com Thu Feb 11 02:40:17 2010 From: mail.sensenmann at googlemail.com (Christian Scharkus) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:40:17 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] dpkg outdated - orphan request In-Reply-To: <736420111002102333v19c1a2bcmf38b49327b7e9505@mail.gmail.com> References: <717b5781002091603q3e231642u5f90fd8f4618ed46@mail.gmail.com> <4B720485.4050305@t-online.de> <736420111002100333n556dfa7cxa1c74297007bf842@mail.gmail.com> <717b5781002101152y4da13588r403834d28a539807@mail.gmail.com> <4B731F79.6020308@gmail.com> <2c36cc541002102016j1ad4b737mfea450ef7407ebc9@mail.gmail.com> <736420111002102333v19c1a2bcmf38b49327b7e9505@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <717b5781002102340g51704284x2253487c490201d4@mail.gmail.com> But several users stating there is a new version in stable and an Mail about it should get the maintainer in question start to think about it. Maybe it was just the cache especially if he's checking regular for new versions. As I wrote in the forum I have no problem with giving the package back. 2010/2/11 Luk?? Jirkovsk? : > On 11 February 2010 05:16, Chris Giles wrote: >> Thus far, I've provided two responses in a forum >> thread. >> Based on certain factors, I'm not happy about losing this package and I want >> to reclaim its ownership. >> > > I guess that it was caused by web browser cache. Next time try > reloading page several times (or in Firefox use Ctrl + F5). > > Anyway there are some users which flag package out of date for no > reason (it happened to me that someone flagged my package but no new > version was out, it happened especially with svn packages) so I can > understand original maintainer unflagged it if he didn't saw new > version. > > Lukas > From stefan-husmann at t-online.de Thu Feb 11 05:54:19 2010 From: stefan-husmann at t-online.de (Stefan Husmann) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:54:19 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Bug in perl-text-bibtext build script for x86_64 platform In-Reply-To: <4B7324A3.5080201@gmx.net> References: <4B7068E1.4020008@tedpavlic.com> <4B726D95.2040203@gmx.net> <4B72F00B.9080200@tedpavlic.com> <4B7324A3.5080201@gmx.net> Message-ID: <4B73E1DB.7010304@t-online.de> Am 10.02.2010 22:26, schrieb Firmicus: > On 10/02/2010 18:42, Ted Pavlic wrote: >> Firmicus -- >> >>> Thanks for this. I actually found a PKGBUILD for version 0.38 on my >>> computer dating from last June which obviously I had forgotten to upload >>> to AUR :( Although the C*FLAGS with -fPIC are set globally in there, it >>> builds and works just fine on my x86_64 system. I have updated it on AUR >>> yesterday. Can you test it please? If your problem persists I will try >>> to follow your suggestion. >> >> The version on AUR seems to still be for 0.37 (and I still get the >> build error, pasted below). Did you mean to attach an updated PKGBUILD? > > No, I really uploaded my PKGBUILD for 0.38 to AUR yesterday using aurup. > Seems it never made it to the server. Will try again, but see attachment > now. > > F > Hello, aurup does not seem to work anymore. Try aurploader (from Xyne) or use the AUR webinterface for uploading. Regards Stefan From biru.ionut at gmail.com Thu Feb 11 06:56:38 2010 From: biru.ionut at gmail.com (Ionut Biru) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:56:38 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] attention to pidgin-facebookchat users Message-ID: <4B73F076.7080300@gmail.com> Hi, I?m going to remove this package from community and move it to aur because Facebook now has support for XMPP, along with it also is moved json-glib. Severals links that you may be interested: * http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pidgin#Facebook_XMPP * http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=297991732130 -- Ionut From Firmicus at gmx.net Thu Feb 11 07:42:54 2010 From: Firmicus at gmx.net (Firmicus) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:42:54 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Bug in perl-text-bibtext build script for x86_64 platform In-Reply-To: <4B73E1DB.7010304@t-online.de> References: <4B7068E1.4020008@tedpavlic.com> <4B726D95.2040203@gmx.net> <4B72F00B.9080200@tedpavlic.com> <4B7324A3.5080201@gmx.net> <4B73E1DB.7010304@t-online.de> Message-ID: <4B73FB4E.9000802@gmx.net> On 11/02/2010 11:54, Stefan Husmann wrote: > > aurup does not seem to work anymore. Try aurploader (from Xyne) or use > the > AUR webinterface for uploading. > All right, thanks for that info! F From allan at archlinux.org Thu Feb 11 10:41:09 2010 From: allan at archlinux.org (Allan McRae) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:41:09 +1000 Subject: [aur-general] shaman Message-ID: <4B742515.3060806@archlinux.org> Any TU want to continue maintaining aqpm+shaman in [community]? At least aqpm needs updating and both need rebuilt for the latest qt/polkit-qt. Shaman may need updating but the upstream versioning is strange so I have no idea if that is a beta release or not... I do not have anything Qt based on my system and do not feel motivated to download it to continue maintaining this package myself. At the moment it does not need kdelibs, but in the future this will become mandatory. Again, a dependency I do not wish to download. If I have no response by tomorrow, I will move it to the AUR. Allan From djszapi at archlinux.us Thu Feb 11 10:42:35 2010 From: djszapi at archlinux.us (Laszlo Papp) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:42:35 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] shaman In-Reply-To: <4B742515.3060806@archlinux.org> References: <4B742515.3060806@archlinux.org> Message-ID: On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > Any TU want to continue maintaining aqpm+shaman in [community]? ? At least > aqpm needs updating and both need rebuilt for the latest qt/polkit-qt. > ?Shaman may need updating but the upstream versioning is strange so I have > no idea if that is a beta release or not... Aqpm2 and shaman2 is the actual ones, I don't know what to do with these ones at all ... Best Regards, Laszlo Papp From allan at archlinux.org Thu Feb 11 10:51:29 2010 From: allan at archlinux.org (Allan McRae) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:51:29 +1000 Subject: [aur-general] shaman In-Reply-To: References: <4B742515.3060806@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <4B742781.3000107@archlinux.org> On 12/02/10 01:42, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Allan McRae wrote: >> Any TU want to continue maintaining aqpm+shaman in [community]? At least >> aqpm needs updating and both need rebuilt for the latest qt/polkit-qt. >> Shaman may need updating but the upstream versioning is strange so I have >> no idea if that is a beta release or not... > > Aqpm2 and shaman2 is the actual ones, I don't know what to do with > these ones at all ... Well, no... because they have not had a stable release yet. I am talking about the update from 1.2.1 to 1.2.80. Allan From allan at archlinux.org Thu Feb 11 10:53:31 2010 From: allan at archlinux.org (Allan McRae) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:53:31 +1000 Subject: [aur-general] Packages for adoption Message-ID: <4B7427FB.6060600@archlinux.org> Here is a list of packages I no longer wish to maintain in [community]. They all hardly ever need updating, apart from winetricks. If no-one adopts them in the next few days, then they will be dropped to the AUR. I do not think I need to orphan the packages for others to adopt them, but let me know if I do. gimmix (+libnxml) gnome-cups-manager gnome-subtitles gnomebaker gwget mozplugger pida pyenchant (needs renamed) python-pyalsaaudio python-sexy supertuxkart winetricks wine_gecko xfce4-places-plugin Also, I have orphaned plib which is required by simgear (maintained by Sergey) Allan From malte at zearan.de Thu Feb 11 11:20:50 2010 From: malte at zearan.de (Malte Rabenseifner) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:20:50 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Packages for adoption In-Reply-To: <4B7427FB.6060600@archlinux.org> References: <4B7427FB.6060600@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <9eec7c213a41fa4a416e044fa9b3a706.squirrel@192.168.9.11> On Thu, February 11, 2010 16:53, Allan McRae wrote: > Here is a list of packages I no longer wish to maintain in [community]. > They all hardly ever need updating, apart from winetricks. If no-one > adopts them in the next few days, then they will be dropped to the AUR. > I do not think I need to orphan the packages for others to adopt them, > but let me know if I do. > > gimmix (+libnxml) > gnome-cups-manager > gnome-subtitles > gnomebaker > gwget > mozplugger > pida > pyenchant (needs renamed) > python-pyalsaaudio > python-sexy > supertuxkart > winetricks > wine_gecko > xfce4-places-plugin > > Also, I have orphaned plib which is required by simgear (maintained by > Sergey) > > Allan > I would adopt some of these packages if they really would get dropped to AUR. Could you please re-post a list of the packages that you move if noone adopts them in [community]? -- Malte Rabenseifner malte at zearan.de Germany -- Vor dem Wissen kommt das Verstehen. Vor dem Verstehen kommt das Sehen. Vor dem Sehen kommt das Erkennen. Vor dem Erkennen kommt das Wissen. Beneath knowing, understanding. Beneath understanding, seeing. Beneath seeing, recognizing. Beneath recognizing, knowing. -- From l.appelhans at gmx.de Thu Feb 11 11:24:50 2010 From: l.appelhans at gmx.de (Lukas Appelhans) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:24:50 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] shaman In-Reply-To: <4B742781.3000107@archlinux.org> References: <4B742515.3060806@archlinux.org> <4B742781.3000107@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <201002111724.50837.l.appelhans@gmx.de> No, 1.2.80 was never supposed to be a stable release, but got into kdemod-core by accident (well i really dunno why it got there :D). So better leave it for now at the version you have if it works... Shaman2 is definitely the version we're working on right now and which will most likely be the next release. Lukas Am Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010 16:51:29 schrieb Allan McRae: > On 12/02/10 01:42, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > >> Any TU want to continue maintaining aqpm+shaman in [community]? At > >> least aqpm needs updating and both need rebuilt for the latest > >> qt/polkit-qt. > >> > >> Shaman may need updating but the upstream versioning is strange so I > >> have > >> > >> no idea if that is a beta release or not... > > > > Aqpm2 and shaman2 is the actual ones, I don't know what to do with > > these ones at all ... > > Well, no... because they have not had a stable release yet. I am > talking about the update from 1.2.1 to 1.2.80. > > Allan From ted at tedpavlic.com Thu Feb 11 12:59:40 2010 From: ted at tedpavlic.com (Ted Pavlic) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:59:40 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Bug in perl-text-bibtext build script for x86_64 platform In-Reply-To: <4B73FB4E.9000802@gmx.net> References: <4B7068E1.4020008@tedpavlic.com> <4B726D95.2040203@gmx.net> <4B72F00B.9080200@tedpavlic.com> <4B7324A3.5080201@gmx.net> <4B73E1DB.7010304@t-online.de> <4B73FB4E.9000802@gmx.net> Message-ID: <4e0a90ed1002110959k3765c3ecs81869bf68f02c6dd@mail.gmail.com> >> aurup does not seem to work anymore. Try aurploader (from Xyne) or use the >> AUR webinterface for uploading. >> > > All right, thanks for that info! I can verify that 0.38-1 is now available on AUR. I can also verify that the new PKGBUILD seems to complete the build with no errors on my system! So that's excellent. Thanks -- Ted -- Ted Pavlic From arch-general at fukawi2.nl Thu Feb 11 17:21:45 2010 From: arch-general at fukawi2.nl (Phillip Smith) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:21:45 +1100 Subject: [aur-general] postgresql-client In-Reply-To: <8a2b1b591002101928u7adf3e72qedd5c156abfb8e8a@mail.gmail.com> References: <33be1b4c1002101923y5f22b327q2f543ca52f898bd6@mail.gmail.com> <8a2b1b591002101928u7adf3e72qedd5c156abfb8e8a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <33be1b4c1002111421o3d39da82n99064a52b4e31db@mail.gmail.com> On 11 February 2010 14:28, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Phillip Smith wrote: >> As per the below bug report, can my postgresql-client package be >> deleted from the AUR once this new package hits the repos please? :) >> >> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16495 >> > > It can, but the current package doesn't incorporate the client-only > install, just adds provides/conflicts. If others (ie the actual > maintainer) thinks it's a good idea to actually include that, then i > have no problem adding it. My bad -- I didn't pay close enough attention to the bug report :) Ignore me then, thanks for pointing that out Daniel. From xenoterracide at gmail.com Thu Feb 11 20:06:39 2010 From: xenoterracide at gmail.com (Caleb Cushing) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:06:39 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] plz orphan perl-uri-find Message-ID: <81bfc67a1002111706r41b01b8cya12b8085c6b9ad8a@mail.gmail.com> or contact the author... I was able to get a hold of him about a month ago... he said he'd lost his password to aur and couldn't find a reset. I suggested that he contact on here. seems he still owns the package and hasn't updated it so I assume he didn't do that (I'm just joining the list now). I'd say just orphaning it will work. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com From pierre at archlinux.de Thu Feb 11 20:12:17 2010 From: pierre at archlinux.de (Pierre Schmitz) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:12:17 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] [signoff] devtools 0.9.0 Message-ID: <201002120212.18030.pierre@archlinux.de> Hi TUs and DEVs, I just packaged a new set of devtools today. I'll put it into testing first; so please give it a try and let me know if there are any problems. And of course I'd appreciate if you could also drop a line if everything works as expected. A warning for those who use makechrootpkg: the rw and union subdirs are no longer used and cannot be used with the new tools. Aufs is no longer needed. For details see http://projects.archlinux.org/devtools.git/log/ The most noticeable changes are: Use the host's SRCDEST and PKGDEST if defined Reset umask before touching the chroot. make sure all files are owned by nobody before building Move build and package logs to WORKDIR, otherwise it is lost Create a working copy instead of using an union layer Read pacman cache dir from pacman.conf or cli Reduce verbosity to a sane minimum simplify and optimize upload process Replace expensive merge with delete and copy Add missing -n option to getopt list for mkarchroot abort if not all local source files are under version control Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre From allan at archlinux.org Thu Feb 11 20:46:03 2010 From: allan at archlinux.org (Allan McRae) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:46:03 +1000 Subject: [aur-general] shaman In-Reply-To: <4B742515.3060806@archlinux.org> References: <4B742515.3060806@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <4B74B2DB.30308@archlinux.org> On 12/02/10 01:41, Allan McRae wrote: > Any TU want to continue maintaining aqpm+shaman in [community]? At > least aqpm needs updating and both need rebuilt for the latest > qt/polkit-qt. Shaman may need updating but the upstream versioning is > strange so I have no idea if that is a beta release or not... > > I do not have anything Qt based on my system and do not feel motivated > to download it to continue maintaining this package myself. At the > moment it does not need kdelibs, but in the future this will become > mandatory. Again, a dependency I do not wish to download. > > If I have no response by tomorrow, I will move it to the AUR. In fact, looking into this further, shaman1 is no longer supported upstream and shaman2 has not had a stable release. So without furhter ado, I have dropped these to the AUR. Allan From snowmaniscool at gmail.com Fri Feb 12 00:23:50 2010 From: snowmaniscool at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9langer?=) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:23:50 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] [signoff] devtools 0.9.0 In-Reply-To: <201002120212.18030.pierre@archlinux.de> References: <201002120212.18030.pierre@archlinux.de> Message-ID: <7fcd249b1002112123t10984058k14e48a1c4ae2d035@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Hi TUs and DEVs, > > I just packaged a new set of devtools today. I'll put it into testing first; > so please give it a try and let me know if there are any problems. And of > course I'd appreciate if you could also drop a line if everything works as > expected. > > A warning for those who use makechrootpkg: the rw and union subdirs are no > longer used and cannot be used with the new tools. Aufs is no longer needed. > > For details see http://projects.archlinux.org/devtools.git/log/ > > The most noticeable changes are: > > ? ? ?Use the host's SRCDEST and PKGDEST if defined > ? ? ?Reset umask before touching the chroot. > ? ? ?make sure all files are owned by nobody before building > ? ? ?Move build and package logs to WORKDIR, otherwise it is lost > ? ? ?Create a working copy instead of using an union layer > ? ? ?Read pacman cache dir from pacman.conf or cli > ? ? ?Reduce verbosity to a sane minimum > ? ? ?simplify and optimize upload process > ? ? ?Replace expensive merge with delete and copy > ? ? ?Add missing -n option to getopt list for mkarchroot > ? ? ?abort if not all local source files are under version control > > Greetings, > > Pierre > > -- > > Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre > I'm getting this error: creating clean working copy mkdir: cannot create directory `': No such file or directory From snowmaniscool at gmail.com Fri Feb 12 00:42:32 2010 From: snowmaniscool at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9langer?=) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:42:32 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] [signoff] devtools 0.9.0 In-Reply-To: <7fcd249b1002112123t10984058k14e48a1c4ae2d035@mail.gmail.com> References: <201002120212.18030.pierre@archlinux.de> <7fcd249b1002112123t10984058k14e48a1c4ae2d035@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <7fcd249b1002112142o732d6c8ak484d1200b0c50f71@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Eric B?langer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: >> Hi TUs and DEVs, >> >> I just packaged a new set of devtools today. I'll put it into testing first; >> so please give it a try and let me know if there are any problems. And of >> course I'd appreciate if you could also drop a line if everything works as >> expected. >> >> A warning for those who use makechrootpkg: the rw and union subdirs are no >> longer used and cannot be used with the new tools. Aufs is no longer needed. >> >> For details see http://projects.archlinux.org/devtools.git/log/ >> >> The most noticeable changes are: >> >> ? ? ?Use the host's SRCDEST and PKGDEST if defined >> ? ? ?Reset umask before touching the chroot. >> ? ? ?make sure all files are owned by nobody before building >> ? ? ?Move build and package logs to WORKDIR, otherwise it is lost >> ? ? ?Create a working copy instead of using an union layer >> ? ? ?Read pacman cache dir from pacman.conf or cli >> ? ? ?Reduce verbosity to a sane minimum >> ? ? ?simplify and optimize upload process >> ? ? ?Replace expensive merge with delete and copy >> ? ? ?Add missing -n option to getopt list for mkarchroot >> ? ? ?abort if not all local source files are under version control >> >> Greetings, >> >> Pierre >> >> -- >> >> Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre >> > > I'm getting ?this error: > > creating clean working copy > mkdir: cannot create directory `': No such file or directory > Another thing: My CacheDir line in pacman.conf was commented out as I was using the default: /var/cache/pacman/pkg/. So when using makechrootpkg, it downloaded packages in the build directory. I am wondering if it wouldn't be better to give the cache_dir variable a default value of /var/cache/pacman/pkg/ From foutrelis at gmail.com Fri Feb 12 01:29:48 2010 From: foutrelis at gmail.com (Evangelos Foutras) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:29:48 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] plz orphan perl-uri-find In-Reply-To: <81bfc67a1002111706r41b01b8cya12b8085c6b9ad8a@mail.gmail.com> References: <81bfc67a1002111706r41b01b8cya12b8085c6b9ad8a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Caleb Cushing wrote: > or contact the author... I was able to get a hold of him about a month > ago... he said he'd lost his password to aur and couldn't find a > reset. I suggested that he contact on here. seems he still owns the > package and hasn't updated it so I assume he didn't do that (I'm just > joining the list now). I'd say just orphaning it will work. > > -- > Caleb Cushing > > http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com Done. From pierre at archlinux.de Fri Feb 12 04:16:01 2010 From: pierre at archlinux.de (Pierre Schmitz) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:16:01 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] [signoff] devtools 0.9.0 In-Reply-To: <7fcd249b1002112142o732d6c8ak484d1200b0c50f71@mail.gmail.com> References: <201002120212.18030.pierre@archlinux.de> <7fcd249b1002112123t10984058k14e48a1c4ae2d035@mail.gmail.com> <7fcd249b1002112142o732d6c8ak484d1200b0c50f71@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <201002121016.02420.pierre@archlinux.de> Am Freitag, 12. Februar 2010 06:42:32 schrieb Eric B?langer: > My CacheDir line in pacman.conf was commented out I missed that this var was optional. Fixed in http://projects.archlinux.org/devtools.git/commit/?id=9e14e8691d6b60d82ab553252a79cc5e61e2d40d I'll wait for some more feedback before releasing a new package. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre From pressh at gmail.com Fri Feb 12 04:45:43 2010 From: pressh at gmail.com (Ronald van Haren) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:45:43 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] decrease package workload in [community] In-Reply-To: <4B72B918.8040009@t-online.de> References: <9fcf70361002100249p6dee7cdeh724e0f4a6ea998cf@mail.gmail.com> <4B72B918.8040009@t-online.de> Message-ID: <9fcf70361002120145h74dffcb6kc2719f97c20c1b68@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote: > Am 10.02.2010 11:49, schrieb Ronald van Haren: >> >> Hi TUs, >> >> I'd like to drop some/most of my packages in [community] to some of >> you guys so I can focus more on packages in [core] and [extra], and >> maybe do some coding when I find time. >> >> For now I'll keep maintaining them as most of these belong in a binary >> repo (though some I don't mind dropping to unsupported), so let's see >> where this gets us. >> >> Just shoot or simply take something you're interested in. Some >> packages need to be taken as group, but that seems fairly obvious. >> >> Ronald >> > > Hello > > I can take qtoctave. > > Regards Stefan > thanks, that's at least one package. Some other takers or do you really need me to put the full list of packages here? Ronald From xyne at archlinux.ca Fri Feb 12 05:36:44 2010 From: xyne at archlinux.ca (Xyne) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:36:44 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] decrease package workload in [community] In-Reply-To: <9fcf70361002120145h74dffcb6kc2719f97c20c1b68@mail.gmail.com> References: <9fcf70361002100249p6dee7cdeh724e0f4a6ea998cf@mail.gmail.com> <4B72B918.8040009@t-online.de> <9fcf70361002120145h74dffcb6kc2719f97c20c1b68@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100212113644.5242f677@archlinux.ca> > thanks, that's at least one package. > > Some other takers or do you really need me to put the full list of > packages here? > > Ronald I've adopted asunder. Here's the list of your remaining [community] packages according to the dashboard: awesome beautiful-soup calcurse ccsm compiz-bcop compizconfig-backend-gconf compizconfig-backend-kconfig compizconfig-python compiz-core compiz-decorator-gtk compiz-decorator-kde compiz-fusion-plugins-extra compiz-fusion-plugins-main compiz-manager ecore-svn e_dbus-svn edje-svn eet-svn efreet-svn eina-svn embryo-svn emerald emerald-themes emesene e-modules-extra-svn emprint-svn engrave-svn entrance-svn esmart-svn e-svn evas-svn ewl-svn exml-svn extremetuxracer ffmpegthumbnailer flock freevo fusion-icon kaa-base kaa-imlib2 kaa-metadata libcompizconfig libev libxdg-basedir pyneighborhood python-pysqlite-legacy raw-thumbnailer sakura sqlite2 thunar-thumbnailers ttf-inconsolata From tom at wizetek.com Fri Feb 12 09:53:45 2010 From: tom at wizetek.com (Tom Wizetek) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:53:45 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: ID=32248 (firstclass 10.009-1) Message-ID: Please remove my AUR package 32248 (firstclass) Broken by libpng14.so.14.0.0. Binary only app distro model. No source available. Thanks. From pressh at gmail.com Fri Feb 12 10:54:58 2010 From: pressh at gmail.com (Ronald van Haren) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:54:58 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] [signoff] devtools 0.9.0 In-Reply-To: <201002121016.02420.pierre@archlinux.de> References: <201002120212.18030.pierre@archlinux.de> <7fcd249b1002112123t10984058k14e48a1c4ae2d035@mail.gmail.com> <7fcd249b1002112142o732d6c8ak484d1200b0c50f71@mail.gmail.com> <201002121016.02420.pierre@archlinux.de> Message-ID: <9fcf70361002120754y2470bfl5b3752e8709540e5@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am Freitag, 12. Februar 2010 06:42:32 schrieb Eric B?langer: >> My CacheDir line in pacman.conf was commented out > > I missed that this var was optional. Fixed in > http://projects.archlinux.org/devtools.git/commit/?id=9e14e8691d6b60d82ab553252a79cc5e61e2d40d > > I'll wait for some more feedback before releasing a new package. > > -- > > Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre > didn't notice any devtools-related problems on either of the architectures using a current git checkout. Ronald From x-demon at x-demon.org Fri Feb 12 11:02:18 2010 From: x-demon at x-demon.org (Lex Rivera) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:02:18 +0300 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: ID=32248 (firstclass 10.009-1) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100212160218.GA23616@lex-laptop> You can use libpng12 in AUR in deps. On 12/02/10 09:53, Tom Wizetek wrote: > Please remove my AUR package 32248 (firstclass) > Broken by libpng14.so.14.0.0. > Binary only app distro model. No source available. > Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From schivmeister at gmail.com Fri Feb 12 11:19:47 2010 From: schivmeister at gmail.com (Ray Rashif) Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:19:47 +0800 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: ID=32248 (firstclass 10.009-1) In-Reply-To: <20100212160218.GA23616@lex-laptop> References: <20100212160218.GA23616@lex-laptop> Message-ID: <291cdeab1002120819t1e37e6c3tc19b37f3b96d0ee4@mail.gmail.com> On 13 February 2010 00:02, Lex Rivera wrote: > You can use libpng12 in AUR in deps. > > On 12/02/10 09:53, Tom Wizetek wrote: >> Please remove my AUR package 32248 (firstclass) >> Broken by libpng14.so.14.0.0. >> Binary only app distro model. No source available. >> Thanks. It seems you'd uploaded a duplicate of http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18614 (fcc). Since that one was submitted earlier than yours, has a higher vote count and has been updated, firstclass will be deleted. If not, please verify otherwise and you can keep on maintaining it while depending on libpng12 (file a bug upstream even if it's non-free). -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD From snowmaniscool at gmail.com Fri Feb 12 18:18:30 2010 From: snowmaniscool at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9langer?=) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:18:30 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] [signoff] devtools 0.9.0 In-Reply-To: <7fcd249b1002112123t10984058k14e48a1c4ae2d035@mail.gmail.com> References: <201002120212.18030.pierre@archlinux.de> <7fcd249b1002112123t10984058k14e48a1c4ae2d035@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <7fcd249b1002121518j71dd0b0x500311b23aa9c944@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Eric B?langer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: >> Hi TUs and DEVs, >> >> I just packaged a new set of devtools today. I'll put it into testing first; >> so please give it a try and let me know if there are any problems. And of >> course I'd appreciate if you could also drop a line if everything works as >> expected. >> >> A warning for those who use makechrootpkg: the rw and union subdirs are no >> longer used and cannot be used with the new tools. Aufs is no longer needed. >> >> For details see http://projects.archlinux.org/devtools.git/log/ >> >> The most noticeable changes are: >> >> ? ? ?Use the host's SRCDEST and PKGDEST if defined >> ? ? ?Reset umask before touching the chroot. >> ? ? ?make sure all files are owned by nobody before building >> ? ? ?Move build and package logs to WORKDIR, otherwise it is lost >> ? ? ?Create a working copy instead of using an union layer >> ? ? ?Read pacman cache dir from pacman.conf or cli >> ? ? ?Reduce verbosity to a sane minimum >> ? ? ?simplify and optimize upload process >> ? ? ?Replace expensive merge with delete and copy >> ? ? ?Add missing -n option to getopt list for mkarchroot >> ? ? ?abort if not all local source files are under version control >> >> Greetings, >> >> Pierre >> >> -- >> >> Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre >> > > I'm getting ?this error: > > creating clean working copy > mkdir: cannot create directory `': No such file or directory > I found the cause of this error. This error happens when the CacheDir is undefined. The chroot_mount function in mkarchroot then fails to create the cache_dir directory. It should be fixed by the commit to give cache_dir a default value. From pierre at archlinux.de Fri Feb 12 22:10:16 2010 From: pierre at archlinux.de (Pierre Schmitz) Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 04:10:16 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] [signoff] devtools 0.9.1 In-Reply-To: <7fcd249b1002121518j71dd0b0x500311b23aa9c944@mail.gmail.com> References: <201002120212.18030.pierre@archlinux.de> <7fcd249b1002112123t10984058k14e48a1c4ae2d035@mail.gmail.com> <7fcd249b1002121518j71dd0b0x500311b23aa9c944@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <201002130410.16427.pierre@archlinux.de> Am Samstag, 13. Februar 2010 00:18:30 schrieb Eric B?langer: > I found the cause of this error. This error happens when the CacheDir > is undefined. The chroot_mount function in mkarchroot then fails to > create the cache_dir directory. It should be fixed by the commit to > give cache_dir a default value. Thanks, that explains a lot. I have put 0.9.1 into [testing] fixing this issue and being a little more verbose when an action might take longer (like svn commit) -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre From jussi.timperi at gmail.com Sat Feb 13 05:32:56 2010 From: jussi.timperi at gmail.com (Jussi Timperi) Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:32:56 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request for openoffice-sdk Message-ID: <1266057176.3970.944.camel@ZenArch> PKGBUILD openoffice-sdk [1] can now be removed from AUR because it's already available in extra repository. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13036 From biru.ionut at gmail.com Sat Feb 13 05:48:11 2010 From: biru.ionut at gmail.com (Ionut Biru) Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:48:11 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request for openoffice-sdk In-Reply-To: <1266057176.3970.944.camel@ZenArch> References: <1266057176.3970.944.camel@ZenArch> Message-ID: <4B76836B.1020502@gmail.com> On 02/13/2010 12:32 PM, Jussi Timperi wrote: > PKGBUILD openoffice-sdk [1] can now be removed from AUR because it's > already available in extra repository. > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13036 > done -- Ionut From nblock at archlinux.us Sat Feb 13 13:26:02 2010 From: nblock at archlinux.us (nblock) Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:26:02 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] removal request: neo-layout-svn Message-ID: <201002131926.03351.nblock@archlinux.us> Hello, neo-layout-svn [1] is deprecated. It has been replaced by xkeyboard-config- neo-svn. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25484 thanks, -- nblock From atsutane at freethoughts.de Sat Feb 13 13:45:39 2010 From: atsutane at freethoughts.de (Thorsten =?ISO-8859-1?B?VPZwcGVy?=) Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:45:39 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] removal request: neo-layout-svn In-Reply-To: <201002131926.03351.nblock@archlinux.us> References: <201002131926.03351.nblock@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <20100213194539.32b959ad@hell> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224 On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:26:02 +0100 nblock wrote: > Hello, > neo-layout-svn [1] is deprecated. It has been replaced by > xkeyboard-config- neo-svn. > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25484 > > thanks, Done, thank you. - -- Jabber: atsutane at freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iFYEARELAAYFAkt281MACgkQOeTxfyla+/SbpADgu26xpxbaCwK9EZCAhsQCxVJk tqCwiv+DY1XJ4gDfbr0sGiGq3FWBbQJHaJnorklnMti6aosD4vketA== =ou4U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From doorknob60 at gmail.com Sat Feb 13 17:42:32 2010 From: doorknob60 at gmail.com (doorknob60) Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 14:42:32 -0800 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: fofix Message-ID: <3421694f1002131442x34192fc3m90fa1b1a85c091e3@mail.gmail.com> Someone made a package called fofix because my package (fretsonfire-alarian-mod) was out of date. I incorporated the changes into my package and he has now orphaned fofix, so it's no longer needed. From foutrelis at gmail.com Sat Feb 13 17:47:46 2010 From: foutrelis at gmail.com (Evangelos Foutras) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 00:47:46 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: fofix In-Reply-To: <3421694f1002131442x34192fc3m90fa1b1a85c091e3@mail.gmail.com> References: <3421694f1002131442x34192fc3m90fa1b1a85c091e3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:42 AM, doorknob60 wrote: > Someone made a package called fofix because my package > (fretsonfire-alarian-mod) was out of date. I incorporated the changes into > my package and he has now orphaned fofix, so it's no longer needed. Gone. :) From andrea at archlinux.org Sat Feb 13 17:47:53 2010 From: andrea at archlinux.org (Andrea Scarpino) Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 23:47:53 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: fofix In-Reply-To: <3421694f1002131442x34192fc3m90fa1b1a85c091e3@mail.gmail.com> References: <3421694f1002131442x34192fc3m90fa1b1a85c091e3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <201002132347.54022.andrea@archlinux.org> On Saturday 13 February 2010 23:42:32 doorknob60 wrote: > Someone made a package called fofix because my package > (fretsonfire-alarian-mod) was out of date. I incorporated the changes into > my package and he has now orphaned fofix, so it's no longer needed. Why you do not keep the upstream name? -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer From pierre at archlinux.de Sun Feb 14 06:15:12 2010 From: pierre at archlinux.de (Pierre Schmitz) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:15:12 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] [signoff] devtools 0.9.2 In-Reply-To: <201002120212.18030.pierre@archlinux.de> References: <201002120212.18030.pierre@archlinux.de> Message-ID: <201002141215.12705.pierre@archlinux.de> Am Freitag, 12. Februar 2010 02:12:17 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > A warning for those who use makechrootpkg: the rw and union subdirs are no > longer used and cannot be used with the new tools. Aufs is no longer > needed. > > For details see http://projects.archlinux.org/devtools.git/log/ The new devtools will soon be in extra. You'll find a chagnelog at the url mentioned above. I just wanted to add some more info about the new rsync usage of makechrootpkg: * if you have any important files in your rw layer it is easier to back them up now using the old devtools. * You can remove the rw and union dirs; they are no longer used * In a worst case you will need up to 800 MB extra disk space for your chroot, as we now create a complete copy of your root install. The benefit is that there wont be any crashes or system freezes due to aufs and compiling will be faster as there is no overhead anymore. The initial sync will take some time though; depending on your hard drive performance. (e.g. one minute) -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre From matias at archlinux-br.org Sun Feb 14 09:05:29 2010 From: matias at archlinux-br.org (Paulo Matias) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:05:29 -0200 Subject: [aur-general] Maintainer for virtualbox_bin still wanted Message-ID: Hi, Nobody has still adopted the virtualbox_bin package in AUR since my resignation, when I said I was looking for the next maintainer for this package. Does any TU has interest in maintaing this package? You already know, this is one of the most voted packages in AUR, but can't go to community due to licensing (redistribution) restrictions. If any TU wants to maintain it, please just take it from me until tomorrow. If nobody adopts it until tomorrow, I will look for a non-TU maintainer. Best regards, Paulo Matias From pupykin.s at gmail.com Sun Feb 