[aur-general] Package merge request: vim-solarized-git and vim-colors-solarized-git

Jason St. John jstjohn at purdue.edu
Fri Oct 18 10:49:46 EDT 2013


On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Felix Yan <felixonmars at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 20:28:36 Jason St. John wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jason St. John <jstjohn at purdue.edu> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Jason St. John <jstjohn at purdue.edu> wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> I'm not sure which is a better package name as there seems to be no
>> >> dominating convention in the AUR, so I will leave that decision up to
>> >> the TUs.
>> >>
>> >> Please do one of the following:
>> >> --- merge vim-solarized-git into vim-colors-solarized-git
>> >> --- have the package maintainer update vim-solarized-git and delete
>> >> vim-colors-solarized-git
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I've CC'd the maintainer of both packages.
>> >>
>> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-solarized-git/
>> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-colors-solarized-git/
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >
>> > This still needs to be acted upon.
>>
>> Can a TU delete vim-solarized-git please?
>>
>> Jason
>
> We still need to wait for xales's response, as this is his package and will still be maintained by him even after the merge.
>
> Regards,
> Felix Yan

xales is the new maintainer of both packages, and instead of updating
vim-solarized-git, he created a new package
(vim-colors-solarized-git). I think it's pretty clear which package
xales prefers.

Jason


More information about the aur-general mailing list