[pacman-dev] Arch neutrral packages

[Jeff 'codemac' Mickey]

* On Monday, April 09 2007, Andrew Fyfe wrote:

>Is it worth adding something like arch=(NOARCH) for packages that are 
>arch neutral (ie they only contain text files, scripts...) so we don't 
>have 2 identical packages for i686 and x86_64.
>
>Andrew

The PKGBUILD's would be the exact same, as a matter of fact, they would be 
built from the same source...

And where do you suggest we put the arch neutral packages?  current, 
current64 and currentNONE?

I like the current setup, it minimizes complexity and is perfectly verbose.

-- 
.: [ + carpe diem totus tuus + ] :.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/attachments/20070409/16db9ad2/attachment.pgp>