14 11:02:11 2010 From: pupykin.s at gmail.com (Sergej Pupykin) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:02:11 +0300 Subject: [aur-general] [arch-notifications] Orphan Extra package [rosegarden] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <4B780D87.6020704@gmail.com> References: <20100214142242.5577.25084@gudrun.archlinux.org> <4B780D87.6020704@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B781E83.9000706@gmail.com> On 14.02.2010 17:22, Arch Website Notification wrote: >> * Note: this is an automated message >> >> ps at lx-ltd.ru wants to notify you that the following package may be out >> of date: >> >> Package Name: rosegarden >> Architecture: i686 >> Repository: Extra >> (http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/rosegarden/) >> >> >> The user provided the following additional text: >> >> 10.02 released >> >> http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/rosegarden/rosegarden/10.02/rosegarden-10.02.tar.bz2 >> >> >> Hi, updated PKGBUILD attached -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: PKGBUILD URL: From giovanni at archlinux.org Sun Feb 14 11:09:52 2010 From: giovanni at archlinux.org (Giovanni Scafora) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:09:52 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] [arch-notifications] Orphan Extra package [rosegarden] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <4B781E83.9000706@gmail.com> References: <20100214142242.5577.25084@gudrun.archlinux.org> <4B780D87.6020704@gmail.com> <4B781E83.9000706@gmail.com> Message-ID: 2010/2/14, Sergej Pupykin : > updated PKGBUILD attached I'm working on it just now. -- Arch Linux Developer http://www.archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.it From jaredcasper at gmail.com Sun Feb 14 22:03:12 2010 From: jaredcasper at gmail.com (Jared Casper) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:03:12 -0800 Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request Message-ID: Please delete geda-libs and geda-suite from AUR. These were replaced with geda-gaf when they released 1.6.0 upstream, which combined everything into one tarball. It's now on 1.6.1 so probably time to delete the old packages. :) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7481 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7482 Jared Casper From doorknob60 at gmail.com Sun Feb 14 23:58:34 2010 From: doorknob60 at gmail.com (doorknob60) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:58:34 -0800 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: fofix In-Reply-To: <201002132347.54022.andrea@archlinux.org> References: <3421694f1002131442x34192fc3m90fa1b1a85c091e3@mail.gmail.com> <201002132347.54022.andrea@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <3421694f1002142058o691f70bcsddfbea429a53b3cf@mail.gmail.com> Since lots of people and the arch-games repo already use the old name, and removing the package might throw people off, I dunno really. Also AUR votes. Don't think it matters too much since searching fofix from the AUR search or yaourt brings up fretsonfire-alarian-mod. On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > On Saturday 13 February 2010 23:42:32 doorknob60 wrote: > > Someone made a package called fofix because my package > > (fretsonfire-alarian-mod) was out of date. I incorporated the changes > into > > my package and he has now orphaned fofix, so it's no longer needed. > Why you do not keep the upstream name? > > -- > Andrea `bash` Scarpino > Arch Linux Developer > From daenyth+arch at gmail.com Mon Feb 15 00:27:53 2010 From: daenyth+arch at gmail.com (Daenyth Blank) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:27:53 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: fofix In-Reply-To: <3421694f1002142058o691f70bcsddfbea429a53b3cf@mail.gmail.com> References: <3421694f1002131442x34192fc3m90fa1b1a85c091e3@mail.gmail.com> <201002132347.54022.andrea@archlinux.org> <3421694f1002142058o691f70bcsddfbea429a53b3cf@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 23:58, doorknob60 wrote: > Since lots of people and the arch-games repo already use the old name, and > removing the package might throw people off, I dunno really. Also AUR votes. > Don't think it matters too much since searching fofix from the AUR search or > yaourt brings up fretsonfire-alarian-mod. We could just as easily use $provides next time. Also don't top post. From schivmeister at gmail.com Mon Feb 15 02:11:42 2010 From: schivmeister at gmail.com (Ray Rashif) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:11:42 -0800 Subject: [aur-general] Maintainer for virtualbox_bin still wanted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <291cdeab1002142311l41598599v2804653ac85d7882@mail.gmail.com> I'd take it since I use it. But I'm not comfortable adopting as no other TU has done so yet (not even yourself), even when there are over 2000 votes. If you say the license isn't too problematic, then all's well. On 14/02/2010, Paulo Matias wrote: > Hi, > > Nobody has still adopted the virtualbox_bin package in AUR since my > resignation, when I said I was looking for the next maintainer for > this package. > > Does any TU has interest in maintaing this package? You already know, > this is one of the most voted packages in AUR, but can't go to > community due to licensing (redistribution) restrictions. > > If any TU wants to maintain it, please just take it from me until > tomorrow. If nobody adopts it until tomorrow, I will look for a non-TU > maintainer. > > Best regards, > > Paulo Matias > -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD From schivmeister at gmail.com Mon Feb 15 02:40:56 2010 From: schivmeister at gmail.com (Ray Rashif) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:40:56 -0800 Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <291cdeab1002142340g9999292nd3f10e851101bb14@mail.gmail.com> On 14/02/2010, Jared Casper wrote: > Please delete geda-libs and geda-suite from AUR. These were replaced > with geda-gaf when they released 1.6.0 upstream, which combined > everything into one tarball. It's now on 1.6.1 so probably time to > delete the old packages. :) > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7481 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7482 > > Jared Casper > Done. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD From panosfilip at gmail.com Mon Feb 15 10:08:57 2010 From: panosfilip at gmail.com (Panos Filip) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:08:57 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] [Proposal] Cleaning up some Virtualbox packages on AUR In-Reply-To: <1f0667801002061714o26bab175y7b97a776531d22ac@mail.gmail.com> References: <1f0667801002061714o26bab175y7b97a776531d22ac@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1f0667801002150708j31d60873q8e2a864904787e@mail.gmail.com> On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Panos Filip wrote: > Hello to everyone :) > > There seem to some Virtualbox ( or virtualbox related) packages we don't > really need: > > *1) aur/dkms-virtualbox 1.5.0-1 (Out of Date) (4) * > > *What is that exactly ?* > > *2) aur/vboxapi 3.1.2-1 (1)* > SDK for VirtualBox (Personal Use Binaries Edition) > > *That one as well ?* > > *3)aur/virtualbox_bin-1 1.6.6-1 (18)* > Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) > *4)aur/virtualbox_bin-2 2.2.4-1 (24)* > Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) > > *3 and 4 --> do some people really need older and unsupported (with less > features or buggier) releases for Virtualbox ?* > > > *5) aur/virtualbox_bin-3_0 3.0.12-1 (18)* > Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) > > *What about that ? --> Like 3 and 4, but different PKGBUILD for version > 3.0 and different for 3.1 ?* > > *6)aur/virtualbox_bin 3.1.2-2 [installed] (2101)* > Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) > > *We do want this one, it's OK* > > *7)aur/virtualbox_bin_beta 3.0.0_BETA2-1 (Out of Date) (37)* > Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) > > *OK, check this one ...hmm* > > > *8)aur/virtualbox_bin_unstable 3.1.4_BETA2-1 (0)* > Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) > > *We have one beta and one unstable (a.k.a beta) ? * > > *9)aur/virtualbox-legacy_bin 1.5.6-5 (4)* > Powerful x86 virtualization - binary version (non GPL - free for > personal use and evaluation) > > *Another one like 3 , 4 and 5 !* > > *10)aur/virtualbox-sun 3.1.2.56127-6 (45)* > A general-purpose full virtualizer for x86 hardware (Binary Edition, > Personal Use) > > *What's the difference with 6 ? * > > Regards, > > Panos Filip > Bumping the thread, since we do need some cleaning up, IMHO. From biru.ionut at gmail.com Mon Feb 15 11:25:40 2010 From: biru.ionut at gmail.com (Ionut Biru) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:25:40 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] [Proposal] Cleaning up some Virtualbox packages on AUR In-Reply-To: <1f0667801002150708j31d60873q8e2a864904787e@mail.gmail.com> References: <1f0667801002061714o26bab175y7b97a776531d22ac@mail.gmail.com> <1f0667801002150708j31d60873q8e2a864904787e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B797584.60303@gmail.com> On 02/15/2010 05:08 PM, Panos Filip wrote: > On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Panos Filip wrote: > >> Hello to everyone :) >> >> There seem to some Virtualbox ( or virtualbox related) packages we don't >> really need: >> >> *1) aur/dkms-virtualbox 1.5.0-1 (Out of Date) (4) * >> >> *What is that exactly ?* >> >> *2) aur/vboxapi 3.1.2-1 (1)* >> SDK for VirtualBox (Personal Use Binaries Edition) >> >> *That one as well ?* >> >> *3)aur/virtualbox_bin-1 1.6.6-1 (18)* >> Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) >> *4)aur/virtualbox_bin-2 2.2.4-1 (24)* >> Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) >> >> *3 and 4 --> do some people really need older and unsupported (with less >> features or buggier) releases for Virtualbox ?* >> >> >> *5) aur/virtualbox_bin-3_0 3.0.12-1 (18)* >> Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) >> >> *What about that ? --> Like 3 and 4, but different PKGBUILD for version >> 3.0 and different for 3.1 ?* >> >> *6)aur/virtualbox_bin 3.1.2-2 [installed] (2101)* >> Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) >> >> *We do want this one, it's OK* >> >> *7)aur/virtualbox_bin_beta 3.0.0_BETA2-1 (Out of Date) (37)* >> Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) >> >> *OK, check this one ...hmm* >> >> >> *8)aur/virtualbox_bin_unstable 3.1.4_BETA2-1 (0)* >> Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) >> >> *We have one beta and one unstable (a.k.a beta) ? * >> >> *9)aur/virtualbox-legacy_bin 1.5.6-5 (4)* >> Powerful x86 virtualization - binary version (non GPL - free for >> personal use and evaluation) >> >> *Another one like 3 , 4 and 5 !* >> >> *10)aur/virtualbox-sun 3.1.2.56127-6 (45)* >> A general-purpose full virtualizer for x86 hardware (Binary Edition, >> Personal Use) >> >> *What's the difference with 6 ? * >> >> Regards, >> >> Panos Filip >> > > Bumping the thread, since we do need some cleaning up, IMHO. i've deleted unstable build some time ago but the other: virtualbox_bin-3_0 should stay at 3.0.x version but who did updated didn't understand this thing. virtualbox_bin should follow the latest version of virtualbox virtualbox_bin_beta should follow only beta but same as first, the current maintainer didn't get it. virtualbox-sun is basically _bin and changes should merge to _bin and then we can delete it. i could delete the older ones if the modules doesn't compile anymore but i think we should let them there and try to fix the builds above. The one that are out of date should be updated or somebody should claim them. -- Ionut From dbb.arch at liqd.org Mon Feb 15 11:29:07 2010 From: dbb.arch at liqd.org (Dwayne Bent) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:29:07 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request Message-ID: <4B797653.8090302@liqd.org> Can someone please remove the following packages from the AUR: lighttpd-sni no longer needed as the new version of lighttpd includes the patch. lua-zlib it was re-uploaded as lua-zlib-git, since it's actually a git package since no source releases are available. Thanks. -- Dwayne Bent From atsutane at freethoughts.de Mon Feb 15 11:37:49 2010 From: atsutane at freethoughts.de (Thorsten =?ISO-8859-1?B?VPZwcGVy?=) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:37:49 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request In-Reply-To: <4B797653.8090302@liqd.org> References: <4B797653.8090302@liqd.org> Message-ID: <20100215173749.2bc77839@hell> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224 On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:29:07 -0500 Dwayne Bent wrote: > Can someone please remove the following packages from the AUR: > > lighttpd-sni > no longer needed as the new version of lighttpd includes the > patch. > > lua-zlib > it was re-uploaded as lua-zlib-git, since it's actually a git > package since no source releases are available. > > Thanks. > Done, thank you. - -- Jabber: atsutane at freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iFYEARELAAYFAkt5eF0ACgkQOeTxfyla+/TnhQDg7WKrRreTAs6R9Vx/ipJUPEra WV2SQyEzAJ+JrwDgjESUliomox3ya8uddtGI8WFmDMJ/vWPd0RYJyQ== =vc8T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From xenoterracide at gmail.com Mon Feb 15 12:46:06 2010 From: xenoterracide at gmail.com (Caleb Cushing) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:46:06 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] mass orphan aCiD2's packages Message-ID: <81bfc67a1002150946x2bfa9b57oc79314e0a997adee@mail.gmail.com> I don't know if it's possible... but aCiD2 left the arch community a while ago... is it possible to mass orphan his packages? or transfer them? I've picked up a good share already. At the time we were just going do them as they needed to be updated. if it's not possible mass do it, should I just request them here as needed? -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com From biru.ionut at gmail.com Mon Feb 15 12:55:25 2010 From: biru.ionut at gmail.com (Ionut Biru) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:55:25 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] mass orphan aCiD2's packages In-Reply-To: <81bfc67a1002150946x2bfa9b57oc79314e0a997adee@mail.gmail.com> References: <81bfc67a1002150946x2bfa9b57oc79314e0a997adee@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B798A8D.2030102@gmail.com> On 02/15/2010 07:46 PM, Caleb Cushing wrote: > I don't know if it's possible... but aCiD2 left the arch community a > while ago... is it possible to mass orphan his packages? or transfer > them? I've picked up a good share already. At the time we were just > going do them as they needed to be updated. if it's not possible mass > do it, should I just request them here as needed? > i think is better to ask for orphan just packages that you want to update/maintain rather than orphan all his packages. -- Ionut From abaumann at yahoo.com Mon Feb 15 13:10:09 2010 From: abaumann at yahoo.com (Andreas Baumann) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:10:09 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request - sqlitexx-svn In-Reply-To: <20100215173749.2bc77839@hell> References: <4B797653.8090302@liqd.org> <20100215173749.2bc77839@hell> Message-ID: <20100215181009.GA4033@europa4.lan> Hi TUs, I would like to delete 'sqlitexx-svn' (building from the sourceforge repo). I switched to github and will create a 'sqlitexx-git'.. Thank in advance Andreas Baumann -- Andreas Baumann Trottenstrasse 20 CH-8037 Zuerich Telefon: +41(0)76/373 01 29 E-mail: abaumann at yahoo.com Homepage: www.andreasbaumann.cc From foutrelis at gmail.com Mon Feb 15 13:14:17 2010 From: foutrelis at gmail.com (Evangelos Foutras) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:14:17 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request - sqlitexx-svn In-Reply-To: <20100215181009.GA4033@europa4.lan> References: <4B797653.8090302@liqd.org> <20100215173749.2bc77839@hell> <20100215181009.GA4033@europa4.lan> Message-ID: <4B798EF9.7000203@gmail.com> On 15/02/2010 08:10 ??, Andreas Baumann wrote: > Hi TUs, > > I would like to delete 'sqlitexx-svn' (building from the sourceforge repo). > I switched to github and will create a 'sqlitexx-git'.. > > Thank in advance > > Andreas Baumann Deleted. From nblock at archlinux.us Mon Feb 15 17:00:37 2010 From: nblock at archlinux.us (Florian Preinstorfer) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:00:37 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] orphaned vim colorscheme PKGBUILD files Message-ID: <201002152300.38616.nblock@archlinux.us> Hi, i searched the AUR and found a lot of vim colorscheme PKGBUILD files that were orphaned by their maintainers and are part of either vim-colorschemes (AUR), vim-colorsamplerpack (extra) or both. I suggest to delete this packages to keep the AUR clean. part of vim-colorschemes and orphaned: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27964 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28397 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27942 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27941 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27789 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27946 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27792 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28446 part of vim-colorsamplerpack and orphaned: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28250 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27845 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27841 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27929 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27934 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27924 part of both and orphaned: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28391 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28393 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28396 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28451 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28403 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28464 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28466 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27986 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27953 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28408 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28257 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27956 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27958 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28380 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27940 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28239 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28253 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28441 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28382 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27788 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28258 