[aur-dev] [PATCH] Umark out-of-date on update

Callan Barrett wizzomafizzo at gmail.com
Sun May 4 14:16:39 EDT 2008


On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 2:05 AM, BaSh <bash.lnx at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Callan,
>  I think this patch isn't necessary: Packages->OutOfDate is default 0
>  in the database.
>
>  Regards,
>  Andrea
>
>  2008/5/4 Callan Barrett <wizzomafizzo at gmail.com>:
>
>
> > Unmarks packages out of date on update, I can't think of a case where
>  >  this isn't a good idea and a lot of people complain about it
>  >  (stonecrest).
>  >
>  >  --
>  >  Callan Barrett
>  >

This is for when a pkgbuild is updated, not initially submitted. At
the moment the default behavior is to leave a package as Out-of-date
when a new package is uploaded to update an old one. If this is what
you meant I don't really follow why the patch isn't necessary.

-- 
Callan Barrett




More information about the aur-dev mailing list