[aur-dev] [PATCH] Umark out-of-date on update
Callan Barrett
wizzomafizzo at gmail.com
Sun May 4 14:16:39 EDT 2008
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 2:05 AM, BaSh <bash.lnx at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Callan,
> I think this patch isn't necessary: Packages->OutOfDate is default 0
> in the database.
>
> Regards,
> Andrea
>
> 2008/5/4 Callan Barrett <wizzomafizzo at gmail.com>:
>
>
> > Unmarks packages out of date on update, I can't think of a case where
> > this isn't a good idea and a lot of people complain about it
> > (stonecrest).
> >
> > --
> > Callan Barrett
> >
This is for when a pkgbuild is updated, not initially submitted. At
the moment the default behavior is to leave a package as Out-of-date
when a new package is uploaded to update an old one. If this is what
you meant I don't really follow why the patch isn't necessary.
--
Callan Barrett
More information about the aur-dev
mailing list