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27983 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28389 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27947 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28461 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28444 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27970 greetings, Florian -- nblock From chrdr at gmx.at Mon Feb 15 17:31:09 2010 From: chrdr at gmx.at (Christoph) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:31:09 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Deletion Request Message-ID: <201002152331.25007.chrdr@gmx.at> Please delete the packages ttf-adf: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24551 and otf-adf: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34665 The first package (ttf-adf) is outdated, no activity for 11 months. I wrote an e-mail to the maintainer because I asked him to update or orphan the package, but he has not responded for four weeks. I wanted to adopt the package, but meanwhile I think that the package should be renamed. I first thought that otf-adf would be an adequate name, but now I think that there should be the following three packages: adffonts-otf - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34669 adffonts-ttf - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34671 adffonts-type1 - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34672 because *all* of the fonts are published as otf-fonts, a part of them additionally as ttf, and another part of them additionally as type1. Thanks in advance. Christoph From stefan-husmann at t-online.de Mon Feb 15 17:46:15 2010 From: stefan-husmann at t-online.de (Stefan Husmann) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:46:15 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] orphaned vim colorscheme PKGBUILD files In-Reply-To: <201002152300.38616.nblock@archlinux.us> References: <201002152300.38616.nblock@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <4B79CEB7.70100@t-online.de> Am 15.02.2010 23:00, schrieb Florian Preinstorfer: > Hi, > i searched the AUR and found a lot of vim colorscheme PKGBUILD files that were > orphaned by their maintainers and are part of either vim-colorschemes (AUR), > vim-colorsamplerpack (extra) or both. > > I suggest to delete this packages to keep the AUR clean. > ... > > greetings, > Florian Thank you, Florian, for your lists. I am no vim user and so I do not know what vim users would prefer: having one or two collections of themes (of which they use only few), or having many packages, all providing exactly one theme. I would say, packages with bundles of themes are better. I took a look at some of the packages and did not see a conflicts line against the bundles, so many are broken in that respect anyway. Thoughts? Regards Stefan From schivmeister at gmail.com Mon Feb 15 18:19:32 2010 From: schivmeister at gmail.com (Ray Rashif) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:19:32 +0800 Subject: [aur-general] Deletion Request In-Reply-To: <201002152331.25007.chrdr@gmx.at> References: <201002152331.25007.chrdr@gmx.at> Message-ID: <291cdeab1002151519md676acdse8894351108d6906@mail.gmail.com> On 16/02/2010, Christoph wrote: > Please delete the packages ttf-adf: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24551 > and otf-adf: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34665 > > The first package (ttf-adf) is outdated, no activity for 11 months. I wrote > an > e-mail to the maintainer because I asked him to update or orphan the > package, > but he has not responded for four weeks. > > I wanted to adopt the package, but meanwhile I think that the package should > be renamed. I first thought that otf-adf would be an adequate name, but now > I > think that there should be the following three packages: > adffonts-otf - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34669 > adffonts-ttf - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34671 > adffonts-type1 - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34672 > > because *all* of the fonts are published as otf-fonts, a part of them > additionally as ttf, and another part of them additionally as type1. The naming standard we've used has been ttf-foo, so naturally you should try to follow that. All three can be parts of the group "adf-fonts": ttf-adf otf-adf type1-adf -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD From schivmeister at gmail.com Mon Feb 15 18:38:30 2010 From: schivmeister at gmail.com (Ray Rashif) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:38:30 +0800 Subject: [aur-general] orphaned vim colorscheme PKGBUILD files In-Reply-To: <201002152300.38616.nblock@archlinux.us> References: <201002152300.38616.nblock@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <291cdeab1002151538j49cb3df4u2197203472518801@mail.gmail.com> On 16/02/2010, Florian Preinstorfer wrote: > Hi, > i searched the AUR and found a lot of vim colorscheme PKGBUILD files that > were > orphaned by their maintainers and are part of either vim-colorschemes (AUR), > vim-colorsamplerpack (extra) or both. > > I suggest to delete this packages to keep the AUR clean. > > part of vim-colorschemes and orphaned: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27964 > ... > part of vim-colorsamplerpack and orphaned: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28250 > ... > part of both and orphaned: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28391 > ... Technically, none of them conflict with the [extra] package because the official files are distributed across the vim72 and vimfiles dirs, whereas these place theirs directly to /usr/share/vim/foo/. To me, it's a little bit of an overkill to have a package for one file (excluding the license) when all of them are provided for by an official package, so I would delete these if you were to ask for opinions. But if most of them are under Laszlo, then he is (was?) an active pacman enthusiast and twice a TU applicant. So he might still be around to share his thoughts on this. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD From schivmeister at gmail.com Mon Feb 15 18:41:14 2010 From: schivmeister at gmail.com (Ray Rashif) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:41:14 +0800 Subject: [aur-general] orphaned vim colorscheme PKGBUILD files In-Reply-To: <291cdeab1002151538j49cb3df4u2197203472518801@mail.gmail.com> References: <201002152300.38616.nblock@archlinux.us> <291cdeab1002151538j49cb3df4u2197203472518801@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <291cdeab1002151541i18f2ae95uc3643c17f2389e71@mail.gmail.com> On 16/02/2010, Ray Rashif wrote: > But if most of them are under Laszlo, then he is (was?) an active > pacman enthusiast and twice a TU applicant. So he might still be > around to share his thoughts on this. Arghh sorry..I missed the word "orphaned" :) Yeah, I'd delete these then. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD From ghost1227 at archlinux.us Mon Feb 15 19:04:15 2010 From: ghost1227 at archlinux.us (Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:04:15 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] orphaned vim colorscheme PKGBUILD files In-Reply-To: <291cdeab1002151541i18f2ae95uc3643c17f2389e71@mail.gmail.com> References: <201002152300.38616.nblock@archlinux.us> <291cdeab1002151538j49cb3df4u2197203472518801@mail.gmail.com> <291cdeab1002151541i18f2ae95uc3643c17f2389e71@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <8a2b1b591002151604i46de3465j879d80b6af7b1a8f@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: > On 16/02/2010, Ray Rashif wrote: >> But if most of them are under Laszlo, then he is (was?) an active >> pacman enthusiast and twice a TU applicant. So he might still be >> around to share his thoughts on this. > > Arghh sorry..I missed the word "orphaned" :) > > Yeah, I'd delete these then. > > > -- > GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD > Agreed and done From jt512 at jt512.dyndns.org Mon Feb 15 19:06:40 2010 From: jt512 at jt512.dyndns.org (jt512 at jt512.dyndns.org) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:06:40 -0800 Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request: sc-ubuntu Message-ID: <20100216000639.GD25081@jt512.gateway.2wire.net> Please delete my package "sc-ubunutu". It duplicates existing package "sc". Sorry for the inconvenience. From atsutane at freethoughts.de Mon Feb 15 19:14:36 2010 From: atsutane at freethoughts.de (Thorsten =?ISO-8859-1?B?VPZwcGVy?=) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 01:14:36 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request: sc-ubuntu In-Reply-To: <20100216000639.GD25081@jt512.gateway.2wire.net> References: <20100216000639.GD25081@jt512.gateway.2wire.net> Message-ID: <20100216011436.1fa04bf9@hell> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224 On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:06:40 -0800 jt512 at jt512.dyndns.org wrote: > Please delete my package "sc-ubunutu". It duplicates existing package > "sc". > > Sorry for the inconvenience. Done, please provide a link with future requests. - -- Jabber: atsutane at freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iFYEARELAAYFAkt542wACgkQOeTxfyla+/QYegDgyIKQtDGLPw39lcwR5KV0iiQ7 XlfPKXs3zsoGkADgt+4CDKEyVsBOq92cS3zLoxKSvTn6qzh+s4gPgg== =OxoU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From tom at wizetek.com Mon Feb 15 20:07:16 2010 From: tom at wizetek.com (Tom Wizetek) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:07:16 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: ID=32248 (firstclass 10.009-1) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Please go ahead and remove the package. It is indeed a duplicate and apparently upstream will not be releasing any more Linux binaries in the foreseeable future. From x-demon at x-demon.org Tue Feb 16 02:02:02 2010 From: x-demon at x-demon.org (Lex Rivera) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:02:02 +0300 Subject: [aur-general] orphaned vim colorscheme PKGBUILD files In-Reply-To: <4B79CEB7.70100@t-online.de> References: <201002152300.38616.nblock@archlinux.us> <4B79CEB7.70100@t-online.de> Message-ID: <20100216070202.GA13148@lex-laptop> Vim users use colorschemes in ~/.vim/colors :) On 15/02/10 23:46, Stefan Husmann wrote: > Am 15.02.2010 23:00, schrieb Florian Preinstorfer: > >Hi, > >i searched the AUR and found a lot of vim colorscheme PKGBUILD files that were > >orphaned by their maintainers and are part of either vim-colorschemes (AUR), > >vim-colorsamplerpack (extra) or both. > > > >I suggest to delete this packages to keep the AUR clean. > > > > ... > > > >greetings, > >Florian > > Thank you, Florian, for your lists. > > I am no vim user and so I do not know what vim users would prefer: having one > or two collections of themes (of which they use only few), or having many packages, > all providing exactly one theme. I would say, packages with bundles of themes > are better. > > I took a look at some of the packages and did not see a conflicts line against > the bundles, so many are broken in that respect anyway. > > Thoughts? > > Regards Stefan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From chrdr at gmx.at Tue Feb 16 03:17:23 2010 From: chrdr at gmx.at (Christoph) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:17:23 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Deletion Request In-Reply-To: <291cdeab1002151519md676acdse8894351108d6906@mail.gmail.com> References: <201002152331.25007.chrdr@gmx.at> <291cdeab1002151519md676acdse8894351108d6906@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <201002160917.38942.chrdr@gmx.at> > The naming standard we've used has been ttf-foo, so naturally you > should try to follow that. All three can be parts of the group > "adf-fonts": > > ttf-adf > otf-adf > type1-adf That's the way I wanted to go first, too, but then I saw that there is not any package named type1-xxx, but there is a package xorg-fonts-type1 and another one called ttf-indic-otf in the extra repository, so I thought appendig the type might be the better choice. Anyway, if somebody who is part of the TU-Olympus tells me to take a different way, naturally I will follow ;-) In this case please orphan: otf-adf - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24551 (for the reasons already described in my first request) and remove the packages: adffonts-otf - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34669 adffonts-ttf - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34671 adffonts-type1 - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34672 I will then adopt otf-adf and then upload new pkgbuilds for otf-adf ttf-adf type1-adf all then belonging to the group adf-fonts Okay? Thanks, Christoph > > > -- > GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD From pressh at gmail.com Tue Feb 16 11:00:35 2010 From: pressh at gmail.com (Ronald van Haren) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:00:35 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <4B6F8CBC.1020707@archlinux.us> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> <4B6C75F0.1010402@t-online.de> <4B6F8CBC.1020707@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <9fcf70361002160800t5df14d2cy1b4f748adcee370@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) wrote: > ? ?gdal (out of date) updated as it needed a rebuild for netcdf 4.1-1. I did not adopt it though. > ? ?opendx > ? ? ? ?Depends: imagemagick,lesstif,netcdf > ? ? ? ?Required by: none broken by the netcdf 4.1-1 update. Doesn't build as it did use klibc which is now deprecated. Unless someone wants to fix this we should remove this one from the repos. Ronald From ranguvar at archlinux.us Tue Feb 16 11:46:06 2010 From: ranguvar at archlinux.us (Ranguvar) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:46:06 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: ID=32248 (firstclass 10.009-1) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <289e994d1002160846h2d244efeob749ac8ad93da1d7@mail.gmail.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 20:07, Tom Wizetek wrote: > Please go ahead and remove the package. > It is indeed a duplicate and apparently upstream will not be releasing > any more Linux binaries in the foreseeable future. Deleted, thank you. Please provide a link to the package in the future. -- Ranguvar [Devin Cofer] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJLesu4AAoJEHdXKOHe3MUTqOkQAIl3ocdENKClgrypwFqPe3Xf MfkDSlwGQkD/Sx2H104GGBNF0RR/eMDZoE0j8TJn+hgaC8cbm2Kj4l2PFf9mDvqe gDUaWTLQtrR6KBS9BeDyu2/sttpbjQ11op6SsLbasreBokhEvcDEcUc4fjO6DrJ6 F0EJvmwWlydJWL9/IR6HZBB/SDtdjoE/LDRqlNUtIBtxUM81MnJjmtz1oQLYfQ5b pHDizpqwFoWiN9JIPQs6wLFWAaNHpFzhc/3ayao+xra5zH5+KDdiilwre7chd/If E3hVPFXj3r3mY30uxVbxWMMFpqVSwQTHf7/IO9Ar3F2k9Dt02oBtESPD1EUCUm1w hhhA12x2u7g5rjrX1mD5uq11JruJf8vtvir0Qxpyl7Fa5f2bA1o0kF1LwRyaqj4n qVrzJqvU5E7HJtZnBGp0ZQGWc3jmcpgyVBILVI2CcItm9LLbj2nE7RDbkok/iGGh 0reHZFTpQPbLoDBJNtDibySKIiUvQ44fl2sOTB4NEK9B0hVIpqxF3SqQDhDQbk/2 jKjgxatve60pswuhjdL8cTZvaAfXKc3Kny4IWAgXSNy6/Gn22FeAQxWDyOAhRHC4 nwCSSbwvrLK6szTQPzpsvkvMeRoCaivqYczSP5KHn6V9hfft4DnDjGoL6fGYw2Ch rcflwXJ9gB3GQ7/vQf5y =T5/P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From ghost1227 at archlinux.us Tue Feb 16 12:03:08 2010 From: ghost1227 at archlinux.us (Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:03:08 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <9fcf70361002160800t5df14d2cy1b4f748adcee370@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> <4B6C75F0.1010402@t-online.de> <4B6F8CBC.1020707@archlinux.us> <9fcf70361002160800t5df14d2cy1b4f748adcee370@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B7ACFCC.9050000@archlinux.us> On 02/16/2010 10:00 AM, Ronald van Haren wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) > wrote: > >> gdal (out of date) >> > updated as it needed a rebuild for netcdf 4.1-1. I did not adopt it though. > > >> opendx >> Depends: imagemagick,lesstif,netcdf >> Required by: none >> > broken by the netcdf 4.1-1 update. Doesn't build as it did use klibc > which is now deprecated. Unless someone wants to fix this we should > remove this one from the repos. > > Ronald > > +1 for removing opendx From schivmeister at gmail.com Tue Feb 16 14:12:20 2010 From: schivmeister at gmail.com (Ray Rashif) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 03:12:20 +0800 Subject: [aur-general] Deletion Request In-Reply-To: <201002160917.38942.chrdr@gmx.at> References: <201002152331.25007.chrdr@gmx.at> <291cdeab1002151519md676acdse8894351108d6906@mail.gmail.com> <201002160917.38942.chrdr@gmx.at> Message-ID: <291cdeab1002161112u4f74752atd6d496c84bdce672@mail.gmail.com> On 16/02/2010, Christoph wrote: > In this case please orphan: > otf-adf - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24551 > (for the reasons already described in my first request) > > and remove the packages: > adffonts-otf - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34669 > adffonts-ttf - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34671 > adffonts-type1 - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34672 > > I will then adopt otf-adf and then upload new pkgbuilds for > otf-adf > ttf-adf > type1-adf > all then belonging to the group adf-fonts Aight done :) -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD From xenoterracide at gmail.com Tue Feb 16 15:12:04 2010 From: xenoterracide at gmail.com (Caleb Cushing) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:12:04 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] orphan aCiD2 package list Message-ID: <81bfc67a1002161212v63ee9b8axce83063d5496553f@mail.gmail.com> just a short list of what I see out of date right now. perl-class-c3 perl-sql-abstract perl-data-visitor perl-catalyst-plugin-authentication perl-module-install perl-moosex-traits -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com From pressh at gmail.com Tue Feb 16 16:01:10 2010 From: pressh at gmail.com (Ronald van Haren) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:01:10 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list In-Reply-To: <4B7ACFCC.9050000@archlinux.us> References: <4B6BD0E5.7000705@archlinux.us> <4B6C75F0.1010402@t-online.de> <4B6F8CBC.1020707@archlinux.us> <9fcf70361002160800t5df14d2cy1b4f748adcee370@mail.gmail.com> <4B7ACFCC.9050000@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <9fcf70361002161301y6bef7311j5cda4a4ce4d1f830@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) wrote: > On 02/16/2010 10:00 AM, Ronald van Haren wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) >> ?wrote: >> >>> >>> ? ?gdal (out of date) >>> >> >> updated as it needed a rebuild for netcdf 4.1-1. I did not adopt it >> though. >> >> >>> >>> ? ?opendx >>> ? ? ? ?Depends: imagemagick,lesstif,netcdf >>> ? ? ? ?Required by: none >>> >> >> broken by the netcdf 4.1-1 update. Doesn't build as it did use klibc >> which is now deprecated. Unless someone wants to fix this we should >> remove this one from the repos. >> >> Ronald >> >> > > +1 for removing opendx > moved opendx to unsupported. Ronald From chris.g.27 at gmail.com Tue Feb 16 18:08:44 2010 From: chris.g.27 at gmail.com (Chris