[aur-dev] [PATCH] Umark out-of-date on update
BaSh
bash.lnx at gmail.com
Sun May 4 14:26:04 EDT 2008
2008/5/4 Callan Barrett <wizzomafizzo at gmail.com>:
> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 2:05 AM, BaSh <bash.lnx at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Callan,
> > I think this patch isn't necessary: Packages->OutOfDate is default 0
> > in the database.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andrea
> >
> > 2008/5/4 Callan Barrett <wizzomafizzo at gmail.com>:
> >
> >
> > > Unmarks packages out of date on update, I can't think of a case where
> > > this isn't a good idea and a lot of people complain about it
> > > (stonecrest).
> > >
> > > --
> > > Callan Barrett
> > >
>
> This is for when a pkgbuild is updated, not initially submitted. At
> the moment the default behavior is to leave a package as Out-of-date
> when a new package is uploaded to update an old one. If this is what
> you meant I don't really follow why the patch isn't necessary.
Ops...excuse me, i didn't look it is for when a pkgbuild is updated :)
Andrea
--
Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino
Arch Linux Trusted User
Linux User: #430842
More information about the aur-dev
mailing list