[arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

Thomas Dziedzic gostrc at gmail.com
Sun Jan 30 02:58:36 EST 2011


On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 1:00 AM, David C. Rankin
<drankinatty at suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
> On 01/29/2011 12:09 AM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
>> 2011/1/28 David C. Rankin <drankinatty at suddenlinkmail.com>
>>
>>> On 01/28/2011 11:30 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>        So what say the powers that be? Do the wiki page here or
>>> at
>>>>>>>> Trinity?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The wiki is for Arch-related documentation, so why not?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes! wiki it up!
>>>> kde3 is only dead as long as noone maintains it. That's how Arch works,
>>>> after all. So yes, I think putting Trinity on the wiki is fine, and it
>>>> should/will only get nixed if it stops getting maintained.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Peter, Ray, Thomas and Ng,
>>>
>>>        I'll get the framework done this weekend. It is a double bonus doing
>>> it here,
>>> Trinity uses FosWiki and it is miserable compared to mediawiki :)
>>>
>>> --
>>> David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks David, I am excited to see it!
>>
>> -Thomas S Hatch
>>
>
> Guys,
>
>  I have gotten the outline for the Trinity page completed and have made good
> headway getting the contents up. I still have information to add, but my fingers
> wore out. I get the remaining info up in the next day or so. The page is:
>
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trinity
>
>  I still need to know what to do with the PKGBUILDs I have so far. I don't know
> if I should upload them as part of the wiki, or just provide links to them on
> another site. I'll create the links once I know where you guys want me to put
> them. I can just leave them on my server (it's no size or bandwidth issue)
>
>  If you have thoughts or ideas for solving some of the problems mentioned in
> the wiki, let me know. I'm shallow on experience with PKGBUILDs, but learning
> fast. That's it for now.
>
>

The best place for any PKGBUILD is really in the AUR and maybe under a
seperate source control, but that's not really required.


More information about the arch-general mailing list