Giles) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:08:44 +1100 Subject: [aur-general] dpkg outdated - orphan request In-Reply-To: <717b5781002102340g51704284x2253487c490201d4@mail.gmail.com> References: <717b5781002091603q3e231642u5f90fd8f4618ed46@mail.gmail.com> <4B720485.4050305@t-online.de> <736420111002100333n556dfa7cxa1c74297007bf842@mail.gmail.com> <717b5781002101152y4da13588r403834d28a539807@mail.gmail.com> <4B731F79.6020308@gmail.com> <2c36cc541002102016j1ad4b737mfea450ef7407ebc9@mail.gmail.com> <736420111002102333v19c1a2bcmf38b49327b7e9505@mail.gmail.com> <717b5781002102340g51704284x2253487c490201d4@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <2c36cc541002161508j13ad044lccaa8664b4ba78b3@mail.gmail.com> Sorry, I wasn't watching this tread as closely as I was this one. I'm thankful to Lukas for being able to empathise with my position. Users do have a habit of mistakenly flagging AUR packages as outdated; I thought this was the case here, after Firefox still maintained that v1.4.25 was the latest stable release. I'm going to blame the matter on Firefox, for not invalidating my cache fast enough. If I do several 'soft' refreshes, over a period of weeks, a quality web browser should get the message that I want to see the latest version of the webpage. Since that's obviously too much to ask for, I'll just do 'hard' refreshes from now on. From listas at frikilinux.com.ar Wed Feb 17 00:37:17 2010 From: listas at frikilinux.com.ar (Frikilinux) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:37:17 -0300 Subject: [aur-general] minitube In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201002170237.56622.listas@frikilinux.com.ar> On Mar 09 Feb 2010 23:54:35 Giovanni Scafora escribi?: > Hi TUs, > > only to let you know that I just orphaned community/minitube. > Free to take it or I will be moving it to the AUR. Adopted from AUR -- GPG Key ID: 3AA76426 F2CA 440D CA72 FC9C FC67 3946 557F DBEB 3AA7 6426 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From xenoterracide at gmail.com Wed Feb 17 02:13:18 2010 From: xenoterracide at gmail.com (Caleb Cushing) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:13:18 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] please remove perl-perl6-junction Message-ID: <81bfc67a1002162313s18e83eeam35b34879547a7a4b@mail.gmail.com> due to a change in the package generation it's been deprecated by perl6-junction -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com From x-demon at x-demon.org Wed Feb 17 02:52:36 2010 From: x-demon at x-demon.org (Lex Rivera) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:52:36 +0300 Subject: [aur-general] virtualbox_bin status Message-ID: <20100217075236.GA7118@lex-laptop> Current virtualbox_bin maintainer (Dop182) adopted package, but has not updated package (even with working patch in comment) and has not replied nor to mail nor to comments. What we must do now? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From ghost1227 at archlinux.us Wed Feb 17 02:55:56 2010 From: ghost1227 at archlinux.us (Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:55:56 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] virtualbox_bin status In-Reply-To: <20100217075236.GA7118@lex-laptop> References: <20100217075236.GA7118@lex-laptop> Message-ID: <4B7BA10C.9060307@archlinux.us> On 02/17/2010 01:52 AM, Lex Rivera wrote: > Current virtualbox_bin maintainer (Dop182) adopted package, but has not > updated package (even with working patch in comment) and has not replied > nor to mail nor to comments. What we must do now? > If a reasonable amount of time has passed, you can request that one of us orphan it... assuming you're willing to maintain it. From x-demon at x-demon.org Wed Feb 17 03:00:52 2010 From: x-demon at x-demon.org (Lex Rivera) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:00:52 +0300 Subject: [aur-general] virtualbox_bin status In-Reply-To: <4B7BA10C.9060307@archlinux.us> References: <20100217075236.GA7118@lex-laptop> <4B7BA10C.9060307@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <20100217080051.GA14861@lex-laptop> No. I am too lazy to generate for md5sums for all achitectures =/ But looks like Dop just adopted most-voted package in AUR. On 17/02/10 01:55, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) wrote: > On 02/17/2010 01:52 AM, Lex Rivera wrote: > >Current virtualbox_bin maintainer (Dop182) adopted package, but has not > >updated package (even with working patch in comment) and has not replied > >nor to mail nor to comments. What we must do now? > If a reasonable amount of time has passed, you can request that one > of us orphan it... assuming you're willing to maintain it. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From xenoterracide at gmail.com Wed Feb 17 03:44:20 2010 From: xenoterracide at gmail.com (Caleb Cushing) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 03:44:20 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] removal request perl-net-ssleay Message-ID: <81bfc67a1002170044n35c1555fj2a348d8cf0219f10@mail.gmail.com> sorry accidentally uploaded this package because it's not up to date in extra. please remove (already flagged the extra one as out of date) -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com From ghost1227 at archlinux.us Wed Feb 17 03:46:05 2010 From: ghost1227 at archlinux.us (Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:46:05 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] removal request perl-net-ssleay In-Reply-To: <81bfc67a1002170044n35c1555fj2a348d8cf0219f10@mail.gmail.com> References: <81bfc67a1002170044n35c1555fj2a348d8cf0219f10@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B7BACCD.4020708@archlinux.us> On 02/17/2010 02:44 AM, Caleb Cushing wrote: > sorry accidentally uploaded this package because it's not up to date > in extra. please remove (already flagged the extra one as out of date) > Done From carvalho.inacio at gmail.com Wed Feb 17 06:29:15 2010 From: carvalho.inacio at gmail.com (Leandro Inacio) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:29:15 -0300 Subject: [aur-general] virtualbox_bin status In-Reply-To: <20100217080051.GA14861@lex-laptop> References: <20100217075236.GA7118@lex-laptop> <4B7BA10C.9060307@archlinux.us> <20100217080051.GA14861@lex-laptop> Message-ID: Hi Folks, I'm a friend of Dop182, and here in Brazil we are in holiday since 12 Feb. and ends today (17 Feb.). I believe this is the reason for delay in update. -- Leandro In?cio On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 05:00, Lex Rivera wrote: > No. I am too lazy to generate for md5sums for all achitectures =/ But > looks like Dop just adopted most-voted package in AUR. > On 17/02/10 01:55, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) wrote: > > On 02/17/2010 01:52 AM, Lex Rivera wrote: > > >Current virtualbox_bin maintainer (Dop182) adopted package, but has not > > >updated package (even with working patch in comment) and has not replied > > >nor to mail nor to comments. What we must do now? > > If a reasonable amount of time has passed, you can request that one > > of us orphan it... assuming you're willing to maintain it. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkt7ojMACgkQexZt4luVJZk3BACeKD7zpLvf66pRce2JJ8eGgWZw > n????{?????? > =hAmV > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > From magnus at therning.org Wed Feb 17 06:58:19 2010 From: magnus at therning.org (Magnus Therning) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:58:19 +0000 Subject: [aur-general] Bugs Everywhere? Message-ID: I've found a few distributed bugtrackers on AUR, but I really wanted to check out Bugs Everywhere[1]. I can't find it on AUR though. This could be due to my weak search-fu skills, so I thought I'd asking here before going the manual route. /M [1]: http://bugseverywhere.org/be/show/HomePage -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus?therning?org Jabber: magnus?therning?org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe From herve at oursours.net Wed Feb 17 09:08:23 2010 From: herve at oursours.net (=?UTF-8?B?SGVydsOpIENhdXdlbGllcg==?=) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:08:23 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] removal request and issue with the replacing package Message-ID: <4B7BF857.8010903@oursours.net> Hi, I packaged two simple documentation packages: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34297 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34298 They come from the same source package but at that time, I didn't even know build multiple binaries from a single PKGBUILD was possible. So I've merged them in a new PKGBUILD and I ask for the removal of these two obsolete ones. But then I can't upload the new source package. I get: Invalid name: only lowercase letters are allowed. "lpod-docs-html" was accepted so I'm surprised "lpod-docs" isn't. Here is my PKGBUILD: http://pastebin.ca/1799987 Thanks for your help, -- Herv? Cauwelier From allan at archlinux.org Wed Feb 17 09:15:46 2010 From: allan at archlinux.org (Allan McRae) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:15:46 +1000 Subject: [aur-general] removal request and issue with the replacing package In-Reply-To: <4B7BF857.8010903@oursours.net> References: <4B7BF857.8010903@oursours.net> Message-ID: <4B7BFA12.5080302@archlinux.org> On 18/02/10 00:08, Herv? Cauwelier wrote: > Hi, > > I packaged two simple documentation packages: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34297 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34298 > > They come from the same source package but at that time, I didn't even > know build multiple binaries from a single PKGBUILD was possible. > > So I've merged them in a new PKGBUILD and I ask for the removal of these > two obsolete ones. > > But then I can't upload the new source package. I get: > > Invalid name: only lowercase letters are allowed. > > "lpod-docs-html" was accepted so I'm surprised "lpod-docs" isn't. But that is not the pkgname... pkgname=('lpod-docs-html' 'lpod-docs-pdf') Split packages are not supported by the AUR. From herve at oursours.net Wed Feb 17 10:19:14 2010 From: herve at oursours.net (=?UTF-8?B?SGVydsOpIENhdXdlbGllcg==?=) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:19:14 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] removal request and issue with the replacing package In-Reply-To: <4B7BFA12.5080302@archlinux.org> References: <4B7BF857.8010903@oursours.net> <4B7BFA12.5080302@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <4B7C08F2.6000808@oursours.net> On 02/17/10 15:15, Allan McRae wrote: > On 18/02/10 00:08, Herv? Cauwelier wrote: >> [...] >> But then I can't upload the new source package. I get: >> >> Invalid name: only lowercase letters are allowed. >> >> "lpod-docs-html" was accepted so I'm surprised "lpod-docs" isn't. > > But that is not the pkgname... > > pkgname=('lpod-docs-html' 'lpod-docs-pdf') > > Split packages are not supported by the AUR. Is it planned or do you recommend that I stick with separate PKGBUILDs with the same source tarball? Regards -- Herv? Cauwelier From atsutane at freethoughts.de Wed Feb 17 10:48:25 2010 From: atsutane at freethoughts.de (Thorsten =?ISO-8859-1?B?VPZwcGVy?=) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:48:25 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] mass orphan aCiD2's packages In-Reply-To: <81bfc67a1002150946x2bfa9b57oc79314e0a997adee@mail.gmail.com> References: <81bfc67a1002150946x2bfa9b57oc79314e0a997adee@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100217164825.6d186da4@hell> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224 On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:46:06 -0500 Caleb Cushing wrote: > I don't know if it's possible... but aCiD2 left the arch community a > while ago... is it possible to mass orphan his packages? or transfer > them? I've picked up a good share already. At the time we were just > going do them as they needed to be updated. if it's not possible mass > do it, should I just request them here as needed? Asked for approval from his side and done so after I got his permission. - -- Jabber: atsutane at freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iFYEARELAAYFAkt8D8kACgkQOeTxfyla+/RarQDgo523+Mp+AiNvGOPsznjbf4+I h5XX9xGZVa+j/wDg4Zga7X/99xW427wEWNdsWsaqccVaPu9sPqi1Bg== =s/H1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From baker.chris.3 at gmail.com Wed Feb 17 11:29:47 2010 From: baker.chris.3 at gmail.com (Chris Baker) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:29:47 -0700 Subject: [aur-general] Bugs Everywhere? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9a488bc31002170829t537bf5baw2cc8cc693bf20952@mail.gmail.com> Attached is a PKGBUILD that should work. It fails due to a bug in their version numbering system. Oh the irony! Chris On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: > I've found a few distributed bugtrackers on AUR, but I really wanted > to check out Bugs Everywhere[1]. I can't find it on AUR though. This > could be due to my weak search-fu skills, so I thought I'd asking here > before going the manual route. > > /M > > [1]: http://bugseverywhere.org/be/show/HomePage > > -- > Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) > magnus?therning?org Jabber: magnus?therning?org > http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PKGBUILD Type: application/octet-stream Size: 699 bytes Desc: not available URL: From lists at baums-on-web.de Wed Feb 17 11:47:41 2010 From: lists at baums-on-web.de (Heiko Baums) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:47:41 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] removal request and issue with the replacing package In-Reply-To: <4B7C08F2.6000808@oursours.net> References: <4B7BF857.8010903@oursours.net> <4B7BFA12.5080302@archlinux.org> <4B7C08F2.6000808@oursours.net> Message-ID: <20100217174741.5dcfd8ba@darkstar.galaxy.all> Am Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:19:14 +0100 schrieb Herv? Cauwelier : > Is it planned or do you recommend that I stick with separate > PKGBUILDs with the same source tarball? Maybe you should vote for this feature request: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16394?project=2 Greetings, Heiko From schivmeister at gmail.com Wed Feb 17 14:33:20 2010 From: schivmeister at gmail.com (Ray Rashif) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 03:33:20 +0800 Subject: [aur-general] please remove perl-perl6-junction In-Reply-To: <81bfc67a1002162313s18e83eeam35b34879547a7a4b@mail.gmail.com> References: <81bfc67a1002162313s18e83eeam35b34879547a7a4b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <291cdeab1002171133t6021a7b0tfbf6bea0a00aa788@mail.gmail.com> On 17 February 2010 15:13, Caleb Cushing wrote: > due to a change in the package generation it's been deprecated by perl6-junction > > -- > Caleb Cushing > > http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com Done. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD From magnus at therning.org Wed Feb 17 15:31:56 2010 From: magnus at therning.org (Magnus Therning) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:31:56 +0000 Subject: [aur-general] Bugs Everywhere? In-Reply-To: <9a488bc31002170829t537bf5baw2cc8cc693bf20952@mail.gmail.com> References: <9a488bc31002170829t537bf5baw2cc8cc693bf20952@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B7C523C.9050308@therning.org> On 17/02/10 16:29, Chris Baker wrote: > Attached is a PKGBUILD that should work. It fails due to a bug in their > version numbering system. Oh the irony! Thanks for that. It got me off in the right direction. I've attached a slightly updated version that seems to work fine. /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus?therning?org Jabber: magnus?therning?org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: PKGBUILD URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From zoulnix at borkedduck.com Thu Feb 18 10:11:01 2010 From: zoulnix at borkedduck.com (zoulnix) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:11:01 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Packages Removal Req. Message-ID: <8791ff551002180711q489af19y9ea79d70b1de674b@mail.gmail.com> Hi, i would like to have couple of my lxde (svn) packages deleted, since they switched to git now. gpicview-svn -- http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21759 gtknetcat-svn -- http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21761 lxappearance-svn -- http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21773 lxnm-svn -- http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21772 lxpanel-svn -- http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16443 lxsession-edit-svn -- http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22269 lxsession-lite-svn -- http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16685 lxsession-svn -- http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16444 lxshortcut-svn -- http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22271 lxterminal-svn -- http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17416 Remove this one also... switched to git... openlierox-svn -- http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18330 From zoulnix at borkedduck.com Thu Feb 18 10:37:22 2010 From: zoulnix at borkedduck.com (zoulnix) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:37:22 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Packages Removal Req. Message-ID: <8791ff551002180737t1dc8a5ccx3dfc232c5192a9e3@mail.gmail.com> Forgot. lxtask-svn -- http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16688 From atsutane at freethoughts.de Thu Feb 18 10:48:55 2010 From: atsutane at freethoughts.de (Thorsten =?ISO-8859-1?B?VPZwcGVy?=) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:48:55 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Packages Removal Req. In-Reply-To: <8791ff551002180737t1dc8a5ccx3dfc232c5192a9e3@mail.gmail.com> References: <8791ff551002180737t1dc8a5ccx3dfc232c5192a9e3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100218164855.6deef44e@hell> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224 On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:37:22 +0100 zoulnix wrote: > Forgot. > > lxtask-svn -- http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16688 Complete list done, thank you. - -- Jabber: atsutane at freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iFYEARELAAYFAkt9YWcACgkQOeTxfyla+/RJEADg1gof6RHlGSDJTXwvQUIW+98V ynqqmYpWx8UDEQDeOzc2HLzrPq3ETu6d6QSjOuzQ6CLJC7xBRVeKgQ== =/2dy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From fgr at anche.no Thu Feb 18 12:55:53 2010 From: fgr at anche.no (Francesco Groccia) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:55:53 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] renaming request Message-ID: <20100218185553.56290a7d@ao.tmas.riot> Could anybody rename 'localepurge' to 'localepurge-arch'? thanks -- f.gr. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: not available URL: From biru.ionut at gmail.com Thu Feb 18 13:09:57 2010 From: biru.ionut at gmail.com (Ionut Biru) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:09:57 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] renaming request In-Reply-To: <20100218185553.56290a7d@ao.tmas.riot> References: <20100218185553.56290a7d@ao.tmas.riot> Message-ID: <4B7D8275.8010205@gmail.com> On 02/18/2010 07:55 PM, Francesco Groccia wrote: > Could anybody rename 'localepurge' > to > 'localepurge-arch'? > > thanks > renaming is not possible. upload a new build with the proper pkgname and ask for deleting the old one. -- Ionut From nqn1976list at gmail.com Fri Feb 19 02:50:18 2010 From: nqn1976list at gmail.com (A Rojas) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:50:18 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] orphan request Message-ID: Hi, Please orphan rootactions-servicemenu http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20085 It's been out of date for many months, the maintainer doesn't respond to comments and his email address is bouncing. Thanks From ghost1227 at archlinux.us Fri Feb 19 03:06:43 2010 From: ghost1227 at archlinux.us (Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:06:43 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] orphan request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B7E4693.9080403@archlinux.us> On 02/19/2010 01:50 AM, A Rojas wrote: > Hi, > Please orphan rootactions-servicemenu > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20085 > It's been out of date for many months, the maintainer doesn't respond to > comments and his email address is bouncing. Thanks > > > > done From fgr at anche.no Fri Feb 19 04:58:31 2010 From: fgr at anche.no (Francesco Groccia) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:58:31 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] deletion request Message-ID: <20100219105831.45ff66f5@ao.tmas.riot> Since I've renamed 'localepurge' to 'localepurge-arch', the old 'localepurge' should be deleted. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: not available URL: From foutrelis at gmail.com Fri Feb 19 05:41:49 2010 From: foutrelis at gmail.com (Evangelos Foutras) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:41:49 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] deletion request In-Reply-To: <20100219105831.45ff66f5@ao.tmas.riot> References: <20100219105831.45ff66f5@ao.tmas.riot> Message-ID: <4B7E6AED.5080505@gmail.com> On 19/02/2010 11:58 ??, Francesco Groccia wrote: > Since I've renamed 'localepurge' to 'localepurge-arch', the old > 'localepurge' should be deleted. Thanks. What is the purpose of this renaming? It appears that you've forked localepurge to apply some fixes, in which case localepurge shouldn't be deleted. Personally, I would prefer to have the changes included in the original package in the form of one or more patch files and applied during the build process. From lists at bramschoenmakers.nl Fri Feb 19 10:25:16 2010 From: lists at bramschoenmakers.nl (Bram Schoenmakers) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:25:16 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: serverstatuswidget Message-ID: <1280899c1002190725w75ac633amd6e88b0ff3a75266@mail.gmail.com> Hello, The package serverstatuswidget [1] is a duplicate of plasma-server-status-plasmoid [2]. Please remove [1]. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34789 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24867 Thanks in advance, -- Bram Schoenmakers What is mind? No matter. What is matter? Never mind. (Punch, 1855) From pyther at pyther.net Fri Feb 19 10:36:34 2010 From: pyther at pyther.net (pyther) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:36:34 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request: libwebkit package Message-ID: <4B7EB002.1000408@pyther.net> I would like to request that the following packages be removed: libwebkit-light - outdated and the only thing that appears to be different than the official package is the depend of gstreamer. However, from my understanding gstreamer is needed for html5 video. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22555 libwebkit-anjal - outdated and as wonder stated the patch has likely been committed upstream http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30219 Rename: libwebkit-newest - out of date, hasn't been updated for over a month (currently at 1.1.21) This version is a development build, so I would I suggest if the package is not deleted it be renamed to libwebkit-development http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28958 ~pyther From stefan-husmann at t-online.de Fri Feb 19 12:43:20 2010 From: stefan-husmann at t-online.de (Stefan Husmann) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:43:20 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: serverstatuswidget In-Reply-To: <1280899c1002190725w75ac633amd6e88b0ff3a75266@mail.gmail.com> References: <1280899c1002190725w75ac633amd6e88b0ff3a75266@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B7ECDB8.6030803@t-online.de> Am 19.02.2010 16:25, schrieb Bram Schoenmakers: > Hello, > > The package serverstatuswidget [1] is a duplicate of > plasma-server-status-plasmoid [2]. > Please remove [1]. > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34789 > [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24867 > > Thanks in advance, > Done, thank you. From sh at lutzhaase.com Fri Feb 19 12:47:10 2010 From: sh at lutzhaase.com (Sven-Hendrik Haase) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:47:10 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Please delete "zziplib" I just uploaded Message-ID: <4B7ECE9E.8050107@lutzhaase.com> Hey, please delete my AUR package "zziplib" which should have been "mingw32-zziplib" before it causes chaos. Sorry :) -- Sven-Hendrik From foutrelis at gmail.com Fri Feb 19 13:34:24 2010 From: foutrelis at gmail.com (Evangelos Foutras) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:34:24 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request: libwebkit package In-Reply-To: <4B7EB002.1000408@pyther.net> References: <4B7EB002.1000408@pyther.net> Message-ID: <4B7ED9B0.6020001@gmail.com> On 19/02/2010 05:36 ??, pyther wrote: > I would like to request that the following packages be removed: > > libwebkit-light - outdated and the only thing that appears to be > different than the official package is the depend of gstreamer. However, > from my understanding gstreamer is needed for html5 video. > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22555 > > libwebkit-anjal - outdated and as wonder stated the patch has likely > been committed upstream > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30219 > > Rename: > libwebkit-newest - out of date, hasn't been updated for over a month > (currently at 1.1.21) This version is a development build, so I would I > suggest if the package is not deleted it be renamed to > libwebkit-development > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28958 > > ~pyther I deleted all three packages and I'm CC'ing the maintainers of two of them (libwebkit-anjal was an orphan). Nezmer [1]: If you wish, reupload your package as libwebkit-devel as per pyther's suggestion. Thanks! ---- [1] Nezmer was the maintainer of libwebkit-newest. From foutrelis at gmail.com Fri Feb 19 13:36:15 2010 From: foutrelis at gmail.com (Evangelos Foutras) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:36:15 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Please delete "zziplib" I just uploaded In-Reply-To: <4B7ECE9E.8050107@lutzhaase.com> References: <4B7ECE9E.8050107@lutzhaase.com> Message-ID: <4B7EDA1F.3020200@gmail.com> On 19/02/2010 07:47 ??, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > Hey, > > please delete my AUR package "zziplib" which should have been > "mingw32-zziplib" before it causes chaos. > Sorry :) > > -- Sven-Hendrik Done. Cheers! :) From schivmeister at gmail.com Sat Feb 20 00:26:04 2010 From: schivmeister at gmail.com (Ray Rashif) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:26:04 +0800 Subject: [aur-general] freetype2-lcd_ Message-ID: <291cdeab1002192126n5400a307j317b0f91bc99b0b8@mail.gmail.com> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12283 Why does this still exist? There isn't even a freetype2-lcd. I was almost about to delete it but refrained because it had passed the test of time without even a request to orphan. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD From ghost1227 at archlinux.us Sat Feb 20 01:20:13 2010 From: ghost1227 at archlinux.us (Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:20:13 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] freetype2-lcd_ In-Reply-To: <291cdeab1002192126n5400a307j317b0f91bc99b0b8@mail.gmail.com> References: <291cdeab1002192126n5400a307j317b0f91bc99b0b8@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B7F7F1D.7010901@archlinux.us> On 02/19/2010 11:26 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12283 > > Why does this still exist? There isn't even a freetype2-lcd. I was > almost about to delete it but refrained because it had passed the test > of time without even a request to orphan. > > > -- > GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD > > freetype2-lcd is, iirc, a patched version of freetype2 specifically for lcds that was originally built for ubuntu From schivmeister at gmail.com Sat Feb 20 01:40:31 2010 From: schivmeister at gmail.com (Ray Rashif) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:40:31 +0800 Subject: [aur-general] freetype2-lcd_ In-Reply-To: <4B7F7F1D.7010901@archlinux.us> References: <291cdeab1002192126n5400a307j317b0f91bc99b0b8@mail.gmail.com> <4B7F7F1D.7010901@archlinux.us> Message-ID: <291cdeab1002192240l1af7290vbcd6684f8b5ca192@mail.gmail.com> On 20 February 2010 14:20, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) wrote: > freetype2-lcd is, iirc, a patched version of freetype2 specifically for lcds > that was originally built for ubuntu That's freetype2-lcd, which was deleted quite some time ago. From the comments: "Dear All! Please use this build ONLY IF YOU'RE NOT SATISFIED with default one or the build from eWoud (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freetype2-lcd/freetype2-lcd.tar.gz) which are both superior! Major differencies between this one and eWoud are: 1. Usage of linked "zlib" instead of built-in 2. No validation of GX/AAT and OpenType tables 3. No "memcpy-fix" and "bitmap" patches - IMHO - unnecessary, otherwise they'd be included in official branch already And there's no "quantization" patch in official Archlinux freetype2 build. Please don't vote for my build and use it as a last resort only (or if you wish to try "legacy" filter by modifying the tail of "ftoption.h" file)!" I believe it adds nothing as of early 2009: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=467609#p467609 But I may be wrong, especially if this one has been doing something which freetype2-lcd never did. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD From biru.ionut at gmail.com Sat Feb 20 04:23:03 2010 From: biru.ionut at gmail.com (Ionut Biru) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:23:03 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] freetype2-lcd_ In-Reply-To: <291cdeab1002192126n5400a307j317b0f91bc99b0b8@mail.gmail.com> References: <291cdeab1002192126n5400a307j317b0f91bc99b0b8@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B7FA9F7.7040904@gmail.com> On 02/20/2010 07:26 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12283 > > Why does this still exist? There isn't even a freetype2-lcd. I was > almost about to delete it but refrained because it had passed the test > of time without even a request to orphan. > > > -- > GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD i don't know who deleted it but i know that was such build when we did libpng rebuild -- Ionut From thomas.jost at gmail.com Sat Feb 20 05:08:54 2010 From: thomas.jost at gmail.com (Thomas Jost) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:08:54 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request: zsh-netcfg Message-ID: <4B7FB4B6.1070306@gmail.com> Hello, My zsh completion script for netcfg is now included in core/netcfg, making my zsh-netcfg package useless. Could a TU please delete it? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22300 Thanks in advance. -- Thomas/Schnouki -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From foutrelis at gmail.com Sat Feb 20 05:25:17 2010 From: foutrelis at gmail.com (Evangelos Foutras) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 12:25:17 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request: zsh-netcfg In-Reply-To: <4B7FB4B6.1070306@gmail.com> References: <4B7FB4B6.1070306@gmail.com> Message-ID: On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Thomas Jost wrote: > Hello, > > My zsh completion script for netcfg is now included in core/netcfg, > making my zsh-netcfg package useless. > > Could a TU please delete it? > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22300 > > Thanks in advance. > > -- > Thomas/Schnouki Done. :) From fgr at anche.no Sat Feb 20 09:24:15 2010 From: fgr at anche.no (Francesco Groccia) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:24:15 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] deletion request In-Reply-To: <4B7E6AED.5080505@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100220152415.47257dc9@ao.tmas.riot> > Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On 19/02/2010 11:58 ??, Francesco Groccia wrote: > > Since I've renamed 'localepurge' to 'localepurge-arch', the old > > 'localepurge' should be deleted. Thanks. [...] > Personally, I would prefer to have the changes included in the > original package in the form of one or more patch files and applied > during the build process. that's OK, done. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11975 (you can see my comment). Now, 'localepurge-arch' package is redundant. Please delete it. From stefanwilkens at gmail.com Sat Feb 20 09:35:55 2010 From: stefanwilkens at gmail.com (Stefan Erik Wilkens) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:35:55 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Orphan request: msn-pecan and bareftp Message-ID: <47fac79b1002200635m5dfb2720wee646a5eb685911c@mail.gmail.com> Hello, I request the following packages to be orphaned so that I may maintain then, both have not been updated since June / July 2009 regardless of flagging or attempts to contact the listed maintainer. msn-pecan: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15327 bareftp: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22360 Thanks, Stefan From foutrelis at gmail.com Sat Feb 20 09:37:16 2010 From: foutrelis at gmail.com (Evangelos Foutras) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:37:16 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] deletion request In-Reply-To: <20100220152415.47257dc9@ao.tmas.riot> References: <20100220152415.47257dc9@ao.tmas.riot> Message-ID: <4B7FF39C.1040303@gmail.com> On 20/02/2010 04:24 ??, Francesco Groccia wrote: >> Evangelos Foutras wrote: > >> On 19/02/2010 11:58 ??, Francesco Groccia wrote: >>> Since I've renamed 'localepurge' to 'localepurge-arch', the old >>> 'localepurge' should be deleted. Thanks. > [...] >> Personally, I would prefer to have the changes included in the >> original package in the form of one or more patch files and applied >> during the build process. > > that's OK, done. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11975 > (you can see my comment). > > Now, 'localepurge-arch' package is redundant. Please delete it. Great. localepurge-arch is no more. :) From foutrelis at gmail.com Sat Feb 20 09:39:57 2010 From: foutrelis at gmail.com (Evangelos Foutras) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:39:57 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Orphan request: msn-pecan and bareftp In-Reply-To: <47fac79b1002200635m5dfb2720wee646a5eb685911c@mail.gmail.com> References: <47fac79b1002200635m5dfb2720wee646a5eb685911c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B7FF43D.50801@gmail.com> On 20/02/2010 04:35 ??, Stefan Erik Wilkens wrote: > Hello, > > I request the following packages to be orphaned so that I may maintain > then, both have not been updated since June / July 2009 regardless of > flagging or attempts to contact the listed maintainer. > > msn-pecan: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15327 > > bareftp: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22360 > > Thanks, > > Stefan Both packages have been disowned. Go ahead and adopt them! Cheers. From stefanwilkens at gmail.com Sat Feb 20 09:54:53 2010 From: stefanwilkens at gmail.com (Stefan Erik Wilkens) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:54:53 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Orphan request: msn-pecan and bareftp In-Reply-To: <4B7FF43D.50801@gmail.com> References: <47fac79b1002200635m5dfb2720wee646a5eb685911c@mail.gmail.com> <4B7FF43D.50801@gmail.com> Message-ID: <47fac79b1002200654l107cd248we9228ea03497b853@mail.gmail.com> 2010/2/20 Evangelos Foutras : > On 20/02/2010 04:35 ??, Stefan Erik Wilkens wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I request the following packages to be orphaned so that I may maintain >> then, both have not been updated since June / July 2009 regardless of >> flagging or attempts to contact the listed maintainer. >> >> msn-pecan: >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15327 >> >> bareftp: >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22360 >> >> Thanks, >> >> Stefan > > Both packages have been disowned. Go ahead and adopt them! > > Cheers. > adopted & updated thank you. -- msn: stefan_wilkens at hotmail.com e-mail: stefanwilkens at gmail.com blog: http://www.stefanwilkens.eu/ adres: Lipperkerkstraat 14 7511 DA Enschede From x-demon at x-demon.org Sat Feb 20 15:35:56 2010 From: x-demon at x-demon.org (Lex Rivera) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:35:56 +0300 Subject: [aur-general] orphan req Message-ID: <20100220203556.GA8520@lex-laptop> Please orphan curlpp, author hasn't update it and hasn't responded to mail. I have updated package. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From xenoterracide at gmail.com Sat Feb 20 15:48:42 2010 From: xenoterracide at gmail.com (Caleb Cushing) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:48:42 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] orphan perl-text-balanced plz Message-ID: <81bfc67a1002201248g3900fa7ah6cdbb32fb8cf30aa@mail.gmail.com> I emailed the author a few days ago (flagged it out of date weeks ago) no response. perl-data-dpath now depends on 2.02. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com From biru.ionut at gmail.com Sat Feb 20 15:55:22 2010 From: biru.ionut at gmail.com (Ionut Biru) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 22:55:22 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] orphan perl-text-balanced plz In-Reply-To: <81bfc67a1002201248g3900fa7ah6cdbb32fb8cf30aa@mail.gmail.com> References: <81bfc67a1002201248g3900fa7ah6cdbb32fb8cf30aa@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B804C3A.7050807@gmail.com> On 02/20/2010 10:48 PM, Caleb Cushing wrote: > I emailed the author a few days ago (flagged it out of date weeks ago) > no response. perl-data-dpath now depends on 2.02. done -- Ionut From biru.ionut at gmail.com Sat Feb 20 15:55:50 2010 From: biru.ionut at gmail.com (Ionut Biru) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 22:55:50 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] orphan req In-Reply-To: <20100220203556.GA8520@lex-laptop> References: <20100220203556.GA8520@lex-laptop> Message-ID: <4B804C56.2070100@gmail.com> On 02/20/2010 10:35 PM, Lex Rivera wrote: > Please orphan curlpp, author hasn't update it and hasn't responded to > mail. I have updated package. done -- Ionut From sh at lutzhaase.com Sat Feb 20 17:44:38 2010 From: sh at lutzhaase.com (Sven-Hendrik Haase) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:44:38 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Please orphan package "raknet" Message-ID: <4B8065D6.8020206@lutzhaase.com> Hey, please orphan AUR package "raknet" (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15279) for me as it hasn't been updated for almost 2 years and the maintainer seems inactive. I shall shelter and protect it henceforth. -- Sven-Hendrik From atsutane at freethoughts.de Sat Feb 20 17:56:52 2010 From: atsutane at freethoughts.de (Thorsten =?ISO-8859-1?B?VPZwcGVy?=) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:56:52 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Please orphan package "raknet" In-Reply-To: <4B8065D6.8020206@lutzhaase.com> References: <4B8065D6.8020206@lutzhaase.com> Message-ID: <20100220235652.499585a2@hell> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224 On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:44:38 +0100 Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > Hey, > > please orphan AUR package "raknet" > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15279) for me as it hasn't > been updated for almost 2 years and the maintainer seems inactive. I > shall shelter and protect it henceforth. > > -- Sven-Hendrik Done. - -- Jabber: atsutane at freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iFYEARELAAYFAkuAaLQACgkQOeTxfyla+/T9egDgznDfU2QXdBI3oS4SHRD5+hgD 78QzjW6hXPHoiQDgkiREalgZCR7tR23C8oHYwvzSzg3FsNH+A8oQlA== =HAV6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From come.pruvost at gmail.com Sun Feb 21 05:57:52 2010 From: come.pruvost at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?C=C3=B4me_Pruvost?=) Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:57:52 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request Message-ID: Hi list ! I updated vcs versions of lxinput and lxmusic. As LXDE moved from subversion to git, I created lxinput-git and lxmusic-git. Now lxinput-svn[1] and lxmusic-svn[2] are of no use. Could you please delete them ? Thanks, Cilyan [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26350 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26397 From foutrelis at gmail.com Sun Feb 21 06:06:21 2010 From: foutrelis at gmail.com (Evangelos Foutras) Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:06:21 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B8113AD.40103@gmail.com> On 21/02/2010 12:57 ??, C?me Pruvost wrote: > Hi list ! > I updated vcs versions of lxinput and lxmusic. As LXDE moved from > subversion to git, I created lxinput-git and lxmusic-git. > Now lxinput-svn[1] and lxmusic-svn[2] are of no use. Could you please > delete them ? > Thanks, > Cilyan > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26350 > [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26397 Deleted. From fbabetz at yahoo.it Sun Feb 21 09:30:28 2010 From: fbabetz at yahoo.it (F B) Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:30:28 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [aur-general] Orphan request Message-ID: <691372.29183.qm@web27903.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Hi, I saw that the et-sdl-sound maintainer (http://aur.archlinux.org/account.php?Action=AccountInfo&ID=9985) doesn't update that package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9777) and doesn't respond to aur comments, other packages like enemy-territory need to be corrected (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2063). I sent him an email the 3rd of this month without receiving a reponse. So I'm thinking he is inactive, many of his packages are outdated so, maybe, a good idea is to orphan all his packages, right? Thank you in advance. From xenoterracide at gmail.com Mon Feb 22 04:02:03 2010 From: xenoterracide at gmail.com (Caleb Cushing) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 04:02:03 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] plz remove perl-file-chdir Message-ID: <81bfc67a1002220102rb55e34h1a88b6e13bfaa8a9@mail.gmail.com> accidental addition in mass upload -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com From giovanni at archlinux.org Mon Feb 22 04:09:17 2010 From: giovanni at archlinux.org (Giovanni Scafora) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:09:17 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] plz remove perl-file-chdir In-Reply-To: <81bfc67a1002220102rb55e34h1a88b6e13bfaa8a9@mail.gmail.com> References: <81bfc67a1002220102rb55e34h1a88b6e13bfaa8a9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: 2010/2/22, Caleb Cushing : > accidental addition in mass upload Done. -- Arch Linux Developer http://www.archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.it From brieuc.roblin at gmail.com Mon Feb 22 07:44:09 2010 From: brieuc.roblin at gmail.com (Brieuc ROBLIN) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:44:09 +0000 Subject: [aur-general] Please remove libqextserialport-cvs Message-ID: <4B827C19.9080502@gmail.com> I just create the package and it's already out-of-date because the cvs is no longer used. From foutrelis at gmail.com Mon Feb 22 08:23:50 2010 From: foutrelis at gmail.com (Evangelos Foutras) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:23:50 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Please remove libqextserialport-cvs In-Reply-To: <4B827C19.9080502@gmail.com> References: <4B827C19.9080502@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B828566.20106@gmail.com> On 22/02/2010 02:44 ??, Brieuc ROBLIN wrote: > I just create the package and it's already out-of-date because the cvs > is no longer used. Done. From stefan-husmann at t-online.de Tue Feb 23 14:05:22 2010 From: stefan-husmann at t-online.de (Stefan Husmann) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:05:22 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Orphan request In-Reply-To: <691372.29183.qm@web27903.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <691372.29183.qm@web27903.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <4B8426F2.3070206@t-online.de> Am 21.02.2010 15:30, schrieb F B: > Hi, > I saw that the et-sdl-sound maintainer (http://aur.archlinux.org/account.php?Action=AccountInfo&ID=9985) doesn't update that package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9777) and doesn't respond to aur comments, other packages like enemy-territory need to be corrected (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2063). > I sent him an email the 3rd of this month without receiving a reponse. > So I'm thinking he is inactive, many of his packages are outdated so, maybe, a good idea is to orphan all his packages, right? > > Thank you in advance. > > Hello, he has 76 packages in AUR, and just uploaded a new release of flush. So he is definitely not inactive. I will write a mail to him. Regards Stefan From liuju86 at gmail.com Tue Feb 23 19:44:48 2010 From: liuju86 at gmail.com (Ju Liu) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:44:48 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Orphan request In-Reply-To: <4B8426F2.3070206@t-online.de> References: <691372.29183.qm@web27903.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4B8426F2.3070206@t-online.de> Message-ID: On 23/feb/2010, at 20.05, Stefan Husmann wrote: > Am 21.02.2010 15:30, schrieb F B: >> Hi, >> I saw that the et-sdl-sound maintainer (http://aur.archlinux.org/account.php?Action=AccountInfo&ID=9985) doesn't update that package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9777) and doesn't respond to aur comments, other packages like enemy-territory need to be corrected (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2063). >> I sent him an email the 3rd of this month without receiving a reponse. >> So I'm thinking he is inactive, many of his packages are outdated so, maybe, a good idea is to orphan all his packages, right? >> >> Thank you in advance. >> >> > Hello, > > he has 76 packages in AUR, and just uploaded a new release of flush. So he is definitely not inactive. I will write a mail to him. > > Regards Stefan Hey everybody, I am really sorry that I have been unable to maintain decently my packages in the last months, but due to the beginning of a PhD program I have been extremely busy IRL. As an unbelievable coincidence, even if I didn't read these emails I updated some of my packages today, and I am planning to update the ones I am interested in the next days; moreover, I will orphan the ones I don't want to maintain anymore, so that whoever is interested can adopt them ;-) Kind regards, Ju From stefanwilkens at gmail.com Tue Feb 23 20:54:05 2010 From: stefanwilkens at gmail.com (Stefan Erik Wilkens) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:54:05 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU help needed on a few cases Message-ID: <47fac79b1002231754m21b1ba98h37a6b38ea1358958@mail.gmail.com> I've located some entries that need some TU love: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31378 Request to be deleted was posted a while ago, it's a duplicate to http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20690. That is still maintained. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22983 brute force tools? do we want that at all? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25450 project was renamed and re-uploaded under that new name, this should be removed. finally, could somebody with a 64 bit machine help me out here (notice the latest comment): http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25145 Thanks, Stefan -- msn: stefan_wilkens at hotmail.com e-mail: stefanwilkens at gmail.com blog: http://www.stefanwilkens.eu/ adres: Lipperkerkstraat 14 7511 DA Enschede From gilles.quenot at gmail.com Tue Feb 23 21:12:34 2010 From: gilles.quenot at gmail.com (Gilles-Alexandre) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:12:34 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] [TU] google-translator is deprecated by a new package : multitranslator, please remove google-translator Message-ID: <4B848B12.8090207@gmail.com> Hi there. please remove http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33067 in benefits of that one : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34994 All are my packages. Thanks in advance ;) ++,$putick. From giovanni at archlinux.org Tue Feb 23 21:14:09 2010 From: giovanni at archlinux.org (Giovanni Scafora) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:14:09 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] [TU] google-translator is deprecated by a new package : multitranslator, please remove google-translator In-Reply-To: <4B848B12.8090207@gmail.com> References: <4B848B12.8090207@gmail.com> Message-ID: 2010/2/24, Gilles-Alexandre : > Hi there. > > please remove > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33067 > in benefits of that one : > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34994 > All are my packages. Done. -- Arch Linux Developer http://www.archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.it From gilles.quenot at gmail.com Tue Feb 23 21:15:18 2010 From: gilles.quenot at gmail.com (Gilles-Alexandre) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:15:18 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] [TU] google-translator is deprecated by a new package : multitranslator, please remove google-translator In-Reply-To: References: <4B848B12.8090207@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B848BB6.8000203@gmail.com> On 24/02/2010 03:14, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > 2010/2/24, Gilles-Alexandre: > >> Hi there. >> >> please remove >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33067 >> in benefits of that one : >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34994 >> All are my packages. >> > Done. > > > Wow ! Very quick ! Thanks ^^ From ghost1227 at archlinux.us Tue Feb 23 23:06:25 2010 From: ghost1227 at archlinux.us (Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:06:25 -0600 Subject: [aur-general] TU help needed on a few cases In-Reply-To: <47fac79b1002231754m21b1ba98h37a6b38ea1358958@mail.gmail.com> References: <47fac79b1002231754m21b1ba98h37a6b38ea1358958@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <8a2b1b591002232006q53b37593wab539d4872247013@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Stefan Erik Wilkens wrote: > I've located some entries that need some TU love: > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31378 > Request to be deleted was posted a while ago, it's a duplicate to > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20690. That is still > maintained. > Done > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22983 > brute force tools? do we want that at all? > Sure, we have jtr, i see nothing wrong with this. It's up to the user to only use it for legal purposes. > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25450 > project was renamed and re-uploaded under that new name, this should be removed. > Done > finally, could somebody with a 64 bit machine help me out here (notice > the latest comment): > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25145 > Done > Thanks, > > Stefan > > -- > msn: stefan_wilkens at hotmail.com > e-mail: stefanwilkens at gmail.com > blog: http://www.stefanwilkens.eu/ > adres: Lipperkerkstraat 14 7511 DA Enschede > From sh at lutzhaase.com Wed Feb 24 11:31:39 2010 From: sh at lutzhaase.com (Sven-Hendrik Haase) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:31:39 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Please remove AUR package "syntensity-bzr" Message-ID: <4B85546B.2000607@lutzhaase.com> Hey, please remove "syntensity-bzr" (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33464) as it is completely outdated (repo changed, dvcs changed, build system changed) and is succeeded by "intensityengine-git" (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33464). The name of "intensityengine" is also more fitting since "syntensity" is the project rather than the technical basis. -- Sven-Hendrik From atsutane at freethoughts.de Wed Feb 24 12:05:09 2010 From: atsutane at freethoughts.de (Thorsten =?ISO-8859-1?B?VPZwcGVy?=) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:05:09 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Please remove AUR package "syntensity-bzr" In-Reply-To: <4B85546B.2000607@lutzhaase.com> References: <4B85546B.2000607@lutzhaase.com> Message-ID: <20100224180509.40d722f6@hell> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:31:39 +0100 Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > Hey, > > please remove "syntensity-bzr" > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33464) as it is completely > outdated (repo changed, dvcs changed, build system changed) and is > succeeded by "intensityengine-git" > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33464). > The name of "intensityengine" is also more fitting since "syntensity" > is the project rather than the technical basis. > > -- Sven-Hendrik Done, thanks for adding the links, however take care that they're not the false ones, this can lead to misunderstandings ;) -- Jabber: atsutane at freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 222 bytes Desc: not available URL: From sh at lutzhaase.com Wed Feb 24 12:08:25 2010 From: sh at lutzhaase.com (Sven-Hendrik Haase) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:08:25 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Please remove AUR package "syntensity-bzr" In-Reply-To: <20100224180509.40d722f6@hell> References: <4B85546B.2000607@lutzhaase.com> <20100224180509.40d722f6@hell> Message-ID: <4B855D09.5060400@lutzhaase.com> On 24.02.2010 18:05, Thorsten T?pper wrote: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:31:39 +0100 > Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> please remove "syntensity-bzr" >> (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33464) as it is completely >> outdated (repo changed, dvcs changed, build system changed) and is >> succeeded by "intensityengine-git" >> (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33464). >> The name of "intensityengine" is also more fitting since "syntensity" >> is the project rather than the technical basis. >> >> -- Sven-Hendrik >> > Done, thanks for adding the links, however take care that they're not > the false ones, this can lead to misunderstandings ;) > > Whoops sorry. Normally I double check them :(. From erol at grahm.nu Thu Feb 25 10:12:36 2010 From: erol at grahm.nu (Erol Grahm) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:12:36 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Wan't to adpost lsb-release in AUR Message-ID: <91081C3885DB41A489FA6BACAC0C735A@Jenxies> Hi, Could i possibly maintain "lsb-release" in the AUR, I need a working version for my current package project "ncbi-tools" for it to compile correctly. The current maintainer is unresponsive and 3 people at the moment needs it. Thank you - Corex From foutrelis at gmail.com Thu Feb 25 10:16:23 2010 From: foutrelis at gmail.com (Evangelos Foutras) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:16:23 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Wan't to adpost lsb-release in AUR In-Reply-To: <91081C3885DB41A489FA6BACAC0C735A@Jenxies> References: <91081C3885DB41A489FA6BACAC0C735A@Jenxies> Message-ID: <4B869447.9040908@gmail.com> On 25/02/2010 05:12 ??, Erol Grahm wrote: > Hi, > > Could i possibly maintain "lsb-release" in the AUR, I need a working version > for my current package project "ncbi-tools" for it to compile correctly. The > current maintainer is unresponsive and 3 people at the moment needs it. > > Thank you - Corex What exactly is broken in the current package? Also, have you tried patching ncbi-tools to build correctly with the present lsb-release package? Both questions are sincere as I don't have experience with either software. From erol at grahm.nu Thu Feb 25 10:27:18 2010 From: erol at grahm.nu (Erol Grahm) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:27:18 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Wan't to adpost lsb-release in AUR In-Reply-To: <4B869447.9040908@gmail.com> References: <91081C3885DB41A489FA6BACAC0C735A@Jenxies> <4B869447.9040908@gmail.com> Message-ID: My mistake, the package wans't broken, it was actually that the binary's itself that don't wan't to call DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Arch Linux" in /etc/lsb-release. Ncbi-tools just calls the lsb_release tool to get information about the system so I'll have to try another approach. Sorry to bother ya -----Original Message----- From: aur-general-bounces at archlinux.org [mailto:aur-general-bounces at archlinux.org] On Behalf Of Evangelos Foutras Sent: den 25 februari 2010 16:16 To: Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR) Subject: Re: [aur-general] Wan't to adpost lsb-release in AUR On 25/02/2010 05:12 ??, Erol Grahm wrote: > Hi, > > Could i possibly maintain "lsb-release" in the AUR, I need a working version > for my current package project "ncbi-tools" for it to compile correctly. The > current maintainer is unresponsive and 3 people at the moment needs it. > > Thank you - Corex What exactly is broken in the current package? Also, have you tried patching ncbi-tools to build correctly with the present lsb-release package? Both questions are sincere as I don't have experience with either software. From sheepeh at gmx.co.uk Thu Feb 25 12:39:30 2010 From: sheepeh at gmx.co.uk (Sheepeh) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:39:30 -0000 Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request (bin32-crossover-games) Message-ID: I think this is the correct way to request a removal, but please tell me if it isn't! =) If you could please remove my package at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34985 (bin32-crossover-games) as it's now redundant; a fellow user informed me how to make a package install different deps depending on arch. The "crossover-games" package now handles both i686 and x86_64 equally well, so I'll just keep that one maintained. Apologies for making it redundant quite so quickly! -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From foutrelis at gmail.com Thu Feb 25 14:00:02 2010 From: foutrelis at gmail.com (Evangelos Foutras) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:00:02 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request (bin32-crossover-games) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Sheepeh wrote: > I think this is the correct way to request a removal, but please tell me if > it isn't! =) > > If you could please remove my package at > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34985 (bin32-crossover-games) as > it's now redundant; a fellow user informed me how to make a package install > different deps depending on arch. ?The "crossover-games" package now handles > both i686 and x86_64 equally well, so I'll just keep that one maintained. > ?Apologies for making it redundant quite so quickly! Done. Also, in crossover-games you need to add a space before the equals sign in the architecture check, otherwise it will always fail and select dependencies for x86_64. The exact error is shown below (this was run on a i686 machine): [foutrelis at failboat ~]$ if [ $CARCH= 'i686' ]; then echo i686; else echo x86_64; fi -bash: [: i686=: unary operator expected x86_64 And below is the same check with the missing space character added: [foutrelis at failboat ~]$ if [ $CARCH = 'i686' ]; then echo i686; else echo x86_64; fi i686 Cheers. From sheepeh at gmx.co.uk Thu Feb 25 16:43:41 2010 From: sheepeh at gmx.co.uk (Sheepeh) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:43:41 -0000 Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request (bin32-crossover-games) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:00:02 -0000, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Sheepeh wrote: >> I think this is the correct way to request a removal, but please tell >> me if >> it isn't! =) >> >> If you could please remove my package at >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34985 (bin32-crossover-games) >> as >> it's now redundant; a fellow user informed me how to make a package >> install >> different deps depending on arch. The "crossover-games" package now >> handles >> both i686 and x86_64 equally well, so I'll just keep that one >> maintained. >> Apologies for making it redundant quite so quickly! > > Done. Also, in crossover-games you need to add a space before the > equals sign in the architecture check, otherwise it will always fail > and select dependencies for x86_64. The exact error is shown below > (this was run on a i686 machine): > > [foutrelis at failboat ~]$ if [ $CARCH= 'i686' ]; then echo i686; else > echo x86_64; fi > -bash: [: i686=: unary operator expected > x86_64 > > And below is the same check with the missing space character added: > > [foutrelis at failboat ~]$ if [ $CARCH = 'i686' ]; then echo i686; else > echo x86_64; fi > i686 > > Cheers. Thanks very much for that change, I've made the required edits and all should now be well. -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From ekse.0x at gmail.com Thu Feb 25 19:22:17 2010 From: ekse.0x at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Duquette?=) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:22:17 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Please orphan dnsmap Message-ID: <66523eef1002251622j37a7071ene15319e4b1be0012@mail.gmail.com> Hi, Please orphan dnsmap, it has not been updated for I while and I plan to maintain it. I contacted the current owner (anoxia) and he says he doesn't have access to his account anymore. Thank you, S?bastien Response from anoxia : Hey, please feel free to update the PKGBUILD and make yourself the maintainer, I no longer have access to my AUR account and also have not been using Arch for the last 4 months, so it would be fine for you to adopt this package =) Thanks & Regards, Jinx From foutrelis at gmail.com Thu Feb 25 19:38:29 2010 From: foutrelis at gmail.com (Evangelos Foutras) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:38:29 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Please orphan dnsmap In-Reply-To: <66523eef1002251622j37a7071ene15319e4b1be0012@mail.gmail.com> References: <66523eef1002251622j37a7071ene15319e4b1be0012@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: 2010/2/26 S?bastien Duquette : > Hi, > > Please orphan dnsmap, it has not been updated for I while and I plan > to maintain it. I contacted the current owner (anoxia) and he says he > doesn't have access to his account anymore. > > Thank you, > > S?bastien > > Response from anoxia : > Hey, please feel free to update the PKGBUILD and make yourself the maintainer, > I no longer have access to my AUR account and also have not been using Arch > for the last 4 months, so it would be fine for you to adopt this package =) > > Thanks & Regards, > Jinx Done. From ekse.0x at gmail.com Thu Feb 25 19:40:17 2010 From: ekse.0x at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Duquette?=) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:40:17 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Please orphan dnsmap In-Reply-To: References: <66523eef1002251622j37a7071ene15319e4b1be0012@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <66523eef1002251640m27aebf9dx53bf7ad3f6179a2e@mail.gmail.com> Thanks. On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > 2010/2/26 S?bastien Duquette : >> Hi, >> >> Please orphan dnsmap, it has not been updated for I while and I plan >> to maintain it. I contacted the current owner (anoxia) and he says he >> doesn't have access to his account anymore. >> >> Thank you, >> >> S?bastien >> >> Response from anoxia : >> Hey, please feel free to update the PKGBUILD and make yourself the maintainer, >> I no longer have access to my AUR account and also have not been using Arch >> for the last 4 months, so it would be fine for you to adopt this package =) >> >> Thanks & Regards, >> Jinx > > Done. > From pierre at archlinux.de Fri Feb 26 07:24:13 2010 From: pierre at archlinux.de (Pierre Schmitz) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:24:13 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Namcap/XZ compatibility (was: Accept any *.pkg.tar.* package file name) In-Reply-To: <449c10961002212155u127732b9i5d6db6c0f6d0f8bc@mail.gmail.com> References: <449c10961002212155u127732b9i5d6db6c0f6d0f8bc@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <201002261324.13731.pierre@archlinux.de> Am Montag, 22. Februar 2010 06:55:03 schrieb Dan McGee: > > It might sound silly but the probably easiest solution might be to modify > > namcap to support uncompressed tar archives. Then we can add a simple > > Bash wrapper script which uncompresses the package and calls namcap with > > the pure tar. > > Looking at the code, there is nothing preventing this right now- we > just use a generic tar interface which will support any compression or > no compression at all. For those who want to check their xz packages before the next namcap released I have added the relevant patches to namcap 2.4: https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre/packages/namcap-2.4-1.1-i686.pkg.tar.xz https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre/packages/namcap-2.4-1.1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz And the PKGBUILD including the patches can be found at https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre/packages/namcap-2.4-1.1.src.tar.gz Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre From chantry.xavier at gmail.com Fri Feb 26 10:03:44 2010 From: chantry.xavier at gmail.com (Xavier Chantry) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:03:44 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] vim-git : removal request Message-ID: To quote my comment on http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31000 : vim now has an official hg repository, which obsoletes the unofficial git one. This means the git repo will be stopped at some point. And that I will delete this package in one week or so. I hope the 2 users can move to vim-hg :) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33422 Too bad, it was a cool AUR ID ! From foutrelis at gmail.com Fri Feb 26 10:50:57 2010 From: foutrelis at gmail.com (Evangelos Foutras) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:50:57 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] vim-git : removal request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B87EDE1.9090309@gmail.com> On 26/02/2010 05:03 ??, Xavier Chantry wrote: > To quote my comment on http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31000 : > > vim now has an official hg repository, which obsoletes the unofficial git one. > This means the git repo will be stopped at some point. And that I will > delete this package in one week or so. > I hope the 2 users can move to vim-hg :) > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33422 > > Too bad, it was a cool AUR ID ! Done. From ekse.0x at gmail.com Fri Feb 26 14:56:38 2010 From: ekse.0x at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Duquette?=) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:56:38 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Please remove hardware4linux.info-collector Message-ID: <66523eef1002261156j201a74ebhf0a10aedb6098b27@mail.gmail.com> Hi, Please remove the hardware4linux.info-collector package, it is a duplicate of the hwreport which I have adopted. Regards, S?bastien From foutrelis at gmail.com Fri Feb 26 15:14:56 2010 From: foutrelis at gmail.com (Evangelos Foutras) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:14:56 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Please remove hardware4linux.info-collector In-Reply-To: <66523eef1002261156j201a74ebhf0a10aedb6098b27@mail.gmail.com> References: <66523eef1002261156j201a74ebhf0a10aedb6098b27@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B882BC0.9070408@gmail.com> On 26/02/2010 09:56 ??, S?bastien Duquette wrote: > Hi, > > Please remove the hardware4linux.info-collector package, it is a > duplicate of the hwreport which I have adopted. > > Regards, > > S?bastien Done. From ekse.0x at gmail.com Fri Feb 26 17:04:59 2010 From: ekse.0x at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Duquette?=) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:04:59 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Please remove hardware4linux.info-collector In-Reply-To: <4B882BC0.9070408@gmail.com> References: <66523eef1002261156j201a74ebhf0a10aedb6098b27@mail.gmail.com> <4B882BC0.9070408@gmail.com> Message-ID: <66523eef1002261404y310ab26bx89a983a98f740e7d@mail.gmail.com> Thanks. On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On 26/02/2010 09:56 ??, S?bastien Duquette wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Please remove the hardware4linux.info-collector package, it is a >> duplicate of the hwreport which I have adopted. >> >> Regards, >> >> S?bastien > > Done. > From andrea at archlinux.org Fri Feb 26 19:04:08 2010 From: andrea at archlinux.org (Andrea Scarpino) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 01:04:08 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Away Message-ID: <201002270104.09919.andrea@archlinux.org> Hi DEVs and TUs, my exams session is over, and I need a short holiday in London. I will be away starting from some hours to 2nd afternoon/night (GMT). I am building KDE 4.4.1 packages and everything seems fine. Before to go, I will upload them into my staging/extra dir, so you can take them. This minor release will be released 2nd March; I should come back in time to run /arch/db-extra, anyway Ronald and Pierre are here for everything. Free to fix high or medium priority bugs assigned to me or to update my packages. Thanks. Best Regards -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer From catwell at archlinux.us Sat Feb 27 08:12:39 2010 From: catwell at archlinux.us (Pierre Chapuis) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:12:39 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] [orphan request] mlmmj Message-ID: Hello, I would like mlmmj to be orphaned so that I can adopt it. It has been flagged out of date for a long time, I have posted a working PKGBUILD in the comments 10 days ago and I have emailed its maintainer without an answer. Package link: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12175 From giovanni at archlinux.org Sat Feb 27 08:16:51 2010 From: giovanni at archlinux.org (Giovanni Scafora) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:16:51 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] [orphan request] mlmmj In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: 2010/2/27, Pierre Chapuis : > Package link: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12175 It's orphan. -- Arch Linux Developer http://www.archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.it From catwell at archlinux.us Sat Feb 27 08:24:44 2010 From: catwell at archlinux.us (Pierre Chapuis) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:24:44 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] [orphan request] mlmmj In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <91909e789a1080d7c08da6e9d37e0ca0@catwell.info> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:16:51 +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > 2010/2/27, Pierre Chapuis : >> Package link: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12175 > > It's orphan. Adopted, thanks! From roman.kyrylych at gmail.com Sat Feb 27 11:14:41 2010 From: roman.kyrylych at gmail.com (Roman Kyrylych) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:14:41 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Away In-Reply-To: <201002270104.09919.andrea@archlinux.org> References: <201002270104.09919.andrea@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <577f15291002270814q7c412104u816be05d3ed83c7d@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 02:04, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > Hi DEVs and TUs, > my exams session is over, and I need a short holiday in London. Have a nice time there! -- Roman Kyrylych (????? ???????) From xenoterracide at gmail.com Sat Feb 27 23:37:52 2010 From: xenoterracide at gmail.com (Caleb Cushing) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:37:52 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] orphan perl-hash-merge plz Message-ID: <81bfc67a1002272037o37b1a6cfr4abe274f28e04c60@mail.gmail.com> contacted the maintainer on the 22 no response since. I flagged it out of date a while ago. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com From mimocciola at yahoo.com Sun Feb 28 04:40:28 2010 From: mimocciola at yahoo.com (Michele Mocciola) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 01:40:28 -0800 (PST) Subject: [aur-general] Removal request - soqt-svn, pivy-svn, coin-mercurial Message-ID: <281724.2952.qm@web53501.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Please remove: - soqt-svn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27293) - pivy-svn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32334) - coin-mercurial (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34241). SVN version of SoQt and Pivy are no more updated, just because developers now use mercurial (see soqt-hg (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34865) and pivy-hg (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34864) ). Also coin has past to mercurial, so I created "coin-mercurial", however I think it's better to change its name to "coin-hg". Thanks, mickele From stefan-husmann at t-online.de Sun Feb 28 06:21:47 2010 From: stefan-husmann at t-online.de (Stefan Husmann) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:21:47 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] orphan perl-hash-merge plz In-Reply-To: <81bfc67a1002272037o37b1a6cfr4abe274f28e04c60@mail.gmail.com> References: <81bfc67a1002272037o37b1a6cfr4abe274f28e04c60@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B8A51CB.4060002@t-online.de> Am 28.02.2010 05:37, schrieb Caleb Cushing: > contacted the maintainer on the 22 no response since. I flagged it out > of date a while ago. > orphaned From atsutane at freethoughts.de Sun Feb 28 08:57:18 2010 From: atsutane at freethoughts.de (Thorsten =?ISO-8859-1?B?VPZwcGVy?=) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:57:18 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Removal request - soqt-svn, pivy-svn, coin-mercurial In-Reply-To: <281724.2952.qm@web53501.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <281724.2952.qm@web53501.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20100228145718.1e87d992@hell> On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 01:40:28 -0800 (PST) Michele Mocciola wrote: > Please remove: > - soqt-svn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27293) > - pivy-svn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32334) > - coin-mercurial (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34241). > > SVN version of SoQt and Pivy are no more updated, just because > developers now use mercurial (see soqt-hg > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34865) and pivy-hg > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34864) ). Also coin has > past to mercurial, so I created "coin-mercurial", however I think > it's better to change its name to "coin-hg". Thanks, > > mickele Done, thank you. -- Jabber: atsutane at freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 222 bytes Desc: not available